OTP Group Company Cyber Security Posture
otpgroup.infoOTP Group is one of the fastest growing banking groups in Central and Eastern Europe with a bridgehead in Central Asia, ranked number one on The Banker’s Top100 CEE Banks 2023 list by Tier 1 capital. With unique knowledge of the region and a lasting commitment to it, OTP Group is working towards helping the development of the region to become the continent’s growth engine. OTP Group operates in 11 countries - 10 in CEE region and 1 in Uzbekistan, employing nearly 40,000 people and providing universal financial services to 17 million customers. The Group stands on the top spot on The Banker’s Magazine Top 100 CEE Banks 2023 ranked by Tier 1 capital and is the 4th most stress-resilient banking group in Europe, according to the CET1 rate decrease under three years stress scenario based on the European Banking Authority’s European banking stress test 2023. Headquartered in Hungary, OTP Group has a diversified and transparent ownership structure, its shares are listed on the Budapest Stock Exchange since 1995. It is a market leader in terms of total assets in Hungary (31/12/2022) and Montenegro (31/12/2023), while in terms of total loans, in Bulgaria (31/12/2023), Serbia (30/09/2023) and Slovenia (30/09/2023).* We strive to provide excellent financial services through digital innovation, AI, and data-driven insights. We act as a driver of the region’s digital transformation. We are an inclusive, diverse, and progressive European employer. We focus on developing our colleagues to increase our intellectual capital for the benefit of our teams, customers, and partners. We develop Group-wide financial literacy programs, while working to enable sustainable development across the region. We have what it takes to get it done. * Sources: Hungarian National Bank Golden Books, Central Bank of Montenegro, Bulgarian National Bank; National Bank of Serbia, market related data from Bank of Slovania and individual data based on this in the context of subsidiary reporting.
OTP Group Company Details
otp-group
10412 employees
4966.0
52
Financial Services
otpgroup.info
Scan still pending
OTP_3070814
In-progress
OTP Group Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
OTP Group Global Score.png)
OTP Group Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
OTP Group Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
OTP Group Company Subsidiaries
OTP Group is one of the fastest growing banking groups in Central and Eastern Europe with a bridgehead in Central Asia, ranked number one on The Banker’s Top100 CEE Banks 2023 list by Tier 1 capital. With unique knowledge of the region and a lasting commitment to it, OTP Group is working towards helping the development of the region to become the continent’s growth engine. OTP Group operates in 11 countries - 10 in CEE region and 1 in Uzbekistan, employing nearly 40,000 people and providing universal financial services to 17 million customers. The Group stands on the top spot on The Banker’s Magazine Top 100 CEE Banks 2023 ranked by Tier 1 capital and is the 4th most stress-resilient banking group in Europe, according to the CET1 rate decrease under three years stress scenario based on the European Banking Authority’s European banking stress test 2023. Headquartered in Hungary, OTP Group has a diversified and transparent ownership structure, its shares are listed on the Budapest Stock Exchange since 1995. It is a market leader in terms of total assets in Hungary (31/12/2022) and Montenegro (31/12/2023), while in terms of total loans, in Bulgaria (31/12/2023), Serbia (30/09/2023) and Slovenia (30/09/2023).* We strive to provide excellent financial services through digital innovation, AI, and data-driven insights. We act as a driver of the region’s digital transformation. We are an inclusive, diverse, and progressive European employer. We focus on developing our colleagues to increase our intellectual capital for the benefit of our teams, customers, and partners. We develop Group-wide financial literacy programs, while working to enable sustainable development across the region. We have what it takes to get it done. * Sources: Hungarian National Bank Golden Books, Central Bank of Montenegro, Bulgarian National Bank; National Bank of Serbia, market related data from Bank of Slovania and individual data based on this in the context of subsidiary reporting.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
OTP Group Cyber Security News
Best Financial Innovation Labs 2025
Many FIs host labs nurturing outside startups. These labs operate around the world and focus on everything from deploying Gen AI to ...
Hackers target bank clients in Czechia, Hungary and Georgia in novel phishing campaign
Hackers set up malicious banking applications that were nearly identical to legitimate European ones in an effort to steal user data in an ...
Czech Mobile Users Targeted in New Banking Credential Theft Scheme
Discover how cybercriminals are using Progressive Web Apps to steal banking credentials in a sophisticated phishing campaign targeting ...
MTN cybersecurity incident, but critical infrastructure secure
MTN Group would like to inform stakeholders that it has experienced a cybersecurity incident that resulted in unauthorised access to ...
PoC Exploit Released for Erlang/OTP SSH Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
This vulnerability allows malicious actors with network access to hosts running an Erlang/OTP SSH server to execute unauthenticated remote code.
Fraudsters plead guilty to exploiting OTPs for bank account theft in UK
Three men have admitted in court of fraudulently obtaining OTPs from customers of numerous banks and financial services across the UK.
BSP eyes gradual OTP phase-out, demands stronger bank security amid cybercrime surge
The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) is urging banks to enhance their cybersecurity defenses, warning that one-time passwords (OTPs) are no ...
Enhancing cybersecurity with “moving trees”
An SUTD professor and his collaborators propose a new tree-inspired one-time password scheme that provides security and privacy while supporting ...
MTN Ghana confirms 5,700 customers affected by data breach
The MTN Group has revealed that approximately 5,700 MTN Ghana customers may have been impacted by a recent security breach.
OTP Group Similar Companies
IIFL (India Infoline Group)
IIFL group is one of India's largest diversified financial services conglomerates with three listed entities - IIFL Finance, IIFL Securities and 360 ONE Wealth & Asset Management. Founded in 1995 by Nirmal Jain as a small research house, today IIFL Group employs over 40000 people and caters to over
TMF Group
We provide employee, financial and legal administration so that firms can invest and operate safely around the world. TMF Group is a single global team with over 11,000 colleagues in more than 125 offices across 87 jurisdictions, covering 92% of world GDP and 95% of FDI inflow. We bring common c
Discovery Limited
Imagine a world where people live healthier, more enhanced and protected lives… A world in which each organisation is a powerful influencer and responsible corporate citizen, committed to being a force for social good. As a leading innovator in healthcare, wellness, insurance, investments, financial
BNY
We help make money work for the world — managing it, moving it and keeping it safe. As a leading global financial services company at the center of the world’s financial system, we touch nearly 20% of the world’s investable assets. Today we help over 90% of Fortune 100 companies and nearly all the t
Apex Group Ltd (Europe)
We are a single-source financial solutions provider dedicated to driving positive change while supporting the growth and ambitions of asset managers, allocators, financial institutions, and family offices around the world. Established in Bermuda in 2003, we have continually disrupted the industry
Broadridge
Broadridge Financial Solutions (NYSE: BR) is a global technology leader with the trusted expertise and transformative technology to help clients and the financial services industry operate, innovate, and grow. We power investing, governance, and communications for our clients – driving operational r
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
OTP Group CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, OTP Group has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, OTP Group has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as OTP Group is one of the fastest growing banking groups in Central and Eastern Europe with a bridgehead in Central Asia, ranked number one on The Banker’s Top100 CEE Banks 2023 list by Tier 1 capital. With unique knowledge of the region and a lasting commitment to it, OTP Group is working towards helping the development of the region to become the continent’s growth engine. OTP Group operates in 11 countries - 10 in CEE region and 1 in Uzbekistan, employing nearly 40,000 people and providing universal financial services to 17 million customers. The Group stands on the top spot on The Banker’s Magazine Top 100 CEE Banks 2023 ranked by Tier 1 capital and is the 4th most stress-resilient banking group in Europe, according to the CET1 rate decrease under three years stress scenario based on the European Banking Authority’s European banking stress test 2023. Headquartered in Hungary, OTP Group has a diversified and transparent ownership structure, its shares are listed on the Budapest Stock Exchange since 1995. It is a market leader in terms of total assets in Hungary (31/12/2022) and Montenegro (31/12/2023), while in terms of total loans, in Bulgaria (31/12/2023), Serbia (30/09/2023) and Slovenia (30/09/2023).* We strive to provide excellent financial services through digital innovation, AI, and data-driven insights. We act as a driver of the region’s digital transformation. We are an inclusive, diverse, and progressive European employer. We focus on developing our colleagues to increase our intellectual capital for the benefit of our teams, customers, and partners. We develop Group-wide financial literacy programs, while working to enable sustainable development across the region. We have what it takes to get it done. * Sources: Hungarian National Bank Golden Books, Central Bank of Montenegro, Bulgarian National Bank; National Bank of Serbia, market related data from Bank of Slovania and individual data based on this in the context of subsidiary reporting..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
