Abdullah Al-Othaim Markets Company Cyber Security Posture
othaimmarkets.comتعتبر أسواق عبدالله العثيم امتداد لمؤسسة صالح العثيم التجارية، التي أسسها في عام 1376هـ ( 1956م ) الشيخ الراحل/ صالح العثيم " يرحمه الله "حيث افتتحت تلك المؤسسة موقعها الأول في قلب منطقة العمل التجاري آنذاك الرياض-حلة القصمان، وعملت في تجارة المواد الغذائية وفي عام 1401 هـ / 1980 م تم تأسيس شركة أسواق عبدالله العثيم التجارية لتواصل المسيرة في توسيع العمل وفتح مراكز للبيع بالجملة والتجزئة، و في عام 1412هـ ( 1992م ) تم افتتاح مستودعات كبيرة بمعايير عالية في التخزين لدعم نمو وتطور هذه الشركة بمراكزها المتعددة وقد جهزت هذه المستودعات بأحدث أساليب التخزين الجاف والمبرد، وحرصت على زيادة أسطول سيارات التوزيع لرفع مستوى الخدمة المقدمة للعملاء وتسهيل التعاون مع الموردين، واليوم ولله الحمد أصبح عدد فروعها يفوق ٣٦٠ فرع على مستوى المملكة العربية السعودية في عام 2022م ، وبمساحة اجمالية أكثر من 500 الف م2 للفروع وبإجمالي مبيعات سنوية تجاوزت حاجز ١٠ مليار ريال ، كما توسعت فروع أسواق عبدالله العثيم لتغطي ١٠٠ مدينة ومحافظة داخل المملكة العربية السعودية ، وتفتخر شركة أسواق عبدالله العثيم بعدد كوادرها الذي يبلغ عددهم اكثر من ١٨٠٠٠ موظف وموظفة، وتواصل الشركة استراتيجيتها التوسعية وزيادة قاعدة الفروع على مستوى المملكة وفق رؤية متكاملة واهتمام يتجدد بتقديم خدمات متميزة وشاملة لكل العملاء
AAM Company Details
othaim-markets-company
10,001+ employees
93251
452
Retail
othaimmarkets.com
Scan still pending
ABD_2108838
In-progress
AAM Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
AAM Global Score.png)
Abdullah Al-Othaim Markets Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
Abdullah Al-Othaim Markets Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Abdullah Al-Othaim Markets Company Subsidiaries
تعتبر أسواق عبدالله العثيم امتداد لمؤسسة صالح العثيم التجارية، التي أسسها في عام 1376هـ ( 1956م ) الشيخ الراحل/ صالح العثيم " يرحمه الله "حيث افتتحت تلك المؤسسة موقعها الأول في قلب منطقة العمل التجاري آنذاك الرياض-حلة القصمان، وعملت في تجارة المواد الغذائية وفي عام 1401 هـ / 1980 م تم تأسيس شركة أسواق عبدالله العثيم التجارية لتواصل المسيرة في توسيع العمل وفتح مراكز للبيع بالجملة والتجزئة، و في عام 1412هـ ( 1992م ) تم افتتاح مستودعات كبيرة بمعايير عالية في التخزين لدعم نمو وتطور هذه الشركة بمراكزها المتعددة وقد جهزت هذه المستودعات بأحدث أساليب التخزين الجاف والمبرد، وحرصت على زيادة أسطول سيارات التوزيع لرفع مستوى الخدمة المقدمة للعملاء وتسهيل التعاون مع الموردين، واليوم ولله الحمد أصبح عدد فروعها يفوق ٣٦٠ فرع على مستوى المملكة العربية السعودية في عام 2022م ، وبمساحة اجمالية أكثر من 500 الف م2 للفروع وبإجمالي مبيعات سنوية تجاوزت حاجز ١٠ مليار ريال ، كما توسعت فروع أسواق عبدالله العثيم لتغطي ١٠٠ مدينة ومحافظة داخل المملكة العربية السعودية ، وتفتخر شركة أسواق عبدالله العثيم بعدد كوادرها الذي يبلغ عددهم اكثر من ١٨٠٠٠ موظف وموظفة، وتواصل الشركة استراتيجيتها التوسعية وزيادة قاعدة الفروع على مستوى المملكة وفق رؤية متكاملة واهتمام يتجدد بتقديم خدمات متميزة وشاملة لكل العملاء
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
AAM Cyber Security News
Abdullah Al-Othaim Markets opens 24th branch in Egypt
The new store, located in El Matareya and spread across an area of 700-square meters, offers a wide variety of grocery items including, fruits, vegetables, meat ...
Al-Othaim pays $48m cash dividends for second half of 2021
Established in 1980, Al Othaim Markets operates in food wholesaling, grocery stores, and shopping malls in Egypt and the Kingdom.
Abdullah Al-Othaim Markets opens 35th branch in Egypt
Abdullah Al-Othaim Markets recently opened its 35th Egyptian branch in Cairo's Nasr City. The opening ceremony was attended by a number of employees, ...
Profits surge at Saudi food wholesaler Abdullah Al Othaim Markets
Saudi food wholesaler Abdullah Al Othaim Markets reported a 31 percent jump in net profit last year as food demand surged during lockdowns.
Al-Othaim Markets adds 18 branches as it plans $226m stake sale of investment arm
RIYADH: Al-Othaim Markets added 18 branches in the first half of 2022 as it prepares to sell its entire stake in its investment firm for SR846 ...
Al-Othaim provides funding worth SR3.7m to support kidney patients
Abdul Mohsen bin Abdullah Al-Othaim provided funding worth SR3.7 million ($986,482) for the purchase of advanced medical devices and equipment at the kidney ...
Abdullah Al-Othaim opens 231st branch in Saudi Arabia
Abdullah Al-Othaim Markets Company opened its 231st Saudi store in Diriyah, located in the Riyadh region. The opening ceremony was attended by Abdullah Al- ...
AAM Similar Companies
Jerónimo Martins
Founded in 1792, Jerónimo Martins is an international Group based in Portugal that operates in the food distribution and specialised retail sectors. Present in 6 countries and counting with more than 6 thousand stores, we are one of the oldest retailers in the world. We address the daily needs of
Starbucks
At Starbucks, we like to say that we are not in the coffee business serving people, but in the people business serving coffee. Here, our employees - who we call partners – are the heart of the Starbucks experience, and being a partner means aspiring to become part of something bigger: inspiring posi
The UPS Store
With more than 5,000 locally owned locations across North America, The UPS Store is the nation’s largest retail network of shipping, postal, printing and business service centers. The UPS Store, Inc., franchisor for The UPS Store locations in the U.S., is a wholly owned subsidiary of UPS. The UPS
Fred Meyer
The Kroger Co., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a food retailer in the United States. The company operates three formats of supermarkets: combination food and drug stores (combo stores), multi department stores, and price impact warehouse stores or marketplace stores. The combo stores op
Gap
In 1969, Don and Doris Fisher opened the first Gap store on Ocean Avenue in San Francisco. They wanted to make it easier to find a great pair of jeans, and they did. Their denim and records store was a hit, and it grew to become one of the world’s most iconic brands. Today we’re represented in m
Mr Price Group
Mr Price Group Limited is an omni-channel, fashion value retailer. The Group retails Apparel, Homeware and Sportsware and is one of the fastest growing retailers in South Africa. Our History: 1885 - The first John Orrs store opens 1934 - The first Hub store opens 1952 - John Orrs is listed on the J
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
AAM CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, AAM has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, AAM has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as تعتبر أسواق عبدالله العثيم امتداد لمؤسسة صالح العثيم التجارية، التي أسسها في عام 1376هـ ( 1956م ) الشيخ الراحل/ صالح العثيم " يرحمه الله "حيث افتتحت تلك المؤسسة موقعها الأول في قلب منطقة العمل التجاري آنذاك الرياض-حلة القصمان، وعملت في تجارة المواد الغذائية وفي عام 1401 هـ / 1980 م تم تأسيس شركة أسواق عبدالله العثيم التجارية لتواصل المسيرة في توسيع العمل وفتح مراكز للبيع بالجملة والتجزئة، و في عام 1412هـ ( 1992م ) تم افتتاح مستودعات كبيرة بمعايير عالية في التخزين لدعم نمو وتطور هذه الشركة بمراكزها المتعددة وقد جهزت هذه المستودعات بأحدث أساليب التخزين الجاف والمبرد، وحرصت على زيادة أسطول سيارات التوزيع لرفع مستوى الخدمة المقدمة للعملاء وتسهيل التعاون مع الموردين، واليوم ولله الحمد أصبح عدد فروعها يفوق ٣٦٠ فرع على مستوى المملكة العربية السعودية في عام 2022م ، وبمساحة اجمالية أكثر من 500 الف م2 للفروع وبإجمالي مبيعات سنوية تجاوزت حاجز ١٠ مليار ريال ، كما توسعت فروع أسواق عبدالله العثيم لتغطي ١٠٠ مدينة ومحافظة داخل المملكة العربية السعودية ، وتفتخر شركة أسواق عبدالله العثيم بعدد كوادرها الذي يبلغ عددهم اكثر من ١٨٠٠٠ موظف وموظفة، وتواصل الشركة استراتيجيتها التوسعية وزيادة قاعدة الفروع على مستوى المملكة وفق رؤية متكاملة واهتمام يتجدد بتقديم خدمات متميزة وشاملة لكل العملاء.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
