Orange Polska Company Cyber Security Posture
orange.plOrange Polska is the principal supplier of telecommunications services in Poland. Orange Polska provides services, including fixed-line voice telecommunications, voice mail, fixed access to the Internet and Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”). Orange Polska provides telecommunications services on the basis of entry number 1 in the register of telecommunications companies carried out by the President of Office of Electronic Communication. Through its subsidiary, Polska Telefonia Komórkowa-Centertel Sp. z o.o., the Group is one of Poland’s major DCS 1800 and GSM 900 mobile telecommunications providers. PTK-Centertel also provides third generation UMTS services and services based on the CDMA technology. In addition, the Group provides leased lines, radio-communications and other telecommunications value added services, sells telecommunications equipment, electronic phone cards and provides data transmission, multimedia services and various Internet services. As at the end of 2012 Orange Polska had over 20 million customers of different services (mobile, fixed voice, broadband, TV). As at the end of 2012 we achieved revenue of PLN 14.1 billion, EBITDA margin at 34.2% and net free cash flows of PLN 1.5 billion.
Orange Polska Company Details
orangepolska
10,001+ employees
30927
517
Telecommunications
orange.pl
Scan still pending
ORA_2314275
In-progress
Orange Polska Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Orange Polska Global Score.png)
Orange Polska Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Orange Polska Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orange Cyberdefense | Breach | 100 | 5 | 09/2022 | ORA2131141122 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization's existenceDescription: Orange Cyberdefense apparently suffered a data breach incident after a popular forum offered data allegedly from their firm. Data in the sample included Contact Name, Email, Phone Number, Company Name, and Solution Name. The listing also offered to sell access to Orange Cyberdefense’s servers. | |||||||
| Orange | Cyber Attack | 100 | 6 | 03/2022 | ORA2548322 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the economy of a geographical regionDescription: The cyber attackers targeted Orange and its subsidiary internet provider Nordnet in France. The cyberattack affected thousands of internet users across Europe amid the Ukraine-Russia war. Nearly 9,000 subscribers were affected by this internet outage. | |||||||
| Orange | Cyber Attack | 60 | 2 | 01/2024 | ORA214221124 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: An unknown number of consumers were unable to access specific websites as a result of a hack that targeted Orange's Spanish business, a telecom operator. Orange successfully identified and neutralised the majority of the unauthorised access to its IP network coordination centre. The French corporation said that there was no risk to client data in a message posted on the social networking platform X. | |||||||
| Orange | Ransomware | 80 | 4 | 07/2020 | ORA2911822 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: French telecommunications company Orange S.A.was targeted by a Nefilim ransomware group which resulted in data loss. The company's security team was mobilized to identify the origin of the attack and put in place all necessary solutions required to ensure the security of its systems. The data from about 20 customers on its virtual hosting service was accessed by those behind the ransomware attack. | |||||||
| Orange | Ransomware | 100 | 4 | 3/2025 | ORA625031825 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: Major telecommunications provider Orange suffered a severe security breach by the Babuk ransomware gang, resulting in the theft of 4.5 TB of sensitive data. The compromised data includes customer records, email addresses, user data, source code, invoices, internal documents, contracts, employee details, credit cards, messages, call logs, and other personal information. This cyberattack has put both customers and the company at significant risk, impacting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of valuable data. | |||||||
Orange Polska Company Subsidiaries
Orange Polska is the principal supplier of telecommunications services in Poland. Orange Polska provides services, including fixed-line voice telecommunications, voice mail, fixed access to the Internet and Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”). Orange Polska provides telecommunications services on the basis of entry number 1 in the register of telecommunications companies carried out by the President of Office of Electronic Communication. Through its subsidiary, Polska Telefonia Komórkowa-Centertel Sp. z o.o., the Group is one of Poland’s major DCS 1800 and GSM 900 mobile telecommunications providers. PTK-Centertel also provides third generation UMTS services and services based on the CDMA technology. In addition, the Group provides leased lines, radio-communications and other telecommunications value added services, sells telecommunications equipment, electronic phone cards and provides data transmission, multimedia services and various Internet services. As at the end of 2012 Orange Polska had over 20 million customers of different services (mobile, fixed voice, broadband, TV). As at the end of 2012 we achieved revenue of PLN 14.1 billion, EBITDA margin at 34.2% and net free cash flows of PLN 1.5 billion.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Orange Polska Cyber Security News
Latest consolidated results
First quarter 2025 revenues reached 9,911 million euros, up 0.6% year on year1 (+62 million euros) thanks to growth in retail services (+2.4% or ...
Emitel to build hundreds of towers for Orange Poland
Poland-based telecoms infrastructure company Emitel has signed an agreement with Orange to build several hundred new mobile towers across ...
Orange Poland stops record 1.3 Tbps DDoS attack on customer
Orange Poland said that its CERT recently stopped a DDoS attack at up to 1.3 Tbps against one of its customers, a leading Polish company.
Silk Cloud Partners with Orange Polska’s Integrated Solutions to Boost Georgia’s Digital Transformation
The collaboration will enable Silknet and its daughter company Silk Cloud to expand and improve digital services offered to businesses by ...
Orange signs up cybersecurity specialist Cyan for three more years
Orange has extended a contract with cybersecurity specialist Cyan by three more years, in a deal that covers all Group affiliates in 26 ...
Orange Group confirms breach after hacker leaks company documents
A hacker claims to have stolen thousands of internal documents with user records and employee data after breaching the systems of Orange ...
Huawei fears it may be excluded from Poland’s 5G network
Huawei fears it may be excluded from Poland's 5G network. Poland's planned criteria for assessing the risk of telecoms equipment providers are political and may ...
Orange seeks home advantage with new value added services and store
Orange has highlighted plans to launch new value‑added services in the home, leveraging the evolution of network and Wi‑Fi technology and AI ...
Orange Poland completes migration to Teradata Vantage on Google Cloud to speed time-to-market and ROI
Orange Poland has migrated its core reporting and analytical processes to Teradata Vantage on Google Cloud.
Orange Polska Similar Companies
OPPO
Founded in 2004, OPPO is one of the world's leading innovators of smart devices. With operations in over 60 countries and regions, OPPO's more than 290,000 points of sales and 1,900 official service centers share the beauty of technology with users all over the world. To forward our vision of a bett
Orange RDC
Orange RDC est l’un des principaux opérateurs de télécommunication de la RDC qui offre des solutions globales de télécommunication dans le domaine du fixe, du mobile, de l’internet et des données au service des particuliers et des entreprises. Elle est l'une des marques préférées de la
Totalplay
Somos una empresa orgullosamente mexicana, líder en tecnología, telecomunicaciones y entretenimiento. Estamos siempre a la vanguardia con el objetivo de llevar a nuestros clientes lo mejor en conectividad, ya sea para que estén cerca de los que más quieren ó puedan alcanzar el éxito profesion
Vodafone
At Vodafone, we believe that connectivity is a force for good. If we use it for the things that really matter, it can improve people's lives and the world around us. Through our technology we empower people, connecting everyone regardless of who they are or where they live, we protect the planet a
ZTE Corporation
ZTE Corporation is a global leading provider of integrated information and communication technology solutions. Founded in 1985 and listed on both the Hong Kong and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges, the company has been committed to providing innovative technologies and integrated solutions for global operat
MEGACABLE
Mega es una empresa cien por ciento mexicana y líder en el sector de Telecomunicaciones, tenemos 45 años de servicio y casi 5 millones de suscriptores a quienes les ofrecemos los servicios de TV, internet, telefonía digital y móvil. Estamos en constante crecimiento, hoy en día tenemos presenci
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Orange Polska CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Orange Polska has faced 5 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack', 'Ransomware', 'Breach'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Orange Polska is the principal supplier of telecommunications services in Poland. Orange Polska provides services, including fixed-line voice telecommunications, voice mail, fixed access to the Internet and Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”). Orange Polska provides telecommunications services on the basis of entry number 1 in the register of telecommunications companies carried out by the President of Office of Electronic Communication. Through its subsidiary, Polska Telefonia Komórkowa-Centertel Sp. z o.o., the Group is one of Poland’s major DCS 1800 and GSM 900 mobile telecommunications providers. PTK-Centertel also provides third generation UMTS services and services based on the CDMA technology. In addition, the Group provides leased lines, radio-communications and other telecommunications value added services, sells telecommunications equipment, electronic phone cards and provides data transmission, multimedia services and various Internet services. As at the end of 2012 Orange Polska had over 20 million customers of different services (mobile, fixed voice, broadband, TV). As at the end of 2012 we achieved revenue of PLN 14.1 billion, EBITDA margin at 34.2% and net free cash flows of PLN 1.5 billion..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Cyber Attack', 'Ransomware'].
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
