Comparison Overview

Olympus Corporation

VS

Boston Scientific

Olympus Corporation

Nishi-shinjuku 2-3-1 Shinjuku Monolith, Shinjuku-ku, JP
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.olympus-global.com/

Olympus is passionate about creating customer-driven solutions for the medical industry. For more than 100 years, Olympus has focused on making people’s lives healthier, safer and more fulfilling by helping detect, prevent, and treat disease, furthering scientific research, and ensuring public safety. Olympus is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan, with more than 31,000 employees worldwide in nearly 40 countries and regions.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 13,565
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Boston Scientific

100 Boston Scientific Way, Marlborough, 01752, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bostonscientific.com

Boston Scientific transforms lives through innovative medical technologies that improve the health of patients around the world. As a global medical technology leader for more than 40 years, we advance science for life by providing a broad range of high-performance solutions that address unmet patient needs and reduce the cost of health care. Our portfolio of devices and therapies helps physicians diagnose and treat complex cardiovascular, respiratory, digestive, oncological, neurological and urological diseases and conditions. For more information, visit www.bostonscientific.com and connect with us on X, Instagram, and Facebook. At Boston Scientific, you will find purpose, a place to grow and opportunities to cultivate your passions. To search and apply for open positions, visit https://bostonscientific.eightfold.ai/careers. You may also review our social media guidelines at http://www.bostonscientific.com/social.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 52,506
Subsidiaries: 153
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/olympus-corp.jpeg
Olympus Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-scientific.jpeg
Boston Scientific
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Olympus Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Boston Scientific
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Olympus Corporation in 2026.

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston Scientific in 2026.

Incident History — Olympus Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Olympus Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Boston Scientific (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Scientific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/olympus-corp.jpeg
Olympus Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-scientific.jpeg
Boston Scientific
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: malicious insider, unauthorized network access, ransomware deployment (BlackCat/ALPHV)
Motivation: financial gain, personal debt (Goldberg), enrichment
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Olympus Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boston Scientific company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Boston Scientific company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Olympus Corporation company has not reported any.

In the current year, Boston Scientific company and Olympus Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Boston Scientific company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Olympus Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Boston Scientific company nor Olympus Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Boston Scientific company nor Olympus Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Olympus Corporation company nor Boston Scientific company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Olympus Corporation nor Boston Scientific holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Boston Scientific company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Olympus Corporation company.

Boston Scientific company employs more people globally than Olympus Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Medical Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Olympus Corporation nor Boston Scientific holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Olympus Corporation nor Boston Scientific holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Olympus Corporation nor Boston Scientific holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Olympus Corporation nor Boston Scientific holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Olympus Corporation nor Boston Scientific holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Olympus Corporation nor Boston Scientific holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References