Comparison Overview

Odebrecht

VS

Sonae

Odebrecht

Av. Luís Viana, 2841, Salvador, 41730-900, BR
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.novonor.com.br/

Founded in 1944, Odebrecht is a Brazilian group with diverse businesses and world-class standards of quality. Its Members, guided by the Group’s own philosophy, the Odebrecht Entrepreneurial Technology (TEO), provide services and manufacture products for clients on five continents. As part of their entrepreneurial responsibility while serving clients and local communities, they contribute to the development of economically prosperous, socially just, environmentally sustainable, politically inclusive and culturally rich societies and countries.

NAICS: 5239
NAICS Definition: Other Financial Investment Activities
Employees: 14,112
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sonae

Maia, Porto, 4470-177, PT
Last Update: 2026-03-31
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sonae.pt

Sonae exists to create a lasting positive impact on businesses, people, communities and on the planet. Managing a diverse portfolio of businesses in retail, financial services, technology, investments, real estate and telecommunications, Sonae makes the most of its expertise and pushes itself to create the future we all want and need. Creating today a better tomorrow, for all.

NAICS: 5239
NAICS Definition: Other Financial Investment Activities
Employees: 24,146
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/odebrecht.jpeg
Odebrecht
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonae.jpeg
Sonae
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Odebrecht
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sonae
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Odebrecht in 2026.

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sonae in 2026.

Incident History — Odebrecht (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Odebrecht cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sonae (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sonae cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/odebrecht.jpeg
Odebrecht
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonae.jpeg
Sonae
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Odebrecht company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sonae company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sonae company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Odebrecht company.

In the current year, Sonae company and Odebrecht company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sonae company nor Odebrecht company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sonae company nor Odebrecht company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sonae company nor Odebrecht company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Odebrecht company nor Sonae company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Odebrecht nor Sonae holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sonae company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Odebrecht company.

Sonae company employs more people globally than Odebrecht company, reflecting its scale as a Investment Management.

Neither Odebrecht nor Sonae holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Odebrecht nor Sonae holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Odebrecht nor Sonae holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Odebrecht nor Sonae holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Odebrecht nor Sonae holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Odebrecht nor Sonae holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References