Netlog Logistics Group Company Cyber Security Posture
netloglogistics.comโรรฌ Based in Istanbul, Turkey, Netlog Logistics Group (โรรบNLGโรรน) is an internationally acclaimed logistics services provider (โรรบLSPโรรน) โรรฌ NLG offers warehousing, international road, air and sea freight transportation, as well as temperature-controlled logistics and liquid bulk food transportation solutions focused on Europe, MENA and Central Asia with global service capabilities โรรฌ With its agile corporate structure, management style, bold and pro-active investment strategy, NLG became a top 100 LSP in the world and the 64th largest company in Turkey โรรฌ Its sector-based logistics branding strategy and innovative approach to logistics challenges in these sector verticals attracted top local brands as well as global bluechip customers โรรฌ Netlog Logistics Group operates 120 sites across Turkey, Europe, Middle East, Far East and the USA, manages the global product flow and local logistics of some of the most recognized brands around the world YEAR OF ESTABLISHMENT 2003 BOARD OF DIRECTORS โรปahap โรกAK, Gโโkalp โรกAK, Erdal KESRELฦโOฦรปLU,Hasan Hakkฦยฑ YILMAZ, Erman KALKANDELEN MAIN SERVICES Supply Chain Management, Domestic and International Transportation MAIN INDUSTRIES OF SERVICE Dry & Temperature Controlled Food, Pharmaceuticals, Fashion and Lifestyle, Technology NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES +13.000 NUMBER OF VEHICLES +4.000 NUMBER OF WAREHOUSES 91 MAJOR BRANDS Netlog Logistics, Bleckmann Fashion and Life Style Logistics, PolarXP Temperature Controlled Logistics, Palex Pooling Services, GreenBridge Multimodal, Intercombi International Road and Intermodal Transport, NGF Air & Sea Freight, Musoshi EV, HATCE Software, NetIstif Equipment Leasing, NetEnergy, Kuresel Procurement Solutions COMPANY TYPE Private
NLG Company Details
netlog-logistics-group
10,001+ employees
58722
484
Truck Transportation
netloglogistics.com
Scan still pending
NET_2249816
In-progress
NLG Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
NLG Global Score.png)
Netlog Logistics Group Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Netlog Logistics Group Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Netlog Logistics Group Company Subsidiaries
โรรฌ Based in Istanbul, Turkey, Netlog Logistics Group (โรรบNLGโรรน) is an internationally acclaimed logistics services provider (โรรบLSPโรรน) โรรฌ NLG offers warehousing, international road, air and sea freight transportation, as well as temperature-controlled logistics and liquid bulk food transportation solutions focused on Europe, MENA and Central Asia with global service capabilities โรรฌ With its agile corporate structure, management style, bold and pro-active investment strategy, NLG became a top 100 LSP in the world and the 64th largest company in Turkey โรรฌ Its sector-based logistics branding strategy and innovative approach to logistics challenges in these sector verticals attracted top local brands as well as global bluechip customers โรรฌ Netlog Logistics Group operates 120 sites across Turkey, Europe, Middle East, Far East and the USA, manages the global product flow and local logistics of some of the most recognized brands around the world YEAR OF ESTABLISHMENT 2003 BOARD OF DIRECTORS โรปahap โรกAK, Gโโkalp โรกAK, Erdal KESRELฦโOฦรปLU,Hasan Hakkฦยฑ YILMAZ, Erman KALKANDELEN MAIN SERVICES Supply Chain Management, Domestic and International Transportation MAIN INDUSTRIES OF SERVICE Dry & Temperature Controlled Food, Pharmaceuticals, Fashion and Lifestyle, Technology NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES +13.000 NUMBER OF VEHICLES +4.000 NUMBER OF WAREHOUSES 91 MAJOR BRANDS Netlog Logistics, Bleckmann Fashion and Life Style Logistics, PolarXP Temperature Controlled Logistics, Palex Pooling Services, GreenBridge Multimodal, Intercombi International Road and Intermodal Transport, NGF Air & Sea Freight, Musoshi EV, HATCE Software, NetIstif Equipment Leasing, NetEnergy, Kuresel Procurement Solutions COMPANY TYPE Private
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
NLG Cyber Security News
Turkeyโs logistics providers adjust to the strains of Covid-19
Pandemic creates headaches and opportunities for those moving goods from warehouse to market.
Franklin Templeton in Talks to Buy Abraajโs Turkey Business
U.S. asset management firm Franklin Templeton Investments has been in exclusive talks to take over the Turkish operations of Dubai-basedย ...
NLG Similar Companies
Veolia Transport
* Incorporate all transportation options seamlessly into the region * Offer a coordinated, smooth, interlocking transportation system * Provide each rider with high-quality service * Make our employees central to our business plan * Make tangible, measurable improvements to the e
DSV - Global Transport and Logistics
At DSV, we keep supply chains flowing in a world of change. We provide and manage supply chain solutions for thousands of companies every day โ from small family-run businesses to large global corporations. Our reach is global, yet our presence is local and close to our customers. Approx. 75,000 e
STEF
STEF group is the European leader for temperature controlled logistics and transport. Our 22,000 employees in 8 countries are dedicated to serve everyday agrifood, distribution, foodservice and seafood players with the highest standards of security, rapidity and quality. The group relies on a wide
Penske Truck Leasing
Penske Truck Leasing is a Penske Transportation Solutions company headquartered in Reading, Pennsylvania. A leading provider of innovative transportation solutions, Penske operates and maintains more than 437,000 vehicles and serves its customers from nearly 1,000 maintenance facilities and more tha
ATAC SpA
With over 100 years of history, Atac is Rome's municipal utility for public transport services and Italy's leading urban mobility operator, as well as being one of the largest Local Public Transport companies in Europe. From the historical centre to the outskirts, Atacรขโฌโขs network covers a territor
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
NLG CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, NLG has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, NLG has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as โรรฌ Based in Istanbul, Turkey, Netlog Logistics Group (โรรบNLGโรรน) is an internationally acclaimed logistics services provider (โรรบLSPโรรน) โรรฌ NLG offers warehousing, international road, air and sea freight transportation, as well as temperature-controlled logistics and liquid bulk food transportation solutions focused on Europe, MENA and Central Asia with global service capabilities โรรฌ With its agile corporate structure, management style, bold and pro-active investment strategy, NLG became a top 100 LSP in the world and the 64th largest company in Turkey โรรฌ Its sector-based logistics branding strategy and innovative approach to logistics challenges in these sector verticals attracted top local brands as well as global bluechip customers โรรฌ Netlog Logistics Group operates 120 sites across Turkey, Europe, Middle East, Far East and the USA, manages the global product flow and local logistics of some of the most recognized brands around the world YEAR OF ESTABLISHMENT 2003 BOARD OF DIRECTORS โรปahap โรกAK, Gโโkalp โรกAK, Erdal KESRELฦโOฦรปLU,Hasan Hakkฦยฑ YILMAZ, Erman KALKANDELEN MAIN SERVICES Supply Chain Management, Domestic and International Transportation MAIN INDUSTRIES OF SERVICE Dry & Temperature Controlled Food, Pharmaceuticals, Fashion and Lifestyle, Technology NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES +13.000 NUMBER OF VEHICLES +4.000 NUMBER OF WAREHOUSES 91 MAJOR BRANDS Netlog Logistics, Bleckmann Fashion and Life Style Logistics, PolarXP Temperature Controlled Logistics, Palex Pooling Services, GreenBridge Multimodal, Intercombi International Road and Intermodal Transport, NGF Air & Sea Freight, Musoshi EV, HATCE Software, NetIstif Equipment Leasing, NetEnergy, Kuresel Procurement Solutions COMPANY TYPE Private.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
