Comparison Overview

Netcare

VS

Endeavor Health

Netcare

76 Maude street (corner West street), Johannesburg, 2196, ZA
Last Update: 2026-03-23
Between 750 and 799

The Netcare Group (JSE: NTC) offers a unique, comprehensive range of medical services across the healthcare spectrum, enabling us to serve the health and care needs of each individual who entrust their care to us. Our focus on implementing sophisticated digital systems will enable us to provide care that is fully integrated and an enhanced experience across our Group's operations. At Netcare, we are striving to change healthcare for the better. In addition to its world-class acute private hospital services, Netcare provides: o radiosurgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, bone marrow transplant and robotic-assisted surgery through Netcare Cancer Care; o primary healthcare services through Medicross; o emergency medical services through Netcare 911; o occupational health and employee wellness services through Netcare Occupational Health; o mental health and psychiatric services through Akeso; o innovative solutions to increase access to quality and affordable private healthcare through NetcarePlus; and o renal dialysis services through National Renal Care (NRC). Netcare is also a leading private trainer of emergency medical and nursing personnel in the country. For more information visit www.netcare.co.za.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 13,509
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Endeavor Health

1301 Central St, Evanston, 60201, US
Last Update: 2026-03-30

NorthShore University HealthSystem, Swedish Hospital, Northwest Community Healthcare and Edward-Elmhurst Health are now united under one name: Endeavor Health. Together, we’re driven by our mission to help everyone in our communities be their best and our commitment to setting a new standard for healthcare by delivering a truly personal patient experience combined with convenient access to pioneering, world-class care. We are proud to be Illinois’ third-largest health system with more than 27,000 team members, nine award-winning hospitals and more than 300 clinic locations based in the communities we call home.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,008
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netcare.jpeg
Netcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/endeavor-health.jpeg
Endeavor Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Netcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Endeavor Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Netcare in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Endeavor Health in 2026.

Incident History — Netcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Netcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Endeavor Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Endeavor Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netcare.jpeg
Netcare
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/endeavor-health.jpeg
Endeavor Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Netcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Endeavor Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Endeavor Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Netcare company.

In the current year, Endeavor Health company and Netcare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Endeavor Health company nor Netcare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Endeavor Health company nor Netcare company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Endeavor Health company nor Netcare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Netcare company nor Endeavor Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Netcare nor Endeavor Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Endeavor Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Netcare company.

Endeavor Health company employs more people globally than Netcare company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Netcare nor Endeavor Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Netcare nor Endeavor Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Netcare nor Endeavor Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Netcare nor Endeavor Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Netcare nor Endeavor Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Netcare nor Endeavor Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024. This affects the function setLanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94.

Description

Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A critical security vulnerability in parisneo/lollms versions up to 2.2.0 allows any authenticated user to accept or reject friend requests belonging to other users. The `respond_request()` function in `backend/routers/friends.py` does not implement proper authorization checks, enabling Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attacks. Specifically, the `/api/friends/requests/{friendship_id}` endpoint fails to verify whether the authenticated user is part of the friendship or the intended recipient of the request. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, privacy violations, and potential social engineering attacks. The issue has been addressed in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N