Comparison Overview

Neoenergia

VS

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Neoenergia

Praia do Flamengo, 78, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BR
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.neoenergia.com

Somos uma companhia de capital aberto com ações (NEOE3) negociadas na Bolsa de Valores de São Paulo. Parte do grupo espanhol Iberdrola, atuamos no Brasil desde 1997, e atualmente, somos uma das líderes do setor elétrico do país. Estamos presentes em 18 estados e no Distrito Federal, com negócios em toda cadeia do setor elétrico: geração, transmissão, distribuição e comercialização. Nossas distribuidoras de energia, Neoenergia Coelba (BA), Neoenergia Pernambuco (PE), Neoenergia Cosern (RN), Neoenergia Elektro (SP/MS) e Neoenergia Brasília (DF) atendem a 16,5 milhões de clientes, o equivalente a uma população superior a 37 milhões de pessoas. Atuamos na geração, transmissão, distribuição e comercialização de energia e nossa matriz energética é 90% renovável! Por meio do Instituto Neoenergia, fomentamos o desenvolvimento sustentável a partir de ações socioambientais e, assim, contribuimos para a melhoria da qualidade de vida das comunidades onde estamos presentes, sobretudo, pessoas mais vulneráveis, visando sempre pelo desenvolvimento sustentável.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 12,051
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Maxwell Drive, Sunninghill , Johannesburg, 2191, ZA
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eskom.co.za

Company profile Eskom Holdings generates, transports and distributes approximately 95% of South Africa’s electricity – making up 60% of the total electricity consumed on the African continent. Eskom is the world’s eleventh-largest power utility in terms of generating capacity, ranks ninth in terms of sales, and boasts the world's largest dry-cooling power station. Eskom Holdings’ Enterprises Division designs, builds and refurbishes Eskom’s assets, and acts as a catalyst for project development for the group. Eskom Enterprises’ main focus is to support Eskom Holdings and be the custodian of non-regulated businesses and offer strategic and commercial lifecycle services to the line divisions.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 42,212
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neoenergia.jpeg
Neoenergia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eskom.jpeg
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Neoenergia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neoenergia in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd in 2026.

Incident History — Neoenergia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neoenergia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neoenergia.jpeg
Neoenergia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eskom.jpeg
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Neoenergia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Neoenergia company has not reported any.

In the current year, Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company and Neoenergia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company nor Neoenergia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company nor Neoenergia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Neoenergia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Neoenergia company nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Neoenergia nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neoenergia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company.

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company employs more people globally than Neoenergia company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Neoenergia nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Neoenergia nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Neoenergia nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Neoenergia nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Neoenergia nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Neoenergia nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References