NNASA
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
nasa
Website:
Employees number:
50,451
Number of followers:
6,877,886
NAICS:
3364
Industry Type:
Homepage:
nasa.gov
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
NAS_4658716
Scan Status:
In-progress
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score
nasa.govFor more than 60 years, NASA has been breaking barriers to achieve the seemingly impossible—from walking on the Moon to pushing the boundaries of human spaceflight farther than ever before. We work in space and around the world in laboratories and wind tunnels, on airfields and in control rooms to explore some of life’s fundamental mysteries: What’s out there in space? How do we get there? And what can we learn that will make life better here on Earth? We are passionate professionals united by a common purpose: to pioneer the future in space exploration, scientific discovery and aeronautics research. Today, we continue NASA’s legacy of excellence and innovation through an unprecedented array of missions. We are developing the most advanced rockets and spacecraft ever designed, studying the Earth for answers to critical challenges facing our planet, improving the air transportation experience, and so much more. Join us as we reach for new heights and reveal the unknown for the benefit of humanity.
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
NNASA Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 849
NNASA
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
NNASA Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
NNASA
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
NNASA Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
3
Attack Types
3
NASA
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: A small but persistent air leak in a Russian compartment of the International Space Station has prompted NASA and Axiom Space to indefinitely delay the launch of a commercial flight to the orbiting outpost. The flight was delayed due to high winds and an oxygen leak in the Falcon 9 rocket's first stage. NASA engineers needed more time to assess efforts to plug an air leak aboard the ISS in a Russian vestibule known as the PrK. The PrK serves as a passageway between the station's Zvezda module and spacecraft docked at its aft port.
NASA
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences
Description: Vulnerabilities in open source software developed and used in-house by NASA could be exploited to breach their systems. Security researcher Leon Juranić discovered stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities in NASA’s software, which could allow for remote code execution. These vulnerabilities were found in tools such as QuIP, OpenVSP, RHEAS, OMINAS, Refine, CFDTOOLS, and the knife library. Juranić also found reflected XSS vulnerabilities and hard-coded secret values in NASA’s web applications. State-sponsored threat actors could exploit these flaws to compromise NASA's systems and those of other institutions using the vulnerable software.
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: NASA’s computers were shut down for about 21 days by a young hacker in 1999. The hacker was able to gain access to 13 computers at the Marshall Space Flight Center and downloaded $1.7 million worth of NASA proprietary software. He was able to access thousands of messages, usernames, passwords, and source code for the International Space Station. The attack cost NASA a total of $41,000 to get systems back on track.
NNASA Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for NNASA
Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration in 2026.
Incident Types NNASA vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration in 2026.
Incident History — NNASA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NNASA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
NNASA Company Subsidiaries
For more than 60 years, NASA has been breaking barriers to achieve the seemingly impossible—from walking on the Moon to pushing the boundaries of human spaceflight farther than ever before. We work in space and around the world in laboratories and wind tunnels, on airfields and in control rooms to explore some of life’s fundamental mysteries: What’s out there in space? How do we get there? And what can we learn that will make life better here on Earth? We are passionate professionals united by a common purpose: to pioneer the future in space exploration, scientific discovery and aeronautics research. Today, we continue NASA’s legacy of excellence and innovation through an unprecedented array of missions. We are developing the most advanced rockets and spacecraft ever designed, studying the Earth for answers to critical challenges facing our planet, improving the air transportation experience, and so much more. Join us as we reach for new heights and reveal the unknown for the benefit of humanity.
Loading...
NNASA Similar Companies
B/E Aerospace
B/E Aerospace is now part of Rockwell Collins. With the acquisition of B/E Aerospace in April 2017, Rockwell Collins is now a world leader in designing, developing and manufacturing cabin interior products and services that deliver innovation, reliability and efficiency. Our broad range of offeri
Pratt & Whitney
Pratt & Whitney, an RTX business, is a global leader in propulsion systems, powering the most advanced aircraft in the world, and we are shaping the future of aviation. Our engines help connect people, grow economies and defend freedom. Our customers depend on us to get where they’re going and back
Airbus
Airbus pioneers sustainable aerospace for a safe and united world. The Company constantly innovates to provide efficient and technologically-advanced solutions in aerospace, defence, and connected services. In commercial aircraft, Airbus designs and manufactures modern and fuel-efficient airliners
A global aerospace company headquartered in Brazil, Embraer has businesses in Commercial and Executive Aviation, Defense & Security, and Agricultural Aviation. The company designs, develops, manufactures and markets aircraft and systems, providing Services and Support to customer after-sales. Sinc
We are building a road to space for the benefit of Earth, humanity’s blue origin. Our team is focused on radically reducing the cost of access to space and harnessing its vast resources while mobilizing future generations to realize this mission. Blue Origin builds reusable rocket engines, launch ve
SpaceX
SpaceX designs, manufactures and launches the world’s most advanced rockets and spacecraft. The company was founded in 2002 by Elon Musk to revolutionize space transportation, with the ultimate goal of making life multiplanetary. SpaceX has gained worldwide attention for a series of historic mil
Spirit AeroSystems
Inventing, designing and building what’s best in aerospace. Spirit AeroSystems is one of the world’s largest manufacturers of aerostructures for commercial airplanes, defense platforms, and business/regional jets. With expertise in aluminum and advanced composite manufacturing solutions, the company
CAE
At CAE, we exist to make the world safer. We deliver cutting-edge training, simulation, and critical operations solutions to prepare aviation professionals and defence forces for the moments that matter. Every day, we empower pilots, cabin crew, maintenance technicians, airlines, business aviation o
Bombardier
Bombardier is a global leader in aviation, focused on designing, manufacturing, and servicing the world's most exceptional business jets. Bombardier’s Challenger and Global aircraft families are renowned for their cutting-edge innovation, cabin design, performance, and reliability. Bombardier has a
.png)
NNASA CyberSecurity News
March 04, 2026 08:00 AM
Q&A: Zach Song discusses cybersecurity in construction projects
Zachary Song is a partner at Steptoe in New York and a panellist at this year's Inter-Pacific Bar Association (IPBA) conference for the day...
January 22, 2026 08:00 AM
The NASA CIO Still Has A Lot Of Things To Fix
Keith's note: According to this GAO report: “Chief Information Officer Open Recommendations: National Aeronautics and Space Administration“:...
January 19, 2026 08:00 AM
NASA takes unusual step to secure future of air travel
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has turned to blockchain technology to enhance air travel safety and security.
January 07, 2026 08:00 AM
Doncaster computer buff hacks NASA - and gets letter of praise from space agency
A Doncaster computer buff has revealed he hacked into space agency NASA – and was then praised by bosses at the US organisation for his...
October 17, 2025 07:00 AM
Recent developments in FCA cybersecurity enforcement for government contractors
The U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has kept busy this summer in pursuing cybersecurity-related fraud in government contracts resulting...
September 13, 2025 07:00 AM
NASA Bans Chinese Nationals Amid Rising "Space Race" Tensions
TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - The United States' National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has officially banned Chinese nationals from...
September 11, 2025 07:00 AM
NASA’s restriction on Chinese nationals with US visas working on agency programs reflects growing anxiety; move hardly helps achieve desired goal: expert
Amid China's continuous progress in space exploration programs, and against the background of increasing anti-China hysteria in Washington,...
September 10, 2025 07:00 AM
NASA Blocks Chinese Citizens With US Visas From Working on Space Programs
NASA has blocked Chinese citizens with US visas from working on agency programs, people familiar with the matter said, as Washington...
August 08, 2025 07:00 AM
Cyber risks of cloud computing in the ground segment of the space sector
This report examines cyber security risks associated with the use of cloud computing in the ground segment of space systems, particularly in...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
NNASA CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
The official website of NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration is http://www.nasa.gov.
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 802, reflecting their Good security posture.
How many security badges does NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
Does NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration operates primarily in the Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing industry.
Number of Employees at NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration employs approximately 50,451 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s LinkedIn Followers
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 6,877,886 followers.
NAICS Classification of NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration is classified under the NAICS code 3364, which corresponds to Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing.
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/nasa.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
As of April 04, 2026, Rankiteo reports that NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration has an estimated 2,783 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach, Vulnerability and Cyber Attack.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $41 thousand.
How does NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with closing the hatch leading to the prk and the station's aft docking compartment during daily operations, and remediation measures with patching suspect crack and other possible sources of leakage..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: NASA Cyber Attack by Hacker in 1999
Description: NASA’s computers were shut down for about 21 days by a young hacker in 1999. The hacker was able to gain access to 13 computers at the Marshall Space Flight Center and downloaded $1.7 million worth of NASA proprietary software. He was able to access thousands of messages, usernames, passwords, and source code for the International Space Station. The attack cost NASA a total of $41,000 to get systems back on track.
Type: Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Threat Actor: Young Hacker
Title: Vulnerabilities in NASA Open Source Software
Description: Vulnerabilities in open source software developed and used in-house by NASA were discovered by Leon Juranić, security researcher and founder of cybersecurity startup ThreatLeap. The vulnerabilities were found in tools such as QuIP, OpenVSP, RHEAS, OMINAS, Refine, CFDTOOLS, and the knife library. These vulnerabilities include stack-based buffer overflows, reflected cross site scripting (XSS), and hard-coded secret values, which could be exploited for remote code execution.
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: Exploitation of vulnerabilities in software
Vulnerability Exploited: Stack-based buffer overflowReflected cross site scripting (XSS)Hard-coded secret values
Threat Actor: Potential state-sponsored threat actors
Motivation: To compromise computer systems at NASA and other institutions using the vulnerable software
Title: Air Leak in Russian Compartment of the International Space Station
Description: Concern about a small but persistent air leak in a Russian compartment of the International Space Station has prompted NASA and Axiom Space to indefinitely delay this week's launch of a commercial flight to the orbiting outpost.
Date Detected: 2019
Type: Hardware Malfunction
Vulnerability Exploited: Aging hardware
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Cyber Attack NAS214223222
Financial Loss: $41,000
Data Compromised: Messages, Usernames, Passwords, Source code for the international space station
Systems Affected: 13 computers at the Marshall Space Flight Center
Downtime: 21 days
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation NAS829052725
Systems Affected: QuIPOpenVSPRHEASOMINASRefineCFDTOOLSknife library
Incident : Hardware Malfunction NAS449061725
Systems Affected: Russian compartment (PrK) of the ISSZvezda module
Downtime: Indefinite delay of Axiom-4 launch
Operational Impact: Delay in space missions
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $13.67 thousand.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Proprietary Software, Messages, Usernames, Passwords, Source Code and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Cyber Attack NAS214223222
Entity Name: NASA
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Aerospace
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation NAS829052725
Entity Name: NASA
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Aerospace
Location: United States
Incident : Hardware Malfunction NAS449061725
Entity Name: NASA
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Space Exploration
Location: Houston, Texas
Incident : Hardware Malfunction NAS449061725
Entity Name: Axiom Space
Entity Type: Private Company
Industry: Space Exploration
Incident : Hardware Malfunction NAS449061725
Entity Name: Roscosmos
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Space Exploration
Location: Russia
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Hardware Malfunction NAS449061725
Containment Measures: Closing the hatch leading to the PrK and the station's aft docking compartment during daily operations
Remediation Measures: Patching suspect crack and other possible sources of leakage
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Cyber Attack NAS214223222
Type of Data Compromised: Proprietary software, Messages, Usernames, Passwords, Source code
Sensitivity of Data: High
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Patching suspect crack and other possible sources of leakage, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by closing the hatch leading to the prk and the station's aft docking compartment during daily operations and .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation NAS829052725
Lessons Learned: The importance of Secure Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) practices, especially for government agencies and their contractors.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation NAS829052725
Recommendations: Improvement in NASA's software security processes and NASA's SRA (Software Release Authority) policy.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are The importance of Secure Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) practices, especially for government agencies and their contractors.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Improvement in NASA's software security processes and NASA's SRA (Software Release Authority) policy..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Cyber Attack NAS214223222
Source: Cyber Incident Description
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation NAS829052725
Source: Help Net Security
Incident : Hardware Malfunction NAS449061725
Source: CBS News/NASA
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Cyber Incident Description, and Source: Help Net Security, and Source: CBS News/NASA.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Hardware Malfunction NAS449061725
Investigation Status: Ongoing
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Hardware Malfunction NAS449061725
Root Causes: High Cyclic Fatigue Caused By Micro Vibrations, Pressure And Mechanical Stress, Residual Stress, Material Properties, Environmental Exposures,
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Young Hacker and Potential state-sponsored threat actors.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2019.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was $41,000.
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were messages, usernames, passwords, source code for the International Space Station and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was 13 computers at the Marshall Space Flight Center and QuIPOpenVSPRHEASOMINASRefineCFDTOOLSknife library and Russian compartment (PrK) of the ISSZvezda module.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Closing the hatch leading to the PrK and the station's aft docking compartment during daily operations.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were usernames, source code for the International Space Station, passwords and messages.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was The importance of Secure Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) practices, especially for government agencies and their contractors.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Improvement in NASA's software security processes and NASA's SRA (Software Release Authority) policy..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Help Net Security, CBS News/NASA and Cyber Incident Description.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=nasa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
