Muyuan Foodstuff Co., Ltd Company Cyber Security Posture

muyuanfoods.com

牧原专注养猪28年,形成了以生猪养殖为核心业务,集生猪育种、粮食贸易、饲料加工、生猪屠宰、生态农业、金融、电商等于一体的综合型现代化企业集团,现已布局至全国24省(区、市),拥有子公司270余家。在养殖行业的发展历程中,牧原通过跨界颠覆引领智能养猪,以科技创新推动行业变革,始终致力于为社会生产健康食品,提升大众生活品质,让人们享受丰盛人生。 牧原在万亿级行业市场上构建了蓬勃发展的事业大平台,一群平凡的牧原人干成了这份不平凡的事业。现在,邀你加入牧原大家庭,和10万牧原人一起改变行业,塑造未来! Muyuan has been focusing on pig farming for 28 years. With pig farming as its core business, Muyuan has developed into an integrated modern enterprise group covering pig breeding, grain trade, feed processing, pig slaughtering, eco-agriculture, financing, e-commerce, and so on. At present, the group’s business covers 24 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) across China with over 270 subsidiaries. In the development of its livestock farming, Muyuan has led the way in intelligent pig raising through cross-border innovation, promoting industrial reform with scientific and technological advances. It has always been committed to producing healthy food for society, improving the quality of life of the public, and enabling people to enjoy a richer life. Muyuan has built a thriving business platform in this trillion-yuan-level market. A group of ordinary Muyuan People have realized this extraordinary vocation. Now, we invite you to join our Muyuan family, to change industries and shape futures with over 100 thousand Muyuan People!

MFCL Company Details

Linkedin ID:

muyuan-foodstuff-co-ltd

Employees number:

1425 employees

Number of followers:

3182.0

NAICS:

311

Industry Type:

Food and Beverage Manufacturing

Homepage:

muyuanfoods.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

MUY_1331531

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreMFCL Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

Ailogo

Muyuan Foodstuff Co., Ltd Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

Muyuan Foodstuff Co., Ltd Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
0
Attack Types
0
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView

Muyuan Foodstuff Co., Ltd Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

牧原专注养猪28年,形成了以生猪养殖为核心业务,集生猪育种、粮食贸易、饲料加工、生猪屠宰、生态农业、金融、电商等于一体的综合型现代化企业集团,现已布局至全国24省(区、市),拥有子公司270余家。在养殖行业的发展历程中,牧原通过跨界颠覆引领智能养猪,以科技创新推动行业变革,始终致力于为社会生产健康食品,提升大众生活品质,让人们享受丰盛人生。 牧原在万亿级行业市场上构建了蓬勃发展的事业大平台,一群平凡的牧原人干成了这份不平凡的事业。现在,邀你加入牧原大家庭,和10万牧原人一起改变行业,塑造未来! Muyuan has been focusing on pig farming for 28 years. With pig farming as its core business, Muyuan has developed into an integrated modern enterprise group covering pig breeding, grain trade, feed processing, pig slaughtering, eco-agriculture, financing, e-commerce, and so on. At present, the group’s business covers 24 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) across China with over 270 subsidiaries. In the development of its livestock farming, Muyuan has led the way in intelligent pig raising through cross-border innovation, promoting industrial reform with scientific and technological advances. It has always been committed to producing healthy food for society, improving the quality of life of the public, and enabling people to enjoy a richer life. Muyuan has built a thriving business platform in this trillion-yuan-level market. A group of ordinary Muyuan People have realized this extraordinary vocation. Now, we invite you to join our Muyuan family, to change industries and shape futures with over 100 thousand Muyuan People!

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=muyuan-foodstuff-co-ltd' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

MFCL Cyber Security News

2025-07-06T02:07:00.000Z
Ingram Micro Issues Statement Regarding Cybersecurity Incident

Ingram Micro recently identified ransomware on certain of its internal systems. Promptly after learning of the issue, the Company took steps to ...

2025-07-06T00:21:00.000Z
Qantas attack reveals one phone call is all it takes to crack cybersecurity’s weakest link: humans

Other sectors also at risk from attacks, including healthcare, finance and telecommunications, expert warns.

2025-07-06T07:25:00.000Z
3 Top Cybersecurity Stocks to Buy in July

Three of the best cybersecurity stocks you can buy in July are Check Point Software Technologies (CHKP 1.93%), International Business Machines ( ...

2025-07-05T21:03:29.000Z
Cyber Alert Karnataka: Cybersecurity Deficit Exposed as Attacks Surge

Digital Safety India: Karnataka faces Rs 2915 crore in cybercrime losses in 2024, exposing major cybersecurity gaps across sectors.

2025-07-04T07:53:00.000Z
TIKA leads cybersecurity education for Syrian professionals | Daily Sabah

With the increasing global importance of cybersecurity, TIKA and MAPS conducted a foundational-level cybersecurity training at Damascus ...

2025-07-06T12:00:00.000Z
How Sacramento transgender cybersecurity expert doubles as an activist | Opinion

A Black transgender cybersecurity expert & data scientist from the Capitol region, uses her skills & voice to advocate for LGBTQ+ rights ...

2025-07-06T09:57:51.000Z
FBI Sounds Alarm As Airline Cyber Threats Escalate

The FBI warns that America's airlines are under cyberattack. As digital threats escalate, experts fear a coordinated hack could cripple ...

2025-07-06T14:41:00.000Z
Ingram Micro Confirms Ransomware Attack, Working To Restore Systems To ‘Process And Ship Orders’

Bleeping Computer reported Saturday that Ingram Micro has been hit with a ransomware attack associated with the Safepay ransomware organization.

2025-07-04T12:59:00.000Z
NightEagle APT Exploits Microsoft Exchange Flaw to Target China's Military and Tech Sectors

Cybersecurity researchers uncover NightEagle APT exploiting zero-day in Microsoft Exchange servers, targeting government, defense, ...

similarCompanies

MFCL Similar Companies

FrieslandCampina

FrieslandCampina is a large international dairy company with a cooperative history dating back more than 150 years. The company processes milk into a wide range of dairy products and ingredients. Royal FrieslandCampina N.V. is fully owned by Zuivelcoöperatie FrieslandCampina U.A., with 14,634 dairy

Louis Dreyfus Company

Louis Dreyfus Company is a leading merchant and processor of agricultural goods. We leverage our global reach and extensive asset network to serve our customers and consumers around the world, delivering the right products to the right location, at the right time – safely, responsibly and reliably.

Alfa Corporativo

ALFA es una empresa que administra negocios líderes con operaciones globales: Sigma: Compañía global con más de 44 mil colaboradores para ofrecer los alimentos favoritos a las comunidades a través de 51 marcas líderes, 183 centros de distribución, más de medio millón de puntos de venta y presencia

Bimbo Bakeries USA

Have you ever started your morning with a Thomas’® English muffin or bagel? Or bitten into the perfect slice of Sara Lee® bread? Do you break open a fresh box of Entenmann’s® donuts at family gatherings? If so, you’re already a fan of Bimbo Bakeries USA – the powerhouse behind these iconic brands!

The Campbell's Company

Since 1869, we’ve been connecting people through food they love. Our history was created by remarkable people, ideas and innovations. We are stewards of amazing brands. We have a focused strategy and leading brands in our two divisions: Meals & Beverages and Snacks. We foster a culture of belonging

Nutreco

Nutreco is a global leader in animal nutrition and aquafeed. Our advanced nutritional solutions are at the origin of food for millions of consumers worldwide. Quality, innovation and sustainability are guiding principles, embedded in the Nutreco culture from research and raw material procurement

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

MFCL CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, MFCL has faced 0 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, MFCL has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as 牧原专注养猪28年,形成了以生猪养殖为核心业务,集生猪育种、粮食贸易、饲料加工、生猪屠宰、生态农业、金融、电商等于一体的综合型现代化企业集团,现已布局至全国24省(区、市),拥有子公司270余家。在养殖行业的发展历程中,牧原通过跨界颠覆引领智能养猪,以科技创新推动行业变革,始终致力于为社会生产健康食品,提升大众生活品质,让人们享受丰盛人生。 牧原在万亿级行业市场上构建了蓬勃发展的事业大平台,一群平凡的牧原人干成了这份不平凡的事业。现在,邀你加入牧原大家庭,和10万牧原人一起改变行业,塑造未来! Muyuan has been focusing on pig farming for 28 years. With pig farming as its core business, Muyuan has developed into an integrated modern enterprise group covering pig breeding, grain trade, feed processing, pig slaughtering, eco-agriculture, financing, e-commerce, and so on. At present, the group’s business covers 24 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) across China with over 270 subsidiaries. In the development of its livestock farming, Muyuan has led the way in intelligent pig raising through cross-border innovation, promoting industrial reform with scientific and technological advances. It has always been committed to producing healthy food for society, improving the quality of life of the public, and enabling people to enjoy a richer life. Muyuan has built a thriving business platform in this trillion-yuan-level market. A group of ordinary Muyuan People have realized this extraordinary vocation. Now, we invite you to join our Muyuan family, to change industries and shape futures with over 100 thousand Muyuan People!.

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge