Mossack Fonseca & Co. Company Cyber Security Posture

mossfon.com

Established in 1977, Mossack Fonseca has become a global leader in the creation of legal structures designed for asset protection, management and control. Over 450 employees worldwide. MISSION To deliver to our global client base, an integrated approach involving legal, fiduciary, investment advisory and digital solutions, of a qualified and reliable nature, through the various business components within the MF group, our worldwide network of offices, a highly skilled staff, our trademark utilization of technology, in order to satisfy client demand by adding value, and at the same time generate returns for our directors, employees and community in general. VISSION To be recognized as THE local and international leader in the provision of legal, trust, investment advisory and digital solutions; by virtue of our established business network, and through our continuing commitment to client satisfaction and excellence. CORE VALUES Discipline, Responsibility, Efficiency, Initiative, Honesty, Loyalty, Commitment, Innovation, Excellence in Client Satisfaction.

MF&C Company Details

Linkedin ID:

mossack-fonseca-&-co-

Employees number:

117 employees

Number of followers:

2228

NAICS:

541

Industry Type:

Legal Services

Homepage:

mossfon.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

MOS_2924198

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreMF&C Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

Ailogo

Mossack Fonseca & Co. Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

Mossack Fonseca & Co. Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView
Mossack Fonseca & Co.Data Leak85304/2016MOS2154271023Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: The Panama Papers are an enormous collection of legally secret documents that were posted online by the Panamanian legal firm Mossack Fonseca. Over 11.5 million files, including 2.6 Terabytes of data pertaining to the operations of offshore shell firms utilised by the world's most influential individuals, are contained in the firm's full collection. Ramon Fonseca, a co-founder of the Mossack Fonseca law firm, attested to the validity of the leaked documents to Channel 2 in Panama. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) and an unnamed source turned over the Panama Papers documents to the German publication Suddeutsche Zeitung.

Mossack Fonseca & Co. Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Established in 1977, Mossack Fonseca has become a global leader in the creation of legal structures designed for asset protection, management and control. Over 450 employees worldwide. MISSION To deliver to our global client base, an integrated approach involving legal, fiduciary, investment advisory and digital solutions, of a qualified and reliable nature, through the various business components within the MF group, our worldwide network of offices, a highly skilled staff, our trademark utilization of technology, in order to satisfy client demand by adding value, and at the same time generate returns for our directors, employees and community in general. VISSION To be recognized as THE local and international leader in the provision of legal, trust, investment advisory and digital solutions; by virtue of our established business network, and through our continuing commitment to client satisfaction and excellence. CORE VALUES Discipline, Responsibility, Efficiency, Initiative, Honesty, Loyalty, Commitment, Innovation, Excellence in Client Satisfaction.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=mossack-fonseca-&-co-' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

MF&C Cyber Security News

2025-04-02T17:58:15.000Z
Timothy Howard

Tim Howard is a partner in our New York office, where his practice concentrates on white collar and government investigations, as well as data security,ย ...

2024-07-01T07:00:00.000Z
Leader of hacked โ€˜Panama Papersโ€™ law firm is one of 28 people acquitted

A Panamanian judge has acquitted 28 people, including a founder of Mossack Fonseca, in a money laundering case partly stemming from documents hacked from theย ...

2016-04-06T07:00:00.000Z
The security flaws at the heart of the Panama Papers

A massive leak from Panama City-based law firm Mossack Fonseca has exposed the tax dealings of scores of world leaders and celebrities.

2016-04-21T07:00:00.000Z
Cybersecurity Lessons Learned From 'Panama Papers' Breach

A single cyberattack against Mossack Fonseca, a quiet Panamanian law firm, has sent a tsunami around the world, toppling one world leader so far.

2024-05-09T07:00:00.000Z
Panama Papers law firm co-founder Ramon Fonseca dies in hospital, lawyer says

Ramon Fonseca, who co-founded the now defunct law firm linked to the Panama Papers scandal, died overnight in hospital, his lawyer toldย ...

2016-05-04T07:00:00.000Z
Panama Papers revelation: we must rethink data security systems

The surge of information leaks from highly confidential sources in recent years demonstrates the futility of current cyber defenses.

2016-04-05T07:00:00.000Z
5 charts that explain the Panama Papers

The Panama Papers represent the biggest leak the world has ever seen. The 2.6 terabytes of data, containing 11.5 million documents,ย ...

2016-04-05T07:00:00.000Z
Panama Papers: Who is responsible for Mossack Fonseca email server leak?

Panama-based law firm Mossack Fonseca have blamed 'hackers' on the 2.6 terabytes that were compromised.

2016-05-09T07:00:00.000Z
How Mossack Fonseca could have prevented the 'Panama Papers' breach

The size of the data breach at the law firm of Mossack Fonseca in Panama comprised over 2.6 terabytes of data โ€“ 11.5 million documentsย ...

similarCompanies

MF&C Similar Companies

Ankara Bar Association

Ankara Bar Association Is A Constitutional Public Professional Organization. It is a "Legal Entity As A Public Professional Organization," In Addition To Its Mission To Develop The Legal Profession, The Ankara Bar Association Is Also Charged With Strengthening And Protecting The Concepts Of The

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

MF&C CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, MF&C has faced 1 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Data Leak'].

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Established in 1977, Mossack Fonseca has become a global leader in the creation of legal structures designed for asset protection, management and control. Over 450 employees worldwide. MISSION To deliver to our global client base, an integrated approach involving legal, fiduciary, investment advisory and digital solutions, of a qualified and reliable nature, through the various business components within the MF group, our worldwide network of offices, a highly skilled staff, our trademark utilization of technology, in order to satisfy client demand by adding value, and at the same time generate returns for our directors, employees and community in general. VISSION To be recognized as THE local and international leader in the provision of legal, trust, investment advisory and digital solutions; by virtue of our established business network, and through our continuing commitment to client satisfaction and excellence. CORE VALUES Discipline, Responsibility, Efficiency, Initiative, Honesty, Loyalty, Commitment, Innovation, Excellence in Client Satisfaction..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge