
Microsoft AI Company Cyber Security Posture
https://microsoft.aiAt MAI, we are pioneering the future of what AI and consumer technology can be.
Microsoft AI Company Details
microsoft-ai
5,001-10,000 employees
29068
511
Software Development
https://microsoft.ai
Scan still pending
MIC_1168936
In-progress

Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

.png)

Microsoft AI Company Scoring based on AI Models
Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Microsoft AI Company Cyber Security News & History
Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft | Breach | 100 | 5 | 03/2022 | MIC04123322 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization's existenceDescription: Microsoft's Azure DevOps server was compromised in an attack by the Lapsus$ hacking group. The attackers leaked about a 9 GB zip archive containing the source code for Bing, Cortana, and other projects. Some of the compromised data contain emails and documentation that were clearly used internally by Microsoft engineers. | |||||||
GitHub | Breach | 100 | 6 | 04/2022 | GIT102016422 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the economy of a geographical regionDescription: An unknown attacker is using stolen OAuth user tokens to download data from private repositories on Github. The attacker has already accessed and stolen data from dozens of victim organizations. Github immediately took action and started notifying all the impacted users and organizations about the security breach. | |||||||
Microsoft | Breach | 100 | 4 | 09/2022 | MIC01121122 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: Some of the sensitive information of Microsoft customers was exposed by a misconfigured Microsoft server accessible over the Internet in September 2022. The exposed information includes names, email addresses, email content, company name, and phone numbers, as well as files linked to business between affected customers and Microsoft or an authorized Microsoft partner. However, the leak was caused by the "unintentional misconfiguration on an endpoint that is not in use across the Microsoft ecosystem" but the SOCRadar claimed to link this sensitive information to more than 65,000 entities from 111 countries stored in files dated from 2017 to August 2022. | |||||||
Microsoft | Breach | 100 | 5 | 09/2023 | MIC01021023 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: A vulnerability in Microsoft's Exchange email system allowed threat actors with ties to China to steal about 60,000 emails from the US State Department. The accounts of State Department personnel that were compromised were mostly used for diplomatic operations in the Indo-Pacific, and the hackers also obtained a list of all the department's correspondence. Approximately 60,000 unclassified emails were exfiltrated as a result of that breach. No, confidential systems weren't violated. These concerned only the unclassified system. The threat actors employed forged authentication credentials to access user email accounts via Outlook Web Access in Exchange Online (OWA) and Outlook.com, according to Microsoft researchers. | |||||||
GitHub | Breach | 100 | 5 | 7/2024 | GIT001072724 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: A network named Stargazer Goblin manipulated GitHub to promote malware and phishing links, impacting the platform's integrity by boosting malicious repositories' popularity using ghost accounts. These activities aimed to deceive users seeking free software into downloading ransomware and info-stealer malware, compromising user data and potentially causing financial and reputational harm to both GitHub and its users. GitHubโs response was to disable accounts in violation of their policies and continue efforts to detect and remove harmful content. | |||||||
Microsoft | Breach | 100 | 5 | 8/2024 | MIC001081724 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: Microsoft's AI-powered Copilot exposed to security vulnerabilities where a hacker could access sensitive information such as employee salaries by bypassing file reference protections. Attackers can also manipulate AI to provide their own bank details, glean insights from upcoming financial reports, and trick users into visiting phishing websites. The exploitation of post-compromise AI introduces new risks since it aids attackers in bypassing controls and extracting internal system prompts, leading to unauthorized data access and operations. | |||||||
Microsoft | Breach | 50 | 2 | 12/2024 | MIC001010225 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: Microsoft faced privacy concerns regarding their newly launched AI feature named Recall. Recall captures screenshots every five seconds to assist users in retrieving online activities such as recipes or documents. However, despite safety measures, it was discovered that Recall could capture sensitive information such as credit card numbers and Social Security numbers, even with the 'filter sensitive information' setting active. There were gaps identified when sensitive data was entered into a Notepad window or a loan application PDF within Microsoft Edge, which raised alarm within the privacy and security community, leading to significant scrutiny and potential loss of trust from users. | |||||||
GitHub | Breach | 85 | 4 | 2/2025 | GIT000030225 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: The GitVenom campaign has aggressively targeted gamers and crypto investors, utilizing GitHub as a platform for hosting malicious projects. With a multitude of fake repositories that contained harmful code, the campaign has deceived users with seemingly legitimate automation tools and crypto bots. The impact of GitVenom included credential theft, unauthorized cryptocurrency transactions, and remote system control through backdoors. The damage extended to personal data compromise and financial losses for the affected users, while also tarnishing GitHub's reputation as a safe space for developers to share code. | |||||||
GitHub | Breach | 60 | 2 | 3/2025 | GIT344032125 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: GitHub repositories were compromised, leading to the exposure of install action tokens which fortunately had a limited 24-hour lifespan, thus reducing the risk of widespread exploitation. Endor Labs found that other sensitive credentials like those for Docker, npm, and AWS were also leaked, although many repositories adhered to security best practices by referencing commit SHA values rather than mutable tags, mitigating the potential damage. Despite the reduced impact, due to the potential for threat actors to leverage GitHub Actions, users are advised to implement stricter file and folder access controls to enhance security measures and prevent similar incidents in the future. | |||||||
GitHub | Cyber Attack | 100 | 5 | 08/2015 | GIT105924422 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization's existenceDescription: GitHub was hit by a major DDoS attack that made the website unavailable to many users for several hours. The attackers injected malicious JavaScript code into the pages of those websites that were responsible for the hijacking of their visitors to Github. Github investigated the incident and removed several repositories to secure its servers. | |||||||
Microsoft | Cyber Attack | 60 | 2 | 07/2023 | MIC20599723 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: Microsoft suffered severe outages for some of its services, including Outlook email, OneDrive file-sharing apps, and Azure's cloud computing infrastructure. The DDoS attacks that targeted the business's services were allegedly carried out by a group going by the name of Anonymous Sudan (also known as Storm-1359). In a report titled Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, the IT giant later acknowledged it had been the target of DDoS assaults. Still, he did not disclose further information regarding the outage. The business emphasized that they had not found proof of unauthorized access to or compromise of client data. | |||||||
GitHub | Cyber Attack | 100 | 5 | 7/2024 | GIT000072524 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: GitHub, a prominent code-hosting platform, experienced manipulation of its pages through the use of 'ghost' accounts, as uncovered by Check Point researchers. The cybercriminal known as 'Stargazer Goblin' managed a network of approximately 3,000 fake accounts to promote malware and phishing links by artificially boosting the popularity of malicious repositories. This deceptive action not only jeopardized the integrity of GitHub's community tools but also posed risks to users by distributing malware and info-stealers, like the Atlantida Stealer, under the guise of legitimate software offerings. The platform's extensive user base heightened the potential damage, leading to GitHub's intervention to disable accounts that breach its Acceptable Use Policies. | |||||||
Microsoft | Cyber Attack | 100 | 5 | 8/2024 | MIC001080924 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: Microsoft experienced a widespread Azure outage impacting various services including Microsoft 365 products like Office and Outlook. This incident was confirmed by Microsoft as a cyberattack, specifically a distributed denial of service (DDoS), disrupting operations by overloading the infrastructure with excessive traffic. The attack lasted around eight hours and affected customers globally. Microsoft's swift identification and response to the attack minimized the direct impact on end-users, but the service interruption highlights the ever-present threat of cyberattacks and the importance of robust cybersecurity measures. | |||||||
Microsoft | Cyber Attack | 85 | 4 | 11/2024 | MIC001110524 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: Microsoft detected Chinese threat actors employing the Quad7 botnet, also known as CovertNetwork-1658 or xlogin, in sophisticated password-spray attacks aimed at stealing credentials. These attacks targeted SOHO devices and VPN appliances, exploiting vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access to Microsoft 365 accounts. The botnet, which includes compromised TP-Link routers, relayed brute-force attacks and enabled further network exploitation. Affected sectors include government, law, defense, and NGOs in North America and Europe. The attackers, identified as Storm-0940, utilized low-volume password sprays to evade detection and maintained persistence within victims' networks for potential datapoints exfiltration. | |||||||
Microsoft | Cyber Attack | 100 | 5 | 2/2025 | MIC000022525 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: A large botnet, composed of over 130,000 devices and attributed to a Chinese-affiliated hacking group, has been targeting Microsoft 365 (M365) accounts through password spraying attacks. By exploiting the use of basic authentication, the botnet bypassed multi-factor authentication (MFA), leveraging stolen credentials. The breach has been ongoing since at least December 2024 and poses significant risks as it operates undetected by exploiting Non-Interactive Sign-In logs. Security teams usually overlook these logs, which conceal the high-volume password spraying attempts. These attacks have had widespread global impacts across numerous M365 tenants, leading to potential compromises in user account security and organizational data integrity. | |||||||
GitHub | Cyber Attack | 85 | 4 | 2/2025 | GIT000030125 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: The GitVenom malware campaign primarily targets GitHub users, particularly gamers and crypto investors, by masquerading as open-source projects. These fake repositories contained malicious scripts with the potential to download further nefarious components and execute them. The campaign, active for years with most infection attempts in Russia, Brazil, and Turkey, managed to compromise GitHub accounts, credentials, and crypto data, executing operations such as the theft of cryptocurrency and installing backdoors for remote access. Financial loss is substantial, reaching approximately 5 BTC, valued at around $485,000 at the time of discovery, affecting users' financial assets and GitHub's reputation as a trusted development platform. | |||||||
Microsoft | Data Leak | 50 | 2 | 01/2020 | MIC234171222 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: Microsoft experienced massive data breach affecting anonymized data held on its customer support database. The data breach affected up to 250 million people as a result of the tech giant failing to implement proper protections. The information compromised included email addresses, IP addresses and support case details. | |||||||
Microsoft | Data Leak | 25 | 1 | 02/2016 | MIC41021823 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack without any consequencesDescription: The database that drives m.careersatmicrosoft.com was handled by a mobile web development company that Microsoft relied on, and it was accessible without any authentication for a few weeks. All signs pointed to the database, which was a MongoDB instance, not being write-protected. Therefore, an attacker may have altered the database and, as a result, the HTML code of the job listing pages throughout the disclosed time period. Everything was secured once Chris Vickery informed Punchkick and Microsoft of the issue. | |||||||
microsoft-ai | Data Leak | 60 | 3 | 09/2023 | MIC33924923 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: The Microsoft AI research division unintentionally published 38TB of critical information while posting a container of open-source training data on GitHub, according to cybersecurity company Wiz. Secrets, private keys, passwords, and more than 30,000 internal Microsoft Teams communications were discovered in a disk backup of the workstations of two workers that was made public by the disclosed data. Wiz emphasized that because Microsoft does not offer a centralized method to manage SAS tokens within the Azure interface, it is difficult to track them. Microsoft claimed that the data lead did not reveal customer data, that no customer data was leaked, and that this vulnerability did not put any internal services at risk. | |||||||
GitHub | Data Leak | 25 | 1 | 01/2023 | GIT205981023 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack without any consequencesDescription: The GitHub Desktop for Mac and Atom programs, GitHub confirmed that threat actors exfiltrated encrypted code signing certificates. Customer data was not affected, the company claimed, because it was not kept in the affected repositories. According to the business, there is no proof that the threat actor was able to use or decrypt these certificates. According to the business, neither GitHub.com nor any of its other services have been affected by the security compromise. | |||||||
Microsoft | Data Leak | 85 | 3 | 06/2017 | MIC2321251123 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: A massive dump of Microsoft's proprietary internal builds for Windows 10 has been published online, along with the source codes for proprietary software. This is the largest leak affecting Windows products; the data in the dump were probably stolen from Microsoft computers in March. Microsoft's Shared Source Kit, which comprises the source code for the Microsoft PnP and base Windows 10 hardware drivers as well as storage drivers, USB and Wi-Fi stacks, and ARM-specific OneCore kernel code, has been released. Top-secret versions of Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016 that have never been made public are included in the dump. | |||||||
GitHub | Data Leak | 50 | 1 | 05/2018 | GIT432251223 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack without any consequencesDescription: GitHub, the top software development platform in the world, made some users reset their passwords after discovering an issue that resulted in credentials being recorded in plain text in internal logs. A routine corporate audit uncovered the problem, which involved some users sharing on Twitter the email correspondence that the organisation had received. The business promptly stated that user data was safe and that none of its systems had been compromised. The business further stated that the plaintext passwords were not publicly available and could only be seen by a limited number of its IT workers through internal log files. | |||||||
GitHub | Ransomware | 100 | 4 | 05/2019 | GIT02020323 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: GitHub experienced a ransomware attack which include at least 392 GitHub repositories. Some users who fell victim to this hacker have admitted to using weak passwords for their GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket accounts. However, all evidence suggests that the hacker has scanned the entire internet for Git config files, extracted credentials, and then used these logins to access and ransom accounts at Git hosting services. It was found that Hundreds of developers have had Git source code repositories wiped and replaced with a ransom demand. | |||||||
Microsoft | Ransomware | 75 | 2 | 3/2025 | MIC613032125 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: The VSCode Marketplace, operated by Microsoft, suffered a security lapse when two extensions embedding in-development ransomware bypassed the review process. These extensions, downloaded by a handful of users, aimed to encrypt files within a specific test folder and demanded a ransom in ShibaCoin. While the impact was minimal due to the ransomware's limited scope, it revealed significant gaps in Microsoft's review system. This incident sheds light on potential vulnerabilities within widely used developer platforms and highlights the importance of stringent security measures to prevent such breaches. | |||||||
Microsoft Cloud | Vulnerability | 100 | 6 | 12/2021 | MIC134612522 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the economy of a geographical regionDescription: A critical vulnerability in Microsoft's Azure Automation service could have permitted unauthorized access to other Azure customer accounts. By exploiting the bug, the attacker could get full control over resources and data belonging to the targeted account, depending on the permissions assigned by the customer. Several companies including a telecommunications company, two car manufacturers, a banking conglomerate, and big four accounting firms, among others, the Israeli cloud infrastructure security company were targeted by exploiting this vulnerability. However, the issue was identified and was remediated in a patch pushed in December 2021. | |||||||
Microsoft Cloud | Vulnerability | 100 | 5 | 05/2022 | MIC113613522 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization's existenceDescription: Microsoft mitigated a security flaw affecting Azure Synapse and Azure Data Factory that could lead to Any malicious actor could have weaponized the bug to acquire the Azure Data Factory service certificate and access another tenant's Integration Runtimes to gain access to sensitive information. However, no evidence of misuse or malicious activity associated with the vulnerability in the wild was reported yet. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 100 | 6 | 06/2022 | MIC14326622 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the economy of a geographical regionDescription: A zero-day remote code execution vulnerability named 'Follina' in Microsoft Office discovered recently has the potential for code execution if a victim opens a malicious document in Word. The vulnerability abuses the ability of MSDT to load other assistants โwizardsโ in Windows, which in turn have the ability to execute arbitrary code from a remote location. It can also allow the attacker to view and edit files, install programs and create new user accounts to the limit of the compromised userโs access rights. The initial versions spotted in the wild required the target to open the malicious document in Word, but the recently discovered variant uses Rich Text Format (.RTF) works only if the user simply selects the file in Windows Explorer. Microsoft has yet not issued a patch but has suggested disabling the MSDT URL Protocol to cut off the attack sequence. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 100 | 5 | 03/2021 | MIC311050724 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: In March 2021, Microsoft encountered a massive security breach that affected over 30,000 organizations in the U.S., ranging from businesses to government agencies. This attack was notably significant due to its broad impact and the exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software. The attackers were able to gain access to email accounts, and also install additional malware to facilitate long-term access to victim environments. Given the scale and the method of attackโexploiting software vulnerabilitiesโthe incident highlighted critical concerns regarding software security and the necessity for timely updates and patches. The breach not only compromised sensitive information but also eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures, pushing the company to swiftly address the vulnerabilities and enhance their security posture to prevent future incidents. The repercussions of the attack underscored the importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilance in a landscape where threats are continuously evolving. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 85 | 4 | 7/2024 | MIC000072624 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: Microsoft faced a cyberattack where the CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability in the Defender SmartScreen was exploited to deliver information stealers such as ACR Stealer, Lumma, and Meduza, affecting users in Spain, Thailand, and the US. Attackers utilized crafted links to bypass security features and install malware that stole data and targeted specific regions. Despite Microsoft releasing a patch for the vulnerability, the attack compromised personal and potentially sensitive information. Organizational cybersecurity defenses were challenged by the innovative methods used by the attackers, underscoring the criticality of awareness and proactive security measures. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 85 | 4 | 12/2024 | MIC000121524 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: In May, Microsoft introduced Recall, an AI that takes screenshots every five seconds for user convenience. However, concerns were raised about privacy and security, leading to delayed launch and modifications. Despite these changes, Tom's Hardware testing revealed the 'filter sensitive information' feature failed to prevent gathering sensitive data. Specifically, Recall captured credit card numbers, social security numbers, and other personal data while filling out a Notepad window and a loan application PDF, compromising users' financial information and privacy. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 100 | 5 | 3/2025 | MIC412030525 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: Microsoft's Windows Key Distribution Center (KDC) Proxy service experienced a significant remote code execution vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2024-43639, which could have allowed unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected servers. The flaw, due to an integer overflow from missing length checks on Kerberos response handling, was patched in November 2024. Had it been exploited, attackers could have gained full control over compromised systems, underlining the critical importance of quick patch deployment in enterprise security. | |||||||
GitHub | Vulnerability | 100 | 5 | 4/2025 | GIT350040225 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: A vulnerability within GitHub's CodeQL, a security analysis tool, was uncovered that had the potential to be exploited, potentially affecting a vast number of public and private repositories. Despite there being no evidence of actual misuse, the flaw could have allowed for the exfiltration of source code and secrets, jeopardizing the security of internal networks including GitHub's own systems. The vulnerability, which involved the exposure of a GitHub token, was quickly addressed by the GitHub team, showcasing their rapid and impressive response. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 60 | 3 | 4/2025 | MIC540040825 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: Microsoft encountered a security challenge when EncryptHub, also known as SkorikARI, a threat actor emerged with skills in vulnerability research. The actor, credited by Microsoft for uncovering two Windows security issues, could potentially compromise users' safety and data. The vulnerabilities, identified as high-severity CVE-2025-24061 and medium-severity CVE-2025-24071, raised concerns over the Mark of the Web security feature and Windows File Explorer, respectively. EncryptHub's background in ransomware and vishing, combined with these recent activities, signifies a mixed threat profile. Although policies and user vigilance can mitigate risks, the presence of these vulnerabilities unveiled by EncryptHub poses a direct threat to Microsoft's systems and its vast user base. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 100 | 5 | 5/2025 | MIC846050725 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: Microsoftโs Azure Prompt Shield, deployed across its AI services including Azure OpenAI and other enterprise platforms, was revealed to harbor a critical security vulnerability through a deceptively simple emoji smuggling technique. Researchers from Mindgard and Lancaster University demonstrated that by embedding malicious instructions within Unicode emoji variation selectors, attackers can bypass the shieldโs content inspection pipeline entirely. Because Azure Prompt Shield fails to normalize or parse these hidden characters in line with the underlying language model, it remains blind to the hidden payload while the model itself executes the commands. In controlled tests, this bypass achieved a perfect 100% success rate, enabling adversaries to unleash unauthorized code execution, data exfiltration attempts, and disallowed content generation. The implications are profound: enterprises relying on Azureโs guardrails may unknowingly expose sensitive intellectual property, customer data, and internal decision-making processes to hostile actors. This flaw not only undermines user trust in Microsoftโs AI safety infrastructure but also highlights an urgent need for more robust Unicode handling and unified guardrail-LM dataset alignment. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 25 | 1 | 5/2025 | MIC632052625 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack without any consequencesDescription: A vulnerability known as BadSuccessor in Windows Server 2025โs delegated Managed Service Account (dMSA) feature has been weaponized by a proof-of-concept exploit tool called SharpSuccessor. This tool allows attackers with minimal Active Directory permissions to escalate privileges to the domain administrator level, raising serious security concerns for enterprise environments worldwide. The vulnerability leverages the dMSA migration mechanism and requires only CreateChild permissions over any Organizational Unit (OU) to function. Exploiting this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access and potential data breaches within organizations. |
Microsoft AI Company Subsidiaries

At MAI, we are pioneering the future of what AI and consumer technology can be.
Access Data Using Our API

Get company history
.png)
Microsoft AI Cyber Security News
Microsoft launches new European Security Program
Increasing AI-based threat intelligence sharing with European governments; ยท Making additional investments to strengthen cybersecurity capacityย ...
Microsoft offers to boost European governments' cybersecurity for free
Microsoft is offering free of charge to European governments a cybersecurity programme, launched on Wednesday, to bolster their defencesย ...
Microsoft's Free Cyber Security Support to European Governments Reflects 'Deep, Enduring, Unwavering' Commitment
Microsoft is helping Europe fight AI-based cyberattacks with a free security program tailored for governments.
ConnectWise Launches AI-Powered PSA, M365 Security Suite With Microsoft And Pax8, Next-Gen SIEM
In collaboration with Microsoft and cloud marketplace Pax8, ConnectWise launched endpoint management and security for M365, a fully integratedย ...
Microsoft makes a 'proactive investment' in EU cybersecurity amid bloc's tensions with US
Microsoft announced on Wednesday it was launching a new European Security Program that would involve the company providing free โAI-basedโย ...
Cybersecurity and AI: How Microsoft Meets a Changing Tech Landscape
Microsoft's products continue to evolve with a changing technological landscape, particularly their flagship Windows Operating System (OS).
Microsoft launches free cybersecurity protection for European governments against AI threats and more
The new European Security Program will provide additional threat intelligence sharing, especially for AI threats, alongside added cybersecurityย ...
Microsoft Expands Security Footprint: Is it the Next Revenue Pillar?
MSFT's cybersecurity push gains speed with AI-driven tools, a growing customer base and a strategic EU initiative.
Europe gets new cybersecurity support from Microsoft
Microsoft has launched a free cybersecurity initiative for European governments aimed at countering increasingly sophisticated cyber threatsย ...

Microsoft AI Similar Companies

Grab
Grab is Southeast Asiaโs leading superapp, offering a suite of services consisting of deliveries, mobility, financial services, enterprise and others. Grabbers come from all over the world, and we are united by a common mission: to drive Southeast Asia forward by creating economic empowerment for ev

Microsoft
Every company has a mission. What's ours? To empower every person and every organization to achieve more. We believe technology can and should be a force for good and that meaningful innovation contributes to a brighter world in the future and today. Our culture doesnโt just encourage curiosity; it

Lazada
About Lazada Group Founded in 2012, Lazada Group is the leading eCommerce platform in Southeast Asia. We are accelerating progress in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam through commerce and technology. With the largest logistics and payments networks in the regio

Atlassian
Atlassian powers the collaboration that helps teams accomplish what would otherwise be impossible alone. From space missions and motor racing to bugs in code and IT requests, no task is too large or too small with the right team, the right tools, and the right practices. Over 300,000 global compa

Bolt
At Bolt, we're building a future where people donโt need to own personal cars to move around safely and conveniently. A future where people have the freedom to use transport on demand, choosing whatever vehicle's best for each occasion โ be it a car, scooter, or e-bike. We're helping over 200 mill

Asseco Poland
Asseco Poland is the largest software producer listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. It has developed technologically advanced software solutions for all key sectors of the economy for over 30 years. Today, Asseco Poland stands at the forefront of the multinational Asseco Group. We are the number o

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Microsoft AI CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Microsoft AI has faced 35 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Ransomware', 'Vulnerability', 'Breach', 'Data Leak', 'Cyber Attack'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as At MAI, we are pioneering the future of what AI and consumer technology can be..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Breach', 'Cyber Attack', 'Data Leak', 'Ransomware', 'Vulnerability'].
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
