Comparison Overview

MV Law

VS

MacMillan Trade Marks

MV Law

Level 2, Canberra, ACT, 2601, AU
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mvlaw.com.au

MV Law is a dynamic Australian commercial law and advisory firm based in Canberra. Formed in 2005 through the merger between Meyer Clapham and Vandenberg Reid, our firm is recognised for providing quality service to all our clients. We undertake work for clients at a local and national level, as well as internationally Our knowledgeable staff offer expert legal advice, with a particular focus in the areas of property, commercial and financial law. The firm’s success is based on delivering excellence and value, with clients ranging from small and medium enterprises to large scale property developers, construction entities, tertiary, banking and financial services institutions. We work with Commonwealth and Territory government agencies, businesses, and individuals wanting to set up their first business or plan for succession.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

MacMillan Trade Marks

AU
Last Update: 2026-03-23
Between 750 and 799
http://macmillantrademarks.com.au

Macmillan Trade Marks is now a part of in-house style essential professional services firm, Source. We are a team of experienced, commercially-minded professionals with a mission to deliver exceptional professional services in a unique way to suit your needs. By combining our forces under one roof, our team offers a full scale legal, governance, risk and compliance department to your business. With Source, our offer is simple – tailored, exceptional support by our entire team, whenever and however you need it. When you work with Source, you’ll gain the power of a fully-fledged in-house style team that works the way you do.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meyer-vandenberg-lawyers.jpeg
MV Law
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macmillan-trademarks.jpeg
MacMillan Trade Marks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MV Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MacMillan Trade Marks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MV Law in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MacMillan Trade Marks in 2026.

Incident History — MV Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MV Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MacMillan Trade Marks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MacMillan Trade Marks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meyer-vandenberg-lawyers.jpeg
MV Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macmillan-trademarks.jpeg
MacMillan Trade Marks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MacMillan Trade Marks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MV Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MacMillan Trade Marks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MV Law company.

In the current year, MacMillan Trade Marks company and MV Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MacMillan Trade Marks company nor MV Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MacMillan Trade Marks company nor MV Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MacMillan Trade Marks company nor MV Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MV Law company nor MacMillan Trade Marks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MV Law nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MV Law company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MacMillan Trade Marks company.

MV Law company employs more people globally than MacMillan Trade Marks company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither MV Law nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MV Law nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MV Law nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MV Law nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MV Law nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MV Law nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References