Mercury IT Company Cyber Security Posture

mercuryit.com.au

Since 2004 we have been committed to delivering honest, independent, and quality IT service. Our life cycle service approach ensures client satisfaction through any number of stages, whether itโ€™s a network and IT systems overhaul, cybersecurity, short-term assistance, additional skills to complement an internal team or a fully outsourced IT department. We work with leading technology companies such as Microsoft (Gold Partner), Cisco (Premier Partner), HP, Citrix, VMware and many other reputable brands to customise business solutions for our clients. Rather than a supplier - customer arrangement, we build a partnership with our customers. As their technology partner, we celebrate our customer's successes as our own. Contact us for complimentary consultation for your business. Mercury IT Gold Coast Office - Unit 6/14-28 Ivan St, Arundel QLD Brisbane | Gold Coast | Sydney | Melbourne | Perth Show more Show less

Mercury IT Company Details

Linkedin ID:

mercuryit

Employees number:

51-200 employees

Number of followers:

2125

NAICS:

541

Industry Type:

IT Services and IT Consulting

Homepage:

mercuryit.com.au

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

MER_2827584

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreMercury IT Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

globalscoreMercury IT Global Score
blurone
Ailogo

Mercury IT Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

Mercury IT Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView
Mercury ITCyber Attack100612/2022MER20871222Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: Mercury IT was recently hit by a ransomware attack that potentially compromised the sensitive data it hosts for its multiple clients in NewZeland, including health insurer Accuro, BusinessNZ, the NZ National Nurses Association and the Ministry of Justice. The government agencies whose data has been impacted in the attack include some providers contracted to Te Whatu Ora, Health NZ. The company immediately investigated the incident to understand the nature of the information involved and the extent to which any information has been copied out of the system and also notified the various organisations.

Mercury IT Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Since 2004 we have been committed to delivering honest, independent, and quality IT service. Our life cycle service approach ensures client satisfaction through any number of stages, whether itโ€™s a network and IT systems overhaul, cybersecurity, short-term assistance, additional skills to complement an internal team or a fully outsourced IT department. We work with leading technology companies such as Microsoft (Gold Partner), Cisco (Premier Partner), HP, Citrix, VMware and many other reputable brands to customise business solutions for our clients. Rather than a supplier - customer arrangement, we build a partnership with our customers. As their technology partner, we celebrate our customer's successes as our own. Contact us for complimentary consultation for your business. Mercury IT Gold Coast Office - Unit 6/14-28 Ivan St, Arundel QLD Brisbane | Gold Coast | Sydney | Melbourne | Perth Show more Show less

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=mercuryit' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

Mercury IT Cyber Security News

2025-05-13T19:30:20.000Z
Cybersecurity software firm Star Lab acquired by Mercury Systems

Star Lab, previously a subsidiary of Wind River Systems, develops software aimed at protecting embedded systems from reverse engineering and data exploitation,ย ...

2025-01-20T08:00:00.000Z
Cybersecurity breach affects Va. school divisions through PowerSchool system

A cybersecurity breach at PowerSchool, a software company that supports school operations, has compromised student, parent and teacherย ...

2025-05-01T07:00:00.000Z
Mercury Systems Completes Acquisition of Star Lab to Enhance Cybersecurity Solutions for Aerospace and Defense Applications

Mercury Systems acquires Star Lab to enhance secure processing capabilities for aerospace and defense applications.

2025-05-02T07:00:00.000Z
Mercury Acquires Star Lab to Enhance Secure Processing

Mercury Systems has finalized the acquisition of Star Lab, in line with efforts to continue advancing the company's capabilities to deliverย ...

2025-05-01T07:00:00.000Z
Mercury Acquires Star Lab to Advance Its Leadership Position in Secure Processing

Mercury expands secure processing capabilities with Star Lab acquisition, enhancing anti-tamper solutions for defense platforms.

2025-03-28T07:00:00.000Z
The Weekโ€™s Biggest Funding Rounds: Fleetio And Mercury Nab Massive Rounds

Seven startups locked up massive rounds of $100 million or more. That includes two cybersecurity firms and two companies in the transportation space.

2024-07-07T07:00:00.000Z
Mercury Cyber Security launches a Solution-Oriented Service in the Crypto Industry

Utilizing advanced forensic technology, the firm enhances security in the digital asset space, aiding victims of crypto theft and fraud.

2024-09-11T07:00:00.000Z
Defense Sector Review with Mercury Strategic: Cybersecurity Challenges and Innovations

Cyber operations must be aligned with traditional military objectives and tactics, which requires a deep understanding of both domains. Inย ...

2025-03-18T07:00:00.000Z
SpaceX cybersecurity engineer tapped for Fannie Mae board amid shakeup

Mortgage giant Fannie Mae has added Christopher Stanley, a cybersecurity engineer at SpaceX and social media platform X โ€” who is also involvedย ...

similarCompanies

Mercury IT Similar Companies

At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and consulting, then we want to work

Apex Systems

Apex Systems is a leading global technology services firm that incorporates industry insights and experience to deliver solutions that fulfill our clientsโ€™ digital visions. We offer a continuum of services, specializing in strategy, transformation, and managed services across application development

At CDW, we know how to make technology work so people can do great things. Our experts bring a full-stack, full-lifestyle approach with custom solutions, services and relationships to bring your vision to life. Through decades of experience, scale, and deep industry expertise, we deliver the full

Algar Tech

Somos a Algar Tech CX. Com 26 anos de mercado, atuamos como parceira de negรณcio para a transformaรงรฃo digital de grandes corporaรงรตes. Nosso portfรณlio possui serviรงos de Relacionamento com o Cliente, que visam melhorar a experiรชncia dos consumidores. Somos mais de 7 mil associados que trabalham com o

Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Consultancy Services is an IT services, consulting and business solutions organization that has been partnering with many of the worldโ€™s largest businesses in their transformation journeys for over 56 years. Our consulting-led, cognitive powered, portfolio of business, technology and engineerin

Elsevier

As a global leader in information and analytics, Elsevier helps researchers and healthcare professionals advance science and improve health outcomes for the benefit of society. We do this by facilitating insights and critical decision-making for customers across the global research and health ecosys

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

Mercury IT CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Mercury IT has faced 1 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack'].

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Since 2004 we have been committed to delivering honest, independent, and quality IT service. Our life cycle service approach ensures client satisfaction through any number of stages, whether itโ€™s a network and IT systems overhaul, cybersecurity, short-term assistance, additional skills to complement an internal team or a fully outsourced IT department. We work with leading technology companies such as Microsoft (Gold Partner), Cisco (Premier Partner), HP, Citrix, VMware and many other reputable brands to customise business solutions for our clients. Rather than a supplier - customer arrangement, we build a partnership with our customers. As their technology partner, we celebrate our customer's successes as our own. Contact us for complimentary consultation for your business. Mercury IT Gold Coast Office - Unit 6/14-28 Ivan St, Arundel QLD Brisbane | Gold Coast | Sydney | Melbourne | Perth Show more Show less.

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge