Comparison Overview

United States Marine Corps

VS

Swedish Armed Forces

United States Marine Corps

3000 Marine Corps Pentagon, Washington, 20350, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.marines.mil/

The United States Marine Corps (USMC) is a branch of the United States Armed Forces responsible for providing power projection, using the mobility of the United States Navy, by Congressional mandate, to deliver rapidly, combined-arms task forces on land, at sea, and in the air. The U.S. Marine Corps is one of the four armed service branches in the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and one of the seven uniformed services of the United States.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 74,252
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Swedish Armed Forces

Lidingövägen 24, Stockholm, SE, 107 85
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799
https://forsvarsmakten.se

The Swedish Armed Forces is one of the biggest authorities in Sweden and is headed by a Supreme Commander. The deputy leader of the authority is the Director General. As the only authority permitted to engage in armed combat, the Swedish Armed Forces are Sweden’s ultimate security policy resource. The Armed Forces are therefore always prepared to carry out international missions, assert Sweden’s national integrity and support Swedish society in major crises. To enable Sweden to maintain its freedom of action in terms of its security policy, the Armed Forces are continuously developing capabilities that can meet future requirements. The Swedish Armed Forces is subject to the Swedish parliament and the Swedish government. As an authority we are governed by laws and regulations passed by them and they also determine the budget we receive. Swedish citizenship is a requirement for joining the Swedish Armed Forces. At present this applies to both military and civilian service.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 15,300
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marines.jpeg
United States Marine Corps
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forsvarsmakten.jpeg
Swedish Armed Forces
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United States Marine Corps
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swedish Armed Forces
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United States Marine Corps in 2026.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swedish Armed Forces in 2026.

Incident History — United States Marine Corps (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Marine Corps cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Swedish Armed Forces (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swedish Armed Forces cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marines.jpeg
United States Marine Corps
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forsvarsmakten.jpeg
Swedish Armed Forces
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

United States Marine Corps company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Swedish Armed Forces company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Swedish Armed Forces company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas United States Marine Corps company has not reported any.

In the current year, Swedish Armed Forces company and United States Marine Corps company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Swedish Armed Forces company nor United States Marine Corps company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Swedish Armed Forces company nor United States Marine Corps company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Swedish Armed Forces company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while United States Marine Corps company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither United States Marine Corps company nor Swedish Armed Forces company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United States Marine Corps nor Swedish Armed Forces holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither United States Marine Corps company nor Swedish Armed Forces company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

United States Marine Corps company employs more people globally than Swedish Armed Forces company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither United States Marine Corps nor Swedish Armed Forces holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United States Marine Corps nor Swedish Armed Forces holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United States Marine Corps nor Swedish Armed Forces holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United States Marine Corps nor Swedish Armed Forces holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United States Marine Corps nor Swedish Armed Forces holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United States Marine Corps nor Swedish Armed Forces holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References