Marienhaus-Gruppe Company Cyber Security Posture

marienhaus.de

Bei der Marienhaus-Gruppe steht der Mensch im Mittelpunkt. Als einer der großen christlichen Träger von sozialen Einrichtungen in Deutschland engagieren wir uns in vielfältiger Weise für Kranke, alte und benachteiligte Menschen, für Kinder und Jugendliche und für Menschen in der letzten Lebensphase. Zur Unternehmensgruppe gehören zahlreiche Krankenhäuser, Alten- und Pflegeheime, Kinder- und Jugendhilfeeinrichtungen, stationäre und ambulante Hospize sowie Bildungseinrichtungen in den Bundesländern Nordrhein-Westfalen, Rheinland-Pfalz und dem Saarland. Zugleich versteht die Gruppe sich auch als moderner Dienstleister und berät und unterstützt die Einrichtungen in Bereichen wie Baumanagement, Einkauf & Logistik, Facility-Management, Informationstechnologie und Medizintechnik. Website: www.marienhaus.de Impressum und Datenschutz: Siehe Link unter "Website".

Marienhaus-Gruppe Company Details

Linkedin ID:

marienhaus-gruppe

Employees number:

403 employees

Number of followers:

2669

NAICS:

62

Industry Type:

Hospitals and Health Care

Homepage:

marienhaus.de

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

MAR_1623416

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreMarienhaus-Gruppe Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 800 and 900

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

globalscoreMarienhaus-Gruppe Global Score
blurone
Ailogo

Marienhaus-Gruppe Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 800 and 900

Marienhaus-Gruppe Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView
Marienhaus-GruppeCyber Attack60312/2023MAR224228124Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: The Marienhaus Group's (MHG) information technology systems were shielded from an attack by proactive security measures and IT's attention. Marienhaus's management promptly enlisted the aid of a leading international cybersecurity firm to supplement their team of professionals. Two workstations and six servers have now been found to be compromised as part of the ongoing assessment. Immediately, the remainder of the network was cut off from these systems. It is now impossible to predict with any degree of accuracy when MHG's IT will be fully operational and unrestricted again due to the complexity of the cyberattack and the need for extensive analysis.

Marienhaus-Gruppe Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Bei der Marienhaus-Gruppe steht der Mensch im Mittelpunkt. Als einer der großen christlichen Träger von sozialen Einrichtungen in Deutschland engagieren wir uns in vielfältiger Weise für Kranke, alte und benachteiligte Menschen, für Kinder und Jugendliche und für Menschen in der letzten Lebensphase. Zur Unternehmensgruppe gehören zahlreiche Krankenhäuser, Alten- und Pflegeheime, Kinder- und Jugendhilfeeinrichtungen, stationäre und ambulante Hospize sowie Bildungseinrichtungen in den Bundesländern Nordrhein-Westfalen, Rheinland-Pfalz und dem Saarland. Zugleich versteht die Gruppe sich auch als moderner Dienstleister und berät und unterstützt die Einrichtungen in Bereichen wie Baumanagement, Einkauf & Logistik, Facility-Management, Informationstechnologie und Medizintechnik. Website: www.marienhaus.de Impressum und Datenschutz: Siehe Link unter "Website".

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=marienhaus-gruppe' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

Marienhaus-Gruppe Cyber Security News

2025-06-30T21:00:27.000Z
A Trio of US Treasury Hacks Exposes a Pattern Making Banks Nervous

In three major hacks, Treasury didn't deploy cybersecurity measures that could have prevented the attacks or flagged the intruders sooner, ...

2025-06-30T17:31:29.000Z
Cybersecurity Threat in the Age of AI: BCF Founder Cordell Robinson Urges a Culture Shift Toward Proactive Protection

“The biggest cyber threat today isn't machine learning; it's the culture of instant gratification that drives human behavior online,” says this ...

2025-06-30T17:50:07.000Z
Why Teachers Need to Take Cybersecurity Seriously

We have to worry about protecting student privacy, keeping them safe in the online space and making sure that we're providing opportunities for ...

2025-07-01T04:00:26.000Z
Cybersecurity jobs available right now: July 1, 2025

Here are the worldwide cybersecurity job openings available as of July 1, 2025, including on-site, hybrid, and remote roles.

2025-06-30T20:17:38.000Z
GAO Recommends Full Implementation of Risk Management Processes at NASA

NASA is planning to invest $80 billion in developing spacecraft and systems for exploring the Earth, the moon and the solar system.

2025-06-30T12:25:10.000Z
Cybersecurity unicorn Cato Networks snags $359m, soaring to $4.8 billion valuation

Cato Networks, a maker of cloud-based, secured networks for large enterprises that lets remote workers connect to applications regardless of ...

2025-06-29T08:55:00.000Z
5 Cybersecurity Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade

5 Cybersecurity Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade ; Palo Alto Networks (NASDAQ: PANW) ; CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) ; Zscaler (NASDAQ: ...

2025-06-29T04:33:14.000Z
CrowdStrike or Check Point: Bank of America Selects the Superior Cybersecurity Stock to Buy

Take advantage of TipRanks Premium for 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.

2025-06-27T16:56:00.000Z
Aloha, you’ve been pwned: Hawaiian Airlines discloses ‘cybersecurity event’

update Hawaiian Airlines said a "cybersecurity incident" affected some of its IT systems, but noted that flights are operating as scheduled.

similarCompanies

Marienhaus-Gruppe Similar Companies

Baylor Scott & White Health

With us by your side, there's no stopping you. It's why we're creating a new kind of healthcare at Baylor Scott & White. And we're just getting started. As the largest not-for-profit health system in the state of Texas, Baylor Scott & White promotes the health and well-being of every individual, fa

Fresenius Group

Committed to Life - We save and improve human lives with affordable, accessible, and innovative healthcare products and the highest quality in clinical care. Fresenius is a global healthcare company headquartered in Bad Homburg v. d. Höhe, Germany. In fiscal year 2023, Fresenius generated €22.3 bil

Karolinska University Hospital

Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset är ett av Europas största universitetssjukhus. Tillsammans med Karolinska Institutet leder vi den medicinska utvecklingen i Sverige. Sjukvård, forskning och utbildning är lika viktiga delar i arbetet för att förlänga och förbättra människors liv. Varje år besöker

El Seguro Social de Salud, EsSalud, es un organismo público descentralizado, con personería jurídica de derecho público interno, adscrito al Sector Trabajo y Promoción Social. Tiene por finalidad dar cobertura a los asegurados y sus derechohabientes, a través del otorgamiento de prestaciones

Centene Corporation

Centene Corporation is a leading healthcare enterprise committed to helping people live healthier lives. Centene offers affordable and high-quality products to more than 1 in 15 individuals across the nation, including Medicaid and Medicare members (including Medicare Prescription Drug Plans) as wel

Addus HomeCare

Addus HomeCare is one of the nation's largest and fastest growing providers of personal home care and support services. Since 1979, Addus has built an exceptional home care company through a commitment to improving the health and wellness of our clients and providing high-quality, cost-effective car

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

Marienhaus-Gruppe CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Marienhaus-Gruppe has faced 1 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack'].

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Bei der Marienhaus-Gruppe steht der Mensch im Mittelpunkt. Als einer der großen christlichen Träger von sozialen Einrichtungen in Deutschland engagieren wir uns in vielfältiger Weise für Kranke, alte und benachteiligte Menschen, für Kinder und Jugendliche und für Menschen in der letzten Lebensphase. Zur Unternehmensgruppe gehören zahlreiche Krankenhäuser, Alten- und Pflegeheime, Kinder- und Jugendhilfeeinrichtungen, stationäre und ambulante Hospize sowie Bildungseinrichtungen in den Bundesländern Nordrhein-Westfalen, Rheinland-Pfalz und dem Saarland. Zugleich versteht die Gruppe sich auch als moderner Dienstleister und berät und unterstützt die Einrichtungen in Bereichen wie Baumanagement, Einkauf & Logistik, Facility-Management, Informationstechnologie und Medizintechnik. Website: www.marienhaus.de Impressum und Datenschutz: Siehe Link unter "Website"..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge