Comparison Overview

Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC

VS

Run8 Patent Group

Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC

None
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 800 and 849

Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman is a full service law firm dedicated to providing every client with individualized legal solutions. Our talented staff and knowledgeable and experienced attorneys work tirelessly to provide every client with the personal attention and custom-tailored legal services every client deserves. When the time comes for you to make crucial decisions about your business, your finances, your property, and your family, we will be there to protect your interests and help you make the best decision. Working with the attorneys at Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman means always having a knowledgeable and experienced team looking out for you. If you have questions about how you can benefit from a relationship with Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, contact us anytime at 502-589-4215. We will be happy to meet with you to discuss how we can serve you.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Run8 Patent Group

None
Last Update: 2026-03-12
Between 700 and 749

After prosecuting hundreds of patent applications over five years of working with startups, Peter Miller founded Run8 Patent Group, a San Francisco Bay Area patent prosecution firm. Leveraging a deep and diverse background in mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, computer science, and patent law, Run8 brings an holistic yet detail-oriented approach to patent prosecution, and to developing high-value, highly-effective patent portfolios for technology startups in the hardware, software, web platform, medical device, cleantech, IoT, manufacturing, and robotics spaces. - See more at: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/run8-patent-group#sthash.8oxLvPmq.dpuf

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/run8-patent-group.jpeg
Run8 Patent Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Run8 Patent Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Run8 Patent Group in 2026.

Incident History — Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Run8 Patent Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Run8 Patent Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/run8-patent-group.jpeg
Run8 Patent Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Run8 Patent Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Run8 Patent Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC company.

In the current year, Run8 Patent Group company and Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Run8 Patent Group company nor Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Run8 Patent Group company nor Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Run8 Patent Group company nor Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC company nor Run8 Patent Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC nor Run8 Patent Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC company nor Run8 Patent Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC company employs more people globally than Run8 Patent Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC nor Run8 Patent Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC nor Run8 Patent Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC nor Run8 Patent Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC nor Run8 Patent Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC nor Run8 Patent Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, PSC nor Run8 Patent Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.