Comparison Overview

Lennar

VS

Savills

Lennar

5505 Waterford District Dr, Miami, Florida, US, 33126
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lennar.com

Lennar Corporation, founded in 1954, is one of the nation's leading builders of quality homes for all generations. Lennar builds affordable, move-up and active adult homes primarily under the Lennar brand name. Lennar's Financial Services segment provides mortgage financing, title and closing services primarily for buyers of Lennar's homes and, through LMF Commercial, originates mortgage loans secured primarily by commercial real estate properties throughout the United States. Lennar's Multifamily segment is a nationwide developer of high-quality multifamily rental properties. LENX drives Lennar's technology, innovation and strategic investments. For more information about Lennar, please visit www.lennar.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9,548
Subsidiaries: 128
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Savills

33 Margaret Street, London, GB, W1G 0JD
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.savills.com

Savills is a global real estate advisor helping people thrive through places and spaces. With over 42,000 professionals in more than 700 offices across the Americas, Europe, Asia Pacific, Africa and the Middle East, we combine local knowledge with global insight to deliver tailored solutions that drive real impact. Headquartered in London and listed on the FTSE 250 (LON: SVS), we work with corporate, institutional and private clients to unlock the full potential of residential and commercial property. Whether you're a corporate looking to expand, an investor seeking to sustainably optimise your portfolio or a family trying to find a new home, we bring a truly personal approach to every project, delivering best-in-class insights and advice to help you make better property decisions.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13,748
Subsidiaries: 32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lennar.jpeg
Lennar
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/savills.jpeg
Savills
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lennar
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Savills
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lennar in 2026.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Savills in 2026.

Incident History — Lennar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lennar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Savills (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Savills cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lennar.jpeg
Lennar
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/savills.jpeg
Savills
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lennar company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Savills company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Lennar company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Savills company has not reported any.

In the current year, Savills company and Lennar company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Savills company nor Lennar company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Savills company nor Lennar company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Lennar company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Savills company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lennar company nor Savills company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lennar nor Savills holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lennar company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Savills company.

Savills company employs more people globally than Lennar company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither Lennar nor Savills holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lennar nor Savills holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lennar nor Savills holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lennar nor Savills holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lennar nor Savills holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lennar nor Savills holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References