Comparison Overview

Lam Research

VS

Intel Corporation

Lam Research

4650 Cushing Parkway, Fremont, 94538, US
Last Update: 2026-04-02
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.lamresearch.com

Lam Research Corp. (NASDAQ:LRCX) At Lam Research, we create equipment that drives technological advancements in the semiconductor industry. Our innovative solutions enable chipmakers to power progress in nearly all aspects of modern life, and it takes each member of our team to make it possible. Across our organization, our employees come to work and change the world. We take on the toughest challenges with precision and accuracy. We push for the next big semiconductor breakthrough. We lead the way in one of the most critical and fast-moving industries on the planet. And we do it together, with deep connections and limitless collaboration. The impact we have on the world is made possible by focusing on our people. We recognize and celebrate our teams’ achievements. We strive to create an inclusive and diverse culture where everyone’s contribution and voice has value. We evaluate and evolve our offerings, so our people receive the support and empowerment to do meaningful things for their lives, careers, and communities. Because at Lam, we believe that when people are the priority and they’re inspired to unleash the power of innovation for a better world together, anything is possible. Ready to help define the future of technology? Join us: www.lamresearch.com/careers

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 16,393
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Intel Corporation

Robert Noyce Building, Santa Clara, 95052, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799
http://www.intel.com

Our mission is to shape the future of technology to help create a better future for the entire world, that’s the power of Intel Inside. With more ingenuity and creativity inside, our work is at the heart of countless innovations. From major breakthroughs to things that make everyday life better— they’re all powered by Intel technology. With a career at Intel, you can help make the future more wonderful for everyone. • Need help or have a support question? Visit Intel Support: http://ms.spr.ly/6054tmaop

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 110,351
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lam-research.jpeg
Lam Research
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intel-corporation.jpeg
Intel Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lam Research
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Intel Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lam Research in 2026.

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intel Corporation in 2026.

Incident History — Lam Research (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lam Research cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Intel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lam-research.jpeg
Lam Research
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intel-corporation.jpeg
Intel Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Hardware-based memory manipulation
Motivation: Security Research / Proof of Concept
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Local Privilege Escalation, Cross-Tenant Data Theft in Cloud Environments, Memory Cache Exploitation
Motivation: Data Theft, Espionage, Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Information
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Authentication Bypass, Hardcoded Credentials, Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR)
Motivation: Research/Disclosure (Ethical)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Lam Research company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Intel Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Intel Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lam Research company has not reported any.

In the current year, Intel Corporation company and Lam Research company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Intel Corporation company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Lam Research company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Intel Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Lam Research company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Intel Corporation company nor Lam Research company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Intel Corporation company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Lam Research company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lam Research nor Intel Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Intel Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lam Research company.

Intel Corporation company employs more people globally than Lam Research company, reflecting its scale as a Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Neither Lam Research nor Intel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lam Research nor Intel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lam Research nor Intel Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lam Research nor Intel Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lam Research nor Intel Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lam Research nor Intel Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References