Comparison Overview

Kmart

VS

GPA

Kmart

33 W Monroe Street, Chicago, 60603, US
Last Update: 2026-03-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kmart.com

Life is ridiculously awesome. That’s a bold statement. But hey, bold statements are our thing. So here’s another one: Kmart is ridiculously awesome, too. Know why? Because we work at it. We don’t do anything halfway. We go out and crush it. We’re about more than the products we sell. And more than creating a great experience in-store and online. We’re about giving our all, making every day as ridiculously awesome as we believe it can be, and having a great time doing it.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 19,339
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
View Profile

GPA

Avenida Brigadeiro Luís Antônio 3172, São Paulo, 01402000, BR
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 800 and 849
http://www.gpabr.com

We are one of the largest food retail companies in Brazil. We were pioneers with a multi-format and multi-channel business model that brings together renowned chains and brands such as Pão de Açúcar and Extra, Minuto Pão de Açúcar, Pão de Açúcar Fresh and Mini Extra. In addition to our own and exclusive brands Qualitá, Taeq and Club des Sommeliers. We have more than 765 physical stores and are leaders in food e-commerce in Brazil, working tirelessly to be the best choice for our customers and the pride of our team. We are driven by a passion to serve and win. Our people are committed to our values to offer the best shopping experience in our stores. In all areas, regardless of role or position, everyone is focused on serving and delighting our customers every day.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 25,350
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kmart.jpeg
Kmart
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gpabr.jpeg
GPA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kmart
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GPA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kmart in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GPA in 2026.

Incident History — Kmart (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kmart cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kmart.jpeg
Kmart
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unsecured Database
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malicious Script
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2015
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gpabr.jpeg
GPA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GPA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kmart company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Kmart company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GPA company has not reported any.

In the current year, Kmart company has reported more cyber incidents than GPA company.

Neither GPA company nor Kmart company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Kmart company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other GPA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Kmart company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while GPA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Kmart company nor GPA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kmart nor GPA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GPA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kmart company.

GPA company employs more people globally than Kmart company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Kmart nor GPA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kmart nor GPA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kmart nor GPA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kmart nor GPA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kmart nor GPA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kmart nor GPA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References