Comparison Overview

Kenvue

VS

Natura

Kenvue

Summit, New Jersey, US, 07901
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.kenvue.com

Kenvue is the world’s largest pure-play consumer health company by revenue. Built on more than a century of heritage and propelled forward by science, our iconic brands — including Aveeno®, BAND-AID® Brand Adhesive Bandages, Johnson’s®, Listerine®, Neutrogena®, Tylenol® and Zyrtec® — are recommended by health care professionals and can be trusted by consumers who use our products to improve their daily lives. Our team members share a digital-first mindset, with an approach to innovation grounded in deep human insights and work every day to earn a place for our products in consumers’ hearts and homes. At Kenvue, we believe everyday care can not only make people well; it can make them whole. Beware of recruitment scams: https://www.kenvue.com/media/recruitment-scams-alert

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 19,168
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Natura

Av. Alexandre Colares, 1.188, Vila Jaguara, São Paulo, São Paulo, BR, 05106-0000
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 800 and 849
http://www.natura.com.br

Founded in 1969, Natura is a Brazilian multinational in the cosmetics and personal care segment, a leader in direct sales in Brazil, and recognized for protecting the Amazon social biodiversity through its sustainable business model. Cruelty free. 100% vegan. With 7,000 employees and 2 million beauty Consultants worldwide, Natura operates in 11 countries. In 2014, Natura became the first publicly traded company to receive B Corp ™ certification, and its third certification was concluded in 2020. Natura’s Ekos line is certified by the Union for Ethical Biotrade (UEBT). Learn more: natura.com

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 47,474
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kenvue.jpeg
Kenvue
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natura.jpeg
Natura
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kenvue
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Natura
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kenvue in 2026.

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natura in 2026.

Incident History — Kenvue (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kenvue cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Natura (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natura cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kenvue.jpeg
Kenvue
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natura.jpeg
Natura
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Natura company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kenvue company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Natura company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kenvue company.

In the current year, Natura company and Kenvue company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Natura company nor Kenvue company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Natura company nor Kenvue company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Natura company nor Kenvue company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kenvue company nor Natura company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kenvue company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Natura company.

Natura company employs more people globally than Kenvue company, reflecting its scale as a Personal Care Product Manufacturing.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References