Comparison Overview

Keller Williams Colombia

VS

Greystar

Keller Williams Colombia

Cra 14 85 68, Bogota, 000001, CO
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kwcolombia.com

Hemos creado este canal de comunicación con el fin de llevar los sistemas, modelos y valores de nuestra empresa para empezar a cambiar vidas. Colombia carece de un sistema formal de hacer negocios de bienes raíces, por eso, nuestro objetivo es ayudar a crear un ambiente de profesionalismo, basados en una plataforma de formación sin igual y con el apoyo de las herramientas tecnológicas y de marketing. ¡Bienvenidos al negocio de cambiar vidas!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Greystar

465 Meeting St, Suite 500, Charleston, South Carolina, US, 29403
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 700 and 749
https://www.greystar.com

Founded in 1993, Greystar provides world-class service in the residential rental housing industry. Our innovative vertically integrated business model integrates the management, development and investment disciplines of the rental housing industry on international, regional and local levels. This unique approach and our commitment to hiring the best professionals have resulted in record growth, making us one of the most respected and trusted global real estate companies. Because our vertically integrated business model includes both investment and service-oriented businesses, we’re able to maintain a constant presence in local markets and create value in all phases of the real estate cycle. Our international platform provides economies of scale, financial sophistication, institutional quality reporting and tremendous capital relationships, while our city offices provide local market expertise and execution. Supported by a global team of 28,000+ employees, Greystar’s experienced and cross-functional executive team boasts on average over 23 years of industry experience and provides a diverse perspective throughout the investment process. Over the years, Greystar has learned what’s important to people when it comes to a place to call home. That’s why we continually strive to provide beautiful living environments and innovative services that enhance the living experience. We take great pride in knowing that our homes are inviting places for residents to celebrate life’s important moments. Privacy Policy: https://www.greystar.com/privacy DMCA: https://www.greystar.com/terms-of-use#Copyright%20Infringement%20Policy

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18,572
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keller-williams-colombia.jpeg
Keller Williams Colombia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greystar.jpeg
Greystar
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Keller Williams Colombia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Greystar
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keller Williams Colombia in 2026.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greystar in 2026.

Incident History — Keller Williams Colombia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keller Williams Colombia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Greystar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greystar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keller-williams-colombia.jpeg
Keller Williams Colombia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greystar.jpeg
Greystar
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Keller Williams Colombia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Greystar company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Greystar company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Keller Williams Colombia company has not reported any.

In the current year, Greystar company and Keller Williams Colombia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Greystar company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Keller Williams Colombia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Greystar company nor Keller Williams Colombia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Greystar company nor Keller Williams Colombia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Keller Williams Colombia company nor Greystar company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Keller Williams Colombia nor Greystar holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Keller Williams Colombia company nor Greystar company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Greystar company employs more people globally than Keller Williams Colombia company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither Keller Williams Colombia nor Greystar holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Keller Williams Colombia nor Greystar holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Keller Williams Colombia nor Greystar holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Keller Williams Colombia nor Greystar holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Keller Williams Colombia nor Greystar holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Keller Williams Colombia nor Greystar holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References