JYP Entertainment Company Cyber Security Posture
jype.comโLeader In Entertainmentโ This is the value and goal that JYP Entertainment constantly pursues. Based on this motto, JYP Entertainment strives to become the leading company that brings change to the entertainment industry. Led by Asia's best producer Jin Young Park, the company has produced many global artists, including god, Rain, Wonder Girls, 2PM, 2AM, miss A, GOT7, TWICE, Stray Kids, ITZY, Xdinary Heroes, and NMIXX in Korea; NiziU in Japan; BOY STORY, and YAOCHEN in China. In the business area, the company has expanded K-pop's influence by communicating with the worldwide music industry through the company's oversea subsidiaries JYP USA, JYP JAPAN, and JYP CHINA. Additionally, the company founded JYP Three Sixty to expand the IP business to the platform business. The company also invests in discovering and raising creative, proactive talents and lives up to the core values of being a 'Leading Company' and 'Respected Company' as the 'Leader in Entertainment.' JYP Entertainment abides by the law, morality, and social norms by managing the business transparently. As the industry leader, the company will continue to carry out duties and responsibilities as a trustworthy member of society.
JYP Entertainment Company Details
jypentertainment
1079 employees
4045039227
none
์ํฐํ ์ธ๋จผํธ
jype.com
Scan still pending
JYP_2242483
In-progress
JYP Entertainment Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 200 and 800
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
JYP Entertainment Global Score.png)
JYP Entertainment Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 200 and 800 |
JYP Entertainment Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JYP Entertainment | Cyber Attack | 80 | 2 | 01/2016 | JYP18568522 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: The home page pf the website of JYP Entertainment, which represents singer Chou Tzu-yu (ๅจๅญ็), swas taken down as the result of an apparent cyberattack back in 2016. The attack was initiated after the company was accused of coercing Chou into recording an online video apology after footage of her waving a Republic of China flag triggered an angry reaction in China | |||||||
JYP Entertainment Company Subsidiaries
โLeader In Entertainmentโ This is the value and goal that JYP Entertainment constantly pursues. Based on this motto, JYP Entertainment strives to become the leading company that brings change to the entertainment industry. Led by Asia's best producer Jin Young Park, the company has produced many global artists, including god, Rain, Wonder Girls, 2PM, 2AM, miss A, GOT7, TWICE, Stray Kids, ITZY, Xdinary Heroes, and NMIXX in Korea; NiziU in Japan; BOY STORY, and YAOCHEN in China. In the business area, the company has expanded K-pop's influence by communicating with the worldwide music industry through the company's oversea subsidiaries JYP USA, JYP JAPAN, and JYP CHINA. Additionally, the company founded JYP Three Sixty to expand the IP business to the platform business. The company also invests in discovering and raising creative, proactive talents and lives up to the core values of being a 'Leading Company' and 'Respected Company' as the 'Leader in Entertainment.' JYP Entertainment abides by the law, morality, and social norms by managing the business transparently. As the industry leader, the company will continue to carry out duties and responsibilities as a trustworthy member of society.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
JYP Entertainment Cyber Security News
How TikTok is fighting deepfakes of K-pop idols
In the case of sexually exploitative deepfakes of K-pop idols, TikTok reiterated that such content is regarded as a severe violation of safetyย ...
'Romance bots, deepfake digital twins, malvertising' seen as rising cybersecurity concerns
AI-powered chatbots are now being used to lure people into fake romantic relationships meant to scam money, a leading global cybersecurity firm said.
K-pop agency YG joins industry battle vs deepfake content
YG Entertainment, the agency behind Blackpink, has said it was pursuing legal action against inappropriate deepfake content depicting its artists.
TWICEโs label threatens โthe strongest legal actionโ against deepfake videos of the group
JYP Entertainment to pursue strong legal action against any creators of deepfake videos depicting members of TWICE and any of its artists.
JYP Entertainment vows 'strongest legal action' vs deepfake videos
A major K-pop agency has vowed to take the "strongest legal action" against deepfake videos depicting its artists.
Girl group Twice pulled a sword for the "deepfake" crime.On the 30th, TWICE's agency JYP Entertainme..
Girl group Twice pulled a sword for the "deepfake" crime. On the 30th, TWICE's agency JYP Entertainment said on its official SNS, "It isย ...
JYP warns legal action vs deepfake videos of TWICE
JYP Entertainment announced its plans to pursue legal action against those behind deepfake (AI-generated) videos of its girl group TWICE.
K-pop agencies declare war on deepfake porn using artists' faces
K-pop agencies declare war on deepfake porn using artists' faces ยท Government plans to penalize production, possession of deepfake contentย ...
K-pop singers are complaining about the spread of "deepfake" sex crimes that synthesize photos of ot..
K-pop singers are complaining about the spread of "deepfake" sex crimes that synthesize photos of other people's faces with pornography.
JYP Entertainment Similar Companies
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
JYP Entertainment CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, JYP Entertainment has faced 1 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as โLeader In Entertainmentโ This is the value and goal that JYP Entertainment constantly pursues. Based on this motto, JYP Entertainment strives to become the leading company that brings change to the entertainment industry. Led by Asia's best producer Jin Young Park, the company has produced many global artists, including god, Rain, Wonder Girls, 2PM, 2AM, miss A, GOT7, TWICE, Stray Kids, ITZY, Xdinary Heroes, and NMIXX in Korea; NiziU in Japan; BOY STORY, and YAOCHEN in China. In the business area, the company has expanded K-pop's influence by communicating with the worldwide music industry through the company's oversea subsidiaries JYP USA, JYP JAPAN, and JYP CHINA. Additionally, the company founded JYP Three Sixty to expand the IP business to the platform business. The company also invests in discovering and raising creative, proactive talents and lives up to the core values of being a 'Leading Company' and 'Respected Company' as the 'Leader in Entertainment.' JYP Entertainment abides by the law, morality, and social norms by managing the business transparently. As the industry leader, the company will continue to carry out duties and responsibilities as a trustworthy member of society..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
