Jobs Company Cyber Security Posture

adlermedrado.com.br

Website for who is looking for job and for who is looking for new talents.

Jobs Company Details

Linkedin ID:

jobs

Employees number:

1 employee

Number of followers:

0

NAICS:

541

Industry Type:

Human Resources Services

Homepage:

adlermedrado.com.br

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

JOB_5267282

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreJobs Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

Ailogo

Jobs Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

Jobs Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
11
Attack Types
3
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView
M.A.D MobileBreach8543/2025JOB458033125Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Over 1.5 million private and explicit images from users of five dating apps developed by M.A.D Mobile were left exposed due to unprotected cloud storage buckets. The affected apps included BDSM People, Chica, Pink, Brish, and Translove, endangering the privacy and security of up to 900,000 users. Despite being alerted, the developer failed to secure the servers for months, risking user blackmail and extortion, especially in countries with anti-LGBT sentiments. The severity of this breach is high given the sensitive nature of the exposed data and the potential consequences for the individuals involved.

WK Kellogg Co.Breach10034/2025JOB827040825Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: WK Kellogg Co. experienced a data breach due to a ransomware attack by the group CL0P, which exploited vulnerabilities in their third-party vendor Cleo's software. The data exposed included sensitive employee information such as names and Social Security numbers. CL0P's attack led to a significant data leak, threatening the privacy of employees and putting the company at risk of financial and reputational damage. WK Kellogg Co. has filed a data breach notice, notified affected individuals, and is offering identity theft protection services.

WK KelloggBreach8534/2025JOB948040825Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: WK Kellogg, an American food manufacturing giant, faced a cyber attack through the Cleo file transfer tool, resulting in the theft of employee information. The incident marks a significant data breach, undermining the privacy and integrity of employee personal details. Due to the nature of the stolen information, the attack has the potential to carry long-term repercussions for the affected employees, including identity theft and fraud. This breach not only inflicts financial harm on the individuals but also damages the company's reputation and raises concerns about cybersecurity measures within corporate environments.

WK Kellogg CoRansomware8534/2025JOB738040725Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: WK Kellogg Co, an American food manufacturing giant, reported a data breach involving unauthorized access to employee files during the widespread Cleo data theft attacks by the Clop ransomware gang. The incident, linked to zero-day flaws CVE-2024-50623 and CVE-2024-55956, led to the theft of personal data, including names and social security numbers. The company has taken measures to prevent future incidents by working with Cleo and offers affected individuals identity monitoring and fraud protection services.

SensataRansomware10054/2025JOB527041125Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: Sensata, a prominent US sensor manufacturer, encountered a disruptive ransomware attack that resulted in the encryption of certain devices within its network. This incident hindered various operational facets, including manufacturing, shipping, and receiving, alongside support functions. The breach led to the loss of sensitive files, the specifics of which have not been disclosed. Sensata has initiated an investigation into the breach and is currently in the process of discerning the full extent of the attack, as well as the implications on its financial outcomes for the upcoming quarter, yet the potential for significant material impact has not been ruled out.

Toll GroupRansomware10045/2025JOB001050225Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: In 2020, global logistics provider Toll Group was targeted by the Nefilim ransomware operation, resulting in a complete network breach. Attackers gained unauthorized access to corporate systems, exfiltrated sensitive operational and financial data, and deployed AES-128 encryption across critical servers and workstations, appending the ".NEFILIM" extension to affected files. The disruption forced Toll Group to halt certain shipping and freight operations temporarily, incurring significant revenue losses and logistical delays. Stolen data included client manifests, internal financial reports, and employee records, which the attackers threatened to publish on dark-web leak sites unless a bitcoin ransom was paid. Although Toll Group engaged cybersecurity experts to isolate infected segments, restore backups, and negotiate with the threat actors, remediation costsโ€”including incident response, system recovery, legal fees, and potential regulatory finesโ€”exceeded tens of millions of dollars. The breach also damaged the companyโ€™s reputation, prompting customers to seek alternative logistics partners amid concerns over data confidentiality and service resilience.

SentinelOneRansomware10055/2025JOB000050625Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: During a recent engagement, threat actors exploited a flaw in SentinelOneโ€™s agent upgrade process to disable endpoint protection and deploy the Babuk ransomware. By running the legitimate SentinelOne installer and then forcefully terminating its msiexec.exe process after it stopped the EDR servicesโ€”but before it installed the new versionโ€”attackers left devices entirely unprotected. Once the EDR agent was offline, the adversaries gained free rein to execute their ransomware payload, encrypting critical systems and data without detection. The breach resulted in widespread operational disruption, substantial remediation costs, potential data loss, and significant downtime as affected devices had to be restored from backups or rebuilt. The incident also exposed gaps in default security configurations, prompting urgent customer communications and rapid policy updates. Although SentinelOne issued mitigations and informed other major EDR vendors, impacted organizations still faced ransom negotiations, legal and regulatory scrutiny, and damage to customer trust and corporate reputation. The event underscores the critical importance of enabling Online Authorization for local agent upgrades to prevent similar bypasses and ensure the integrity of endpoint defenses.

VeeamVulnerability10033/2025JOB443032025Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: A critical vulnerability, CVE-2025-23120, with a CVSS score of 9.9, was identified in Veeam Backup & Replication systems, potentially compromising the backup infrastructure of organizations globally. Authenticated domain users could perform remote code execution, posing significant risks to enterprise environments. This vulnerability particularly favors ransomware operators who could manipulate recovery operations during attacks. Despite best practices advising against it, domain-joined backup servers are common, increasing the potential for exploitation. Over 20% of incident responses in 2024 involved attackers leveraging Veeam after establishing initial access within networks, emphasizing the system's attractiveness to cybercriminals. To mitigate the risk, Veeam released a critical security update, urging immediate application to prevent potential devastating impacts on business continuity and data integrity.

NISTVulnerability10053/2025JOB353032525Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: In March 2025, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) confronts a deepening crisis with a growing backlog of unprocessed Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), crucial for national cybersecurity. Despite consistent processing rates, a 32 percent increase in CVE submissions in 2024 has overwhelmed capabilities, leading to projections of over 30,000 unanalyzed vulnerabilities by early 2025. This backlog jeopardizes organizations depending on NVD for timely vulnerability management, as it hinders access to vital data for threat prioritization. The situation is exacerbated by discontinued funding support from CISA and inadequate measures to counter the submission surge, putting immense pressure on NIST to revolutionize their processing methods to curtail escalating risks to the cybersecurity infrastructure.

NVIDIAVulnerability10054/2025JOB741042525Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: The vulnerabilities within the NVIDIA NeMo Framework allow remote code execution through flaws in deserialization, path validation, and code generation controls. Attackers can exploit these issues to inject malicious code, overwrite critical files, or hijack AI training pipelines, undermining model integrity. Data tampering might corrupt sensitive datasets, introduce backdoors, or degrade AI performance, leading to erroneous outputs. Organizations relying on NeMo for large language models, multimodal deep learning, and speech recognition could face prolonged downtime while investigating breaches, retraining models, and restoring clean datasets. Business-critical applications such as customer support chatbots, autonomous systems, and internal analytics tools risk operational failures, resulting in revenue loss, regulatory scrutiny, and reputational damage. The broad cross-platform exposure on Windows, Linux, and macOS further amplifies the threat surface. Despite immediate patches in version 25.02, any delayed update adoption leaves systems vulnerable to advanced persistent threats. Long-term consequences include erosion of stakeholder trust, increased defense expenditures, and potential legal liabilities if corrupted or poisoned models influence downstream applications. The intertwined nature of AI workflows means a single exploit can cascade across multiple projects, imperiling fundamental research and enterprise deployments.

NVIDIAVulnerability6035/2025JOB301050225Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: NVIDIA disclosed and patched a high-severity vulnerability (CVE-2025-23254) in its TensorRT-LLM framework that could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code, tamper with data and compromise AI workloads. The flaw resides in the Python executorโ€™s insecure use of pickle serialization for inter-process communication. An adversary with access to the TRTLLM server socket can craft a malicious pickle payload to invoke arbitrary functions during deserialization, leading to code execution, information disclosure and data corruption. Exploitation may expose sensitive model parameters, customer inputs, proprietary algorithms and internal configuration files, damaging the integrity of machine learning pipelines and undermining trust in downstream AI services. Although no public exploit has been observed, the CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 underscores the severity of potential impact. NVIDIAโ€™s patch in version 0.18.2 adds HMAC-based encryption for IPC channels to validate message integrity and prevent unauthorized deserialization. Organizations using TensorRT-LLM are urged to upgrade immediately to guard against supply-chain disruptions, loss of intellectual property and inadvertent leakage of employee or customer data. Failure to apply the fix could result in undetected unauthorized code execution within critical AI infrastructure, leading to compliance violations and operational downtime.

Jobs Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Website for who is looking for job and for who is looking for new talents.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=jobs' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

Jobs Cyber Security News

2025-06-03T04:00:21.000Z
Cybersecurity jobs available right now: June 3, 2025

Here are the worldwide cybersecurity job openings available as of June 3, 2025, including on-site, hybrid, and remote roles.

2025-06-03T11:02:16.000Z
Working for ICE

ICE has specific hiring programs for veterans, people with disabilities, students, recent graduates and other applicants to take on challengingย ...

2025-06-02T15:46:57.000Z
Trump budget proposal would slash more than 1,000 CISA jobs

The fate of the fiscal 2026 budget blueprint, which includes a $495 million reduction for the agency, is uncertain. By Tim Starks.

2025-06-02T17:11:14.000Z
Inspiring the Next Generation of Cybersecurity Professionals: Maryvilleโ€™s CyberSpark Event Breaks Attendance Records

Maryville University held two workshops for aspiring cybersecurity professionals to help prepare them for cybersecurity careers.

2025-06-02T11:04:13.000Z
ANGOKA chair says cyber security technology could create 'hundreds of jobs'

A Belfast-based cyber security firm is investing almost ยฃ2m in software to help prevent the advanced manufacturing sector from cyber attacksย ...

2025-05-07T07:00:00.000Z
CrowdStrike to cut 500 jobs in plan to scale business

CrowdStrike said Wednesday that it would cut 500 jobs, or 5% of its global workforce, as part of a plan to scale its business and meet a goal ofย ...

2025-06-02T14:00:00.000Z
CyberSeek expands cybersecurity workforce data coverage and enhances user experience

None

2025-05-30T15:07:14.000Z
Cybersecurity Competitions & Games

Cybersecurity competitions and games are a fun and interactive way to allow students and prospective/current cybersecurity professionals toย ...

2025-06-02T09:30:00.000Z
North Korean Spies Want Your Jobs. Hereโ€™s What You Can Do.

North Korean workers are securing jobs at some of the largest American companies by masquerading as others and earning good money in theย ...

similarCompanies

Jobs Similar Companies

Paychex

As the future of work continues to evolve, Paychex leads the way by making complex HR, payroll, and benefits brilliantly simple. Our unique combination of digital HR technology and advisory solutions meets the changing needs of employers and their employees. You can see the results in our growth as

Randstad Portugal

A Randstad รฉ a empresa nรบmero 1 no sector de Recursos Humanos a nรญvel mundial e lรญder em Portugal onde: - conta com 450 colaboradores internos; - coloca cerca de 30 mil pessoas a trabalhar diariamente; - presenรงa nacional atravรฉs de delegaรงรตes, contact centres e localizaรงรตes Inhouse.

Welcome to LHH! We're a global leader in HR solutions that future-proofs organizations and careers worldwide. Our Advisory, Career Transition & Mobility, Leadership Development, and Recruitment Solutions enable transformation, and our job is never done because thereโ€™s always another tomorrow to pre

Alight Solutions

Alight is a leading cloud-based human capital technology and services provider for many of the worldโ€™s largest organizations. Through the administration of employee benefits, Alight powers confident health, wealth, leaves and wellbeing decisions for 35 million people and dependents. Our Alight Workl

The Adecco Group

We believe in people and their place in the world of work. Everything we do as a company reflects our desire to continually evolve the concept of work for today and tomorrow. We pride ourselves on our ability to deliver a wide range of multi-disciplinary solutions across all sectors and areas of emp

Valid People

Valid heeft een ambitie. De Valid Group is het platform van waaruit mensen met een lastig lichaam een baan kunnen vinden. Van waaruit werkgevers maatschappelijk verantwoord kunnen ondernemen. En van waaruit de overheid maatschappelijke kosten kan verlagen. Maar Valid is meer, Valid heeft een

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

Jobs CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Jobs has faced 11 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Ransomware', 'Breach', 'Vulnerability'].

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Website for who is looking for job and for who is looking for new talents..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Breach', 'Ransomware', 'Vulnerability'].

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge