Comparison Overview

Jindal Steel Ltd.

VS

Sandvik

Jindal Steel Ltd.

Jindal Centre, 12, Bhikaiji Cama Place, Delhi, New Delhi, IN, 110066
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.jindalsteel.in

Jindal Steel is one of India’s foremost integrated steel producers, renowned for its scale, efficiency, and commitment to excellence. Operating on a robust mine-to-metal model, the Company leverages captive resources, advanced manufacturing capabilities, and a global distribution network to deliver high-performance steel solutions. With an investment footprint exceeding USD 12 billion, Jindal Steel runs state-of-the-art facilities in Angul, Raigarh, and Patratu, and maintains strategic operations across India and Africa. Its diversified and future-ready product portfolio underpins core sectors such as infrastructure, construction, and manufacturing, powering progress through strength and sustainability. Take the next step in your career with Jindal Steel by submitting your application to our Talent Acquisition team at "[email protected]"

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 19,633
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sandvik

Kungsbron 1, Stockholm, 111 22, SE
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
http://home.sandvik

Sandvik is a global, high-tech engineering group providing solutions that enhance productivity, profitability and sustainability for the manufacturing, mining and infrastructure industries. We are at the forefront of digitalization and focus on optimizing our customers’ processes. Our world-leading offering includes equipment, tools, services and digital solutions for machining, mining, rock excavation and rock processing. In 2024, the Sandvik Group had approximately 41,000 employees, sales in more than 150 countries and revenues of about SEK 123 billion.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 33,567
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jindalsteel-ltd..jpeg
Jindal Steel Ltd.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandvik.jpeg
Sandvik
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jindal Steel Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sandvik
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jindal Steel Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sandvik in 2026.

Incident History — Jindal Steel Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jindal Steel Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sandvik (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sandvik cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jindalsteel-ltd..jpeg
Jindal Steel Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandvik.jpeg
Sandvik
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sandvik company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jindal Steel Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sandvik company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jindal Steel Ltd. company.

In the current year, Sandvik company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sandvik company nor Jindal Steel Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sandvik company nor Jindal Steel Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sandvik company nor Jindal Steel Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. company nor Sandvik company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Sandvik holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sandvik company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jindal Steel Ltd. company.

Sandvik company employs more people globally than Jindal Steel Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Mining.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Sandvik holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Sandvik holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Sandvik holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Sandvik holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Sandvik holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Sandvik holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References