Comparison Overview

Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc.

VS

Lamkin Corporation

Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc.

8800 South Clare Ave., Clare, Michigan 48617, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04

Jay’s Sporting Goods is an online and brick ‘n mortar Outdoor Superstore. With two locations in Michigan it is quite frequently a must stop destination for anyone traveling throughout Michigan. Started in 1971 by Jay and Arlene Poet in a one car garage it has grown into a 78,000 square ft building in Clare and the 40,000 square ft building in Gaylord, MI. With a focus on the outdoor industry Jay’s supplies your needs in multiple product categories such as Archery, Firearms, Fishing, Camping, and Clothing apparel to help you with your next adventure. With a family like atmosphere and a Faith based focus we have been in busines for over 50+ years.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lamkin Corporation

6530 Gateway Park Drive, San Diego, 92154, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799

Lamkin Corporation, a privately-owned company headquartered in San Diego, is the original manufacturer of premium golf club grips. The company was established in 1925 and initially provided top golf club maker's with leather grips. Over the last 90 years, Lamkin has evolved into the world's leading producer of high-performance golf grips. The most esteemed brands in golf trust Lamkin grips on their premium clubs, along with top Tour players, thousands of PGA professionals and millions of worldwide golfers. Lamkin Grips is dedicated to connecting golfers to a more confident, consistent and enjoyable game.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 126
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jay's-sporting-goods---gaylord.jpeg
Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lamkin-corporation.jpeg
Lamkin Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lamkin Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lamkin Corporation in 2026.

Incident History — Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lamkin Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lamkin Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jay's-sporting-goods---gaylord.jpeg
Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lamkin-corporation.jpeg
Lamkin Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. company and Lamkin Corporation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Lamkin Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. company.

In the current year, Lamkin Corporation company and Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lamkin Corporation company nor Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lamkin Corporation company nor Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lamkin Corporation company nor Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. company nor Lamkin Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. nor Lamkin Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. company nor Lamkin Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lamkin Corporation company employs more people globally than Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. nor Lamkin Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. nor Lamkin Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. nor Lamkin Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. nor Lamkin Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. nor Lamkin Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc. nor Lamkin Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda 4G03 Pro up to 1.0/1.1/04.03.01.53/192.168.0.1. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /bin/httpd. The manipulation results in improper access controls. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Wikipedia 12.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to crash the application by submitting oversized input through the search functionality. Attackers can paste a large buffer of repeated characters into the search bar to trigger an application crash.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Nodcms contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized administrative actions by crafting malicious forms. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into submitting requests to admin/user_manipulate and admin/settings/generall endpoints to create users or modify application settings without explicit consent.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

10-Strike LANState 8.8 contains a local buffer overflow vulnerability in structured exception handling that allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code by crafting malicious LSM map files. Attackers can create a specially formatted LSM file with a payload in the ObjCaption parameter that overflows the buffer, overwrites the SEH chain, and executes shellcode when the file is opened in the application.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NICO-FTP 3.0.1.19 contains a structured exception handler buffer overflow vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending crafted FTP commands. Attackers can connect to the FTP service and send oversized data in response handlers to overwrite SEH pointers and redirect execution to injected shellcode.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X