JLR Company Cyber Security Posture
jaguarlandrovercareers.comEvery vehicle. Every innovation. Every bit of momentum in over 170 markets worldwide. None of it would be possible without the expertise, drive and continued ambition of our people. We’re proud of our heritage, but it’s our vision for the future that excites us most. Right across our business, everybody plays a crucial role in the ever-evolving JLR journey. And with exciting new products, cutting-edge facilities and continued growth into new markets, there has never been a more exciting time to join us. We may be renowned for our iconic vehicles, but our drive for excellence covers more than premium design and world-class engineering. Ours is a truly global business, with the opportunities to match. You can learn more about our business areas and current opportunities here on the JLR Linked Company pages. This is also the place to ask any questions you may have, share your experiences and talk to the other talented individuals who are thinking about joining us. We look forward to talking with you.
JLR Company Details
jaguar-land-rover_1
38392 employees
1035442.0
336
Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
jaguarlandrovercareers.com
Scan still pending
JLR_3380531
In-progress
JLR Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
JLR Global Score.png)
JLR Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
JLR Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar Land Rover | Breach | 100 | 5 | 05/2018 | JAG19424722 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization's existenceDescription: A massive data leak has revealed the personnel files of hundreds of employees at Jaguar Land Rover's factory in Solihull, England. The documents reveal details such as sick days used, disciplinary issues, and most notably red lines indicating potential firings in the weeks or months ahead. The personal records of more than 600 workers were released. The main culprits include a huge slump in sales of diesel-powered vehicles, a vital part of JLR's business in the U.K. and throughout Europe along with fears about how the upcoming "Brexit" will affect business operations. | |||||||
| Tata Technologies | Ransomware | 85 | 3 | 2/2025 | TAT000020325 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: Tata Technologies, a subsidiary of Tata Motors, encountered a ransomware attack leading to the suspension of certain IT services as a precautionary measure. The incident targeted a segment of its IT infrastructure. While client delivery services remained unaffected, the extent of data breach, if any, was not disclosed. Notably, this follows a previous cyber incident in October 2022 where Tata Power faced a ransomware attack, with subsequent leakage of stolen information by Hive ransomware gang including sensitive employee and operational data. | |||||||
| Tata Technologies | Ransomware | 85 | 3 | 3/2025 | TAT702030425 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: The Hunters International ransomware gang targeted Tata Technologies in a January cyberattack, claiming to have stolen 1.4TB of data, disrupting IT systems but not affecting client delivery services. The impact on operations was reported as minimal, with no client data or critical service disruptions mentioned, but the breach included a threat to release the stolen files if no ransom was paid. | |||||||
| Tata Technologies | Ransomware | 100 | 4 | 4/2025 | TAT235040325 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: Tata Technologies, a global engineering and product development digital services company, was one of the victims of the Hunters International cybercriminal group. During their operations, before considering a move away from ransomware to purely data theft extortion schemes, Hunters International compromised and possibly extracted sensitive data from the company. The exact nature of the data stolen or the full consequences of the breach were not detailed, but given the profile of the company and the typical operational patterns of ransomware groups, the impact could be significant in terms of financial loss, intellectual property theft, and reputational damage. | |||||||
JLR Company Subsidiaries
Every vehicle. Every innovation. Every bit of momentum in over 170 markets worldwide. None of it would be possible without the expertise, drive and continued ambition of our people. We’re proud of our heritage, but it’s our vision for the future that excites us most. Right across our business, everybody plays a crucial role in the ever-evolving JLR journey. And with exciting new products, cutting-edge facilities and continued growth into new markets, there has never been a more exciting time to join us. We may be renowned for our iconic vehicles, but our drive for excellence covers more than premium design and world-class engineering. Ours is a truly global business, with the opportunities to match. You can learn more about our business areas and current opportunities here on the JLR Linked Company pages. This is also the place to ask any questions you may have, share your experiences and talk to the other talented individuals who are thinking about joining us. We look forward to talking with you.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
JLR Cyber Security News
Research and Innovation | JLR Corporate Website
Our research teams work closely with academic partners at leading global universities innovating together to bring the latest technology developments to our ...
Jaguar Land Rover Breach Highlights Growing Cybersecurity Risks in Automotive Sector
A major cyberattack on Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) has cast a spotlight on the persistent threat of ransomware targeting global corporations.
Jaguar Land Rover's source code leaked, hackers say
Jaguar Land Rover allegedly suffered a data breach exposing source code, leaking tracking data, and employee details.
Jaguar Land Rover Hit by HELLCAT Ransomware Using Stolen Jira Credentials
The HELLCAT ransomware group has claimed for a data breach at Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), exposing vast amounts of sensitive data.
Jaguar Land Rover Breached by HELLCAT Ransomware Group using Jira Credentials
Luxury automotive manufacturer Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) has become the latest victim of the rapidly emerging HELLCAT ransomware group.
Automotive Cyber Security, Connectivity & SDV Week 2025
Welcome to Cyber Security, Connectivity & SDV Week 2025. Find all you need to know about the latest agenda, key speakers and more.
Jaguar Land Rover hacked, 350 GB data leaked, report
Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) was reportedly hacked last week, with data including plans, source code and employee details stolen.
Threat actor claims 700 files leaked from Jaguar Land Rover
A threat actor has claimed to have leaked hundreds of files of confidential data from car manufacturer Jaguar Land Rover.
Jaguar Land Rover Allegedly Hacked – 700 Internal Documents Including Source Code Leaked
A threat actor known as "Rey" has come forward on a prominent dark web forum, claiming responsibility for a significant cyberattack on ...
JLR Similar Companies
Yazaki Corporation
Yazaki is a Japanese-based manufacturing company. It was founded in 1941 as an automotive company. "Yazaki produces and markets wire harnesses for cars, electric cables, and gas equipment, as well as air conditioning and solar-powered equipment in Japan, while wire harness manufacture consists of
Daimler Buses GmbH
Daimler Buses GmbH is Daimler Truck AG's largest European subsidiary. With our brands Mercedes-Benz, Setra, OMNIplus and BusStore, we are the leading full-line provider in the European bus market and have a global presence, as well. We have continued to develop and have positioned ourselves viably f
General Motors
General Motors’ vision is to create a world with Zero Crashes, Zero Emissions and Zero Congestion, and we have committed ourselves to leading the way toward this future. Today, we are in the midst of a transportation revolution, and we have the ambition, the talent and the technology to realize the
Honda Cars India Ltd
Honda Cars India Ltd. (HCIL), a leading manufacturer of premium cars in India, was established in December 1995 with a commitment to provide Honda’s passenger car models and technologies, to the Indian customers. HCIL’s corporate office is based in Greater Noida, UP and its state-of-the-art manufact
DENSO
DENSO is one of the world's largest automotive suppliers of technology and components found in almost all vehicles around the globe – Toyota, Honda, Stellantis, General Motors, Ford, Volvo, Mercedes-Benz, to name a few. Our 24,000+ North American team members collaborate to support a greener and saf
Automotive Manufacturers Private Limited
Automotive Manufacturers Private Limited (AMPL) was incorporated in the year 1948, under the dynamic leadership of Shri. Manubhai Sanghvi and Shri. P.P Sanghvi. The company started as main dealers of Leyland Motors, UK for marketing their products in the erstwhile states of Bombay, Hyderabad and
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
JLR CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, JLR has faced 4 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Breach', 'Ransomware'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Every vehicle. Every innovation. Every bit of momentum in over 170 markets worldwide. None of it would be possible without the expertise, drive and continued ambition of our people. We’re proud of our heritage, but it’s our vision for the future that excites us most. Right across our business, everybody plays a crucial role in the ever-evolving JLR journey. And with exciting new products, cutting-edge facilities and continued growth into new markets, there has never been a more exciting time to join us. We may be renowned for our iconic vehicles, but our drive for excellence covers more than premium design and world-class engineering. Ours is a truly global business, with the opportunities to match. You can learn more about our business areas and current opportunities here on the JLR Linked Company pages. This is also the place to ask any questions you may have, share your experiences and talk to the other talented individuals who are thinking about joining us. We look forward to talking with you..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Ransomware'].
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
