Comparison Overview

Inter County Judicial Services

VS

Blas de Lezo

Inter County Judicial Services

6851 Jericho Tpke, Syosset, 11791, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ijslegal.com

Process serving and paralegal services, including court filings, document retrieval and court order processing. Over 35 years experience. Owner & president Larry Yellon is also a Guest lecturer, Hofstra University Law School, President of The New York State Professional Process Servers Association, and First Vice President, National Association Professional Process Servers, co-chair state charter association committee, chair, reactive legislation sub committee.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Blas de Lezo

Avinguda dels Ports d'Europa, 100, Barcelona, Spain, ES, 08040
Last Update: 2026-03-30
Between 750 and 799
https://bdlezo.com

Blas de Lezo Abogados ofrece una solución adecuada a las necesidades de su negocio. Apuntamos a la excelencia de los servicios jurídicos desde una vertiente comercial, amoldando nuestros servicios a sus necesidades diarias y asesorándole a iniciativa propia para evitarle conflictos futuros. Nuestra especialidad dentro del derecho marítimo y del derecho y economía del medioambiente y la sostenibilidad se remonta a los inicios de la actividad de nuestro despacho. Desde entonces hemos visto multitud de cambios en la industria marítima y hemos compartido grandes experiencias con nuestros clientes. A día de hoy, continuamos con nuestro afán emprendedor de sugerirles nuevas formas de trabajo y gestión, haciéndonos cómplices de su propio desarrollo y éxito profesional.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 122
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intercounty-judicial-services.jpeg
Inter County Judicial Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blasdelezo.jpeg
Blas de Lezo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Inter County Judicial Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Blas de Lezo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inter County Judicial Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blas de Lezo in 2026.

Incident History — Inter County Judicial Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inter County Judicial Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Blas de Lezo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blas de Lezo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intercounty-judicial-services.jpeg
Inter County Judicial Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blasdelezo.jpeg
Blas de Lezo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Inter County Judicial Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Blas de Lezo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Blas de Lezo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Inter County Judicial Services company.

In the current year, Blas de Lezo company and Inter County Judicial Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Blas de Lezo company nor Inter County Judicial Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Blas de Lezo company nor Inter County Judicial Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Blas de Lezo company nor Inter County Judicial Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Inter County Judicial Services company nor Blas de Lezo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Inter County Judicial Services nor Blas de Lezo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Blas de Lezo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Inter County Judicial Services company.

Blas de Lezo company employs more people globally than Inter County Judicial Services company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Inter County Judicial Services nor Blas de Lezo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Inter County Judicial Services nor Blas de Lezo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Inter County Judicial Services nor Blas de Lezo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Inter County Judicial Services nor Blas de Lezo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Inter County Judicial Services nor Blas de Lezo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Inter County Judicial Services nor Blas de Lezo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References