InPost Group Company Cyber Security Posture

inpost.eu

InPost S.A. โ€“ a company listed on Euronext Amsterdam - is the leading out-of-home e-commerce enablement platform in Europe. InPost Group operates across key geographies: Poland, the UK, Italy and the Iberian Peninsula, as well as France and Benelux, through its subsidiary, Mondial Relay. In July 2021, InPost acquired the leading French logistics operator โ€“ Mondial Relay. It was the largest Polish private foreign investment and allowed the InPost Group to enter new markets. InPost Group provides modern logistics delivery through the network of more than 50,000 out-of-home pick-up points, including over 27,000 Automated Parcel Machines (โ€œAPMsโ€), as well as to-door courier and fulfilment services to e-commerce merchants. Positioned in the fast-growing e-commerce market, InPost Groupโ€™s strategy is further enhanced by its investments in technology that provides consumers, merchants and our planet a best-in-class, lower cost, more convenient and sustainable form of last-mile delivery. Through its delivery services, InPost Group is creating a greener solution for e-commerce, as APM deliveries reduce CO2 emissions due to highly efficient logistic model on last mile, as well as significantly lower traffic and noise pollution in cities. In the last full year (the 12 months to 31 December 2022), InPost Group handled 744.9 million parcel deliveries.

InPost Group Company Details

Linkedin ID:

inpost-group

Employees number:

0 employees

Number of followers:

15740.0

NAICS:

none

Industry Type:

Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage

Homepage:

inpost.eu

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

INP_3134196

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreInPost Group Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 200 and 800

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

globalscoreInPost Group Global Score
blurone
Ailogo

InPost Group Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 200 and 800

InPost Group Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
0
Attack Types
0
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView

InPost Group Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

InPost S.A. โ€“ a company listed on Euronext Amsterdam - is the leading out-of-home e-commerce enablement platform in Europe. InPost Group operates across key geographies: Poland, the UK, Italy and the Iberian Peninsula, as well as France and Benelux, through its subsidiary, Mondial Relay. In July 2021, InPost acquired the leading French logistics operator โ€“ Mondial Relay. It was the largest Polish private foreign investment and allowed the InPost Group to enter new markets. InPost Group provides modern logistics delivery through the network of more than 50,000 out-of-home pick-up points, including over 27,000 Automated Parcel Machines (โ€œAPMsโ€), as well as to-door courier and fulfilment services to e-commerce merchants. Positioned in the fast-growing e-commerce market, InPost Groupโ€™s strategy is further enhanced by its investments in technology that provides consumers, merchants and our planet a best-in-class, lower cost, more convenient and sustainable form of last-mile delivery. Through its delivery services, InPost Group is creating a greener solution for e-commerce, as APM deliveries reduce CO2 emissions due to highly efficient logistic model on last mile, as well as significantly lower traffic and noise pollution in cities. In the last full year (the 12 months to 31 December 2022), InPost Group handled 744.9 million parcel deliveries.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=inpost-group' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

InPost Group Cyber Security News

2025-06-10T10:01:09.000Z
SoSafe closes cybersecurity gap in SMEs with new MSP platform

The SoSafe MSP platform was developed specifically for managed service providers (MSPs). It enables scalable security training and phishingย ...

2025-03-26T07:00:00.000Z
Preparing for Cybersecurity Disclosure as a Public Company

SEC's new rules require IPO companies to enhance cybersecurity disclosures, addressing risks, management, strategy, governance, and incidentย ...

2025-01-29T08:00:00.000Z
How SEALSQ's New Patents Could Revolutionize Quantum-Safe Semiconductors

SEALSQ's patents represent a robust foundation for the future of secure semiconductors, cryptographic processing, and post-quantum securityย ...

2025-01-29T08:00:00.000Z
Scores of Critical UK Government IT Systems Have Major Security Holes

The National Audit Office warns of major gaps in cyber resilience across UK government departments.

2025-01-22T08:00:00.000Z
Accenture Invests in QuSecure to Protect Against Future Quantum Threats with Crypto Agility

Accenture has made a strategic investment, through Accenture Ventures, in QuSecure โ„ข a leader in post-quantum cybersecurity.

2024-10-18T07:00:00.000Z
Facts and figures: Women, peace, and security

Conflict, instability, and violence are on the rise with devastating consequences for women and girls. Here are some key facts and data:.

2025-01-21T08:00:00.000Z
Security in Alawite regions in post-Assad Syria

Syria's first post-Assad protests broke out on Dec. 25 after a video claiming to show the destruction of an Alawite shrine spread rapidlyย ...

2025-01-29T08:00:00.000Z
SEALSQ Strengthens its Leadership in Post-Quantum Security by Expanding Its Patent Portfolio

SEALSQ has built an extensive and strategically important patent portfolio, primarily focused on secure microcontroller technologies and related applications.

2024-10-01T07:00:00.000Z
Post Office ditches MoneyGram after cyber attack

MoneyGram services will no longer be available in thousands of Post Office branches from today, as its contract renewal is cancelled in theย ...

similarCompanies

InPost Group Similar Companies

Nagel-Group

Our motivation Over 500 million people in Europe have to be supplied with fresh food every day. We contribute to ensuring this is possible. About us The Nagel-Group, which specialises in food logistics, employs over 11,000 people at more than 130 locations. With around 7,000 vehicles, the Nagel-Gro

Aramex South Africa

Aramex is a provider of comprehensive logistics and transportation solutions. Established in 1982, as an express operator, Aramex rapidly transformed itself into a global brand recognized for its customized services and innovative multi-product offering. Our range of services includes international

DTDC Express Limited

DTDC Express Ltd is one of Indiaโ€šร„รดs leading integrated express logistics company offering domestic and international services. DTDC offers a comprehensive range of technology-enabled logistics services, serving a wide spectrum of customers across diverse industry verticals. Today, DTDC operates Ind

DHL Supply Chain

As the worldโ€™s largest contract logistics specialist, we create competitive advantage for customers through customized logistics solutions based on globally standardized warehousing, transportation and integrated services components. We bring sector expertise, global scale and local knowledge to des

Grupo Almo

Somos un grupo lรญder en la industria de seguridad, servicios de transporte de valores, paqueterรญa y courier. Operamos en Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica y Panamรก. Hemos sido el lรญder en la mayorรญa de los segmentos del negocio por mรกs de 40 aรฑos. Actualmente empleamos m

DP World

Trade is the lifeblood of the global economy, creating opportunities and improving the quality of life for people around the world. DP World exists to make the worldโ€™s trade flow better, changing whatโ€™s possible for the customers and communities we serve globally. With a dedicated, diverse and p

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

InPost Group CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, InPost Group has faced 0 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, InPost Group has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as InPost S.A. โ€“ a company listed on Euronext Amsterdam - is the leading out-of-home e-commerce enablement platform in Europe. InPost Group operates across key geographies: Poland, the UK, Italy and the Iberian Peninsula, as well as France and Benelux, through its subsidiary, Mondial Relay. In July 2021, InPost acquired the leading French logistics operator โ€“ Mondial Relay. It was the largest Polish private foreign investment and allowed the InPost Group to enter new markets. InPost Group provides modern logistics delivery through the network of more than 50,000 out-of-home pick-up points, including over 27,000 Automated Parcel Machines (โ€œAPMsโ€), as well as to-door courier and fulfilment services to e-commerce merchants. Positioned in the fast-growing e-commerce market, InPost Groupโ€™s strategy is further enhanced by its investments in technology that provides consumers, merchants and our planet a best-in-class, lower cost, more convenient and sustainable form of last-mile delivery. Through its delivery services, InPost Group is creating a greener solution for e-commerce, as APM deliveries reduce CO2 emissions due to highly efficient logistic model on last mile, as well as significantly lower traffic and noise pollution in cities. In the last full year (the 12 months to 31 December 2022), InPost Group handled 744.9 million parcel deliveries..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge