IFSul de Minas Gerais Company Cyber Security Posture
ifsuldeminas.edu.brCriado em 2008, o Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sul de Minas Gerais originou-se a partir da fusão de três antigas escolas agrotécnicas localizadas nos municípios de Inconfidentes, Machado e Muzambinho. Assim, essas três unidades tornaram-se campus, formando uma só instituição e assumindo um novo compromisso: o desenvolvimento regional por meio da excelência na educação profissional e tecnológica. Hoje, o IFSULDEMINAS atua em diversos níveis: médio, técnico, graduação e pós-graduação, em 27 diferentes áreas. Possui campus também nas cidades de Passos, Poços de Caldas e Pouso Alegre, onde estão sendo investidos recursos na construção e reforma de prédios próprios, com infraestrutura e equipamentos capazes de atender a demanda de alunos. O objetivo é ampliar o acesso ao ensino profissionalizante nos 178 municípios de abrangência, beneficiando 3,5 milhões de pessoas, direta ou indiretamente. Articulando a tríade Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão, o Instituto Federal do Sul de Minas trabalha em função das necessidades regionais, capacitando mão-de-obra, prestando serviços, desenvolvendo pesquisa aplicada que atenda as demandas da economia local e projetos que colaboram para a qualidade de vida da população. No campus Muzambinho, por exemplo, o laboratório de Bromatologia permite à comunidade atestar a qualidade da água consumida; em Machado, crianças com patologias cerebrais fazem tratamento gratuito no Centro de Equoterapia; em Inconfidentes, uma incubadora de empresas difunde o empreendedorismo e insere empresas no mercado.
IDMG Company Details
ifsul-de-minas-gerais
10,001+ employees
0
611
Higher Education
ifsuldeminas.edu.br
Scan still pending
IFS_3164833
In-progress
IDMG Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
IDMG Global Score.png)
IFSul de Minas Gerais Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
IFSul de Minas Gerais Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
IFSul de Minas Gerais Company Subsidiaries
Criado em 2008, o Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sul de Minas Gerais originou-se a partir da fusão de três antigas escolas agrotécnicas localizadas nos municípios de Inconfidentes, Machado e Muzambinho. Assim, essas três unidades tornaram-se campus, formando uma só instituição e assumindo um novo compromisso: o desenvolvimento regional por meio da excelência na educação profissional e tecnológica. Hoje, o IFSULDEMINAS atua em diversos níveis: médio, técnico, graduação e pós-graduação, em 27 diferentes áreas. Possui campus também nas cidades de Passos, Poços de Caldas e Pouso Alegre, onde estão sendo investidos recursos na construção e reforma de prédios próprios, com infraestrutura e equipamentos capazes de atender a demanda de alunos. O objetivo é ampliar o acesso ao ensino profissionalizante nos 178 municípios de abrangência, beneficiando 3,5 milhões de pessoas, direta ou indiretamente. Articulando a tríade Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão, o Instituto Federal do Sul de Minas trabalha em função das necessidades regionais, capacitando mão-de-obra, prestando serviços, desenvolvendo pesquisa aplicada que atenda as demandas da economia local e projetos que colaboram para a qualidade de vida da população. No campus Muzambinho, por exemplo, o laboratório de Bromatologia permite à comunidade atestar a qualidade da água consumida; em Machado, crianças com patologias cerebrais fazem tratamento gratuito no Centro de Equoterapia; em Inconfidentes, uma incubadora de empresas difunde o empreendedorismo e insere empresas no mercado.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
IDMG Cyber Security News
A cybersecurity play set to run even higher, and how to trade this week's inflation reports
Frank Holland breaks down what traders are watching ahead of the new session.
NSA Validates Northwood’s Program of Study in Cybersecurity Management
“Northwood students are now graduating with documentation verifying they've completed a nationally validated cybersecurity curriculum,” stated ...
Trump executive order rewrites US cybersecurity playbook, targets foreign threats and federal bloat
President Trump has directed the federal government to prioritize the advancement of secure software development across all systems and ...
Cybersecurity Grows as a Manufacturing Risk: Evaluate, Educate, and Stay Vigilant
The industry is currently seeing two primary types of attacks: Ransomware and extortion; Attacks aiming to inflict physical damage. While many ...
Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill: Tech And Cybersecurity Implications
Trump's sweeping “Big Beautiful Bill” reshapes tech, AI and cybersecurity policy while fueling tensions in Washington and triggering a ...
Guardz collects $56M to bring enterprise-grade cybersecurity to smaller businesses
Cybersecurity services firm Guardz Cyber Ltd. said it has closed on a $56 million Series B round of funding today as it scrambles to help ...
Trump Administration Revises Cybersecurity Rules, Replaces Biden and Obama Orders
A new Trump Executive Order limits the use of cybersecurity-related sanctions only against foreign malicious actors.
Expanding on ADHICS v2.0: A Closer Look at Healthcare Cybersecurity in the UAE
Explore ADHICS v2.0 and how it strengthens UAE healthcare cybersecurity with six pillars for resilience, compliance, and innovation.
Zero-Trust, Full Stack: Embedding Cybersecurity Principles Into Site Reliability Engineering Culture
We must remember that the central aspect of zero-trust in SRE is changing the team's approach to cybersecurity, not only replacing tools.
IDMG Similar Companies
University of Pennsylvania
The University of Pennsylvania is one of the oldest universities in America and, as a member of the Ivy League, one of the most prestigious institutions of higher learning in all the world. Penn is home to 12 schools including the School of Arts and Sciences, the School of Nursing, the School of Eng
University of Leeds
Leeds is among the top ten universities for research power in the UK. Our academic breadth, commitment to quality and determination to make a genuine impact on the world around us enables us to achieve extraordinary results in: • Creating knowledge through research and innovation. • Disseminating i
Carnegie Mellon University
Carnegie Mellon University founder Andrew Carnegie said: "My heart is in the work." No statement better captures the passion and drive of our people to make a real difference. At Carnegie Mellon, we're not afraid of the work. Our educational environment creates problem solvers, drivers of
Postgrados Universidad Mayor
Nuestra Misión es formar profesionales de excelencia a través de un modelo educativo basado en una visión integradora de los procesos formativos, que promueve el saber y el saber aplicado, con un enfoque preferentemente profesionalizante. Nuestros programas son pertinentes a las necesidades de co
The California State University
The California State University is the largest system of four-year higher education in the country, with 23 campuses, 56,000 faculty and staff and more than 450,000 students. Created in 1960, the mission of the CSU is to provide high-quality, affordable education to meet the ever-changing needs of
Baylor College of Medicine
Baylor College of Medicine is a health sciences university that creates knowledge and applies science and discoveries to further education, healthcare and community service locally and globally. Located in the Texas Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine has affiliations with eight teaching hosp
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
IDMG CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, IDMG has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, IDMG has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Criado em 2008, o Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sul de Minas Gerais originou-se a partir da fusão de três antigas escolas agrotécnicas localizadas nos municípios de Inconfidentes, Machado e Muzambinho. Assim, essas três unidades tornaram-se campus, formando uma só instituição e assumindo um novo compromisso: o desenvolvimento regional por meio da excelência na educação profissional e tecnológica. Hoje, o IFSULDEMINAS atua em diversos níveis: médio, técnico, graduação e pós-graduação, em 27 diferentes áreas. Possui campus também nas cidades de Passos, Poços de Caldas e Pouso Alegre, onde estão sendo investidos recursos na construção e reforma de prédios próprios, com infraestrutura e equipamentos capazes de atender a demanda de alunos. O objetivo é ampliar o acesso ao ensino profissionalizante nos 178 municípios de abrangência, beneficiando 3,5 milhões de pessoas, direta ou indiretamente. Articulando a tríade Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão, o Instituto Federal do Sul de Minas trabalha em função das necessidades regionais, capacitando mão-de-obra, prestando serviços, desenvolvendo pesquisa aplicada que atenda as demandas da economia local e projetos que colaboram para a qualidade de vida da população. No campus Muzambinho, por exemplo, o laboratório de Bromatologia permite à comunidade atestar a qualidade da água consumida; em Machado, crianças com patologias cerebrais fazem tratamento gratuito no Centro de Equoterapia; em Inconfidentes, uma incubadora de empresas difunde o empreendedorismo e insere empresas no mercado..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
