Comparison Overview

IDEMIA

VS

Atlassian

IDEMIA

2 place Samuel Champlain, Courbevoie, 92400, FR
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.idemia.com/business/idemia-secure-transactions

IDEMIA Secure Transactions (IST) is a leading provider of payment, connectivity, and cybersecurity solutions, serving billions of people worldwide. With decades of expertise in cryptography and credential issuance, IST is trusted by over 2000 financial institutions, mobile operators, automotive manufacturers, and IoT providers worldwide. IST is a division of IDEMIA Group. IDEMIA Public Security, another division of IDEMIA Group, is the premium provider of convenient and trusted biometric-based solutions, transforming public and private organizations across the globe. Follow them here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/idemia-public-security/

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 12,635
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Atlassian

Level 6/341 George St, Sydney, NSW, AU, 2000
Last Update: 2026-03-30
Between 700 and 749
https://atlassian.com/

Atlassian powers the collaboration that helps teams accomplish what would otherwise be impossible alone. From space missions and motor racing to bugs in code and IT requests, no task is too large or too small with the right team, the right tools, and the right practices. Over 300,000 global companies and 80% of the Fortune 500 rely on Atlassian’s software, like Jira, Confluence, Loom, and Trello, to help their teams work better together and deliver quality results on time. With our 300,000+ customers and team of 10,000+ Atlassians, we are building the next generation of team collaboration and productivity software. We believe the power of teams has the potential to change the world — one that is more open, authentic, and inclusive.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 21,511
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idemiagroup.jpeg
IDEMIA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlassian.jpeg
Atlassian
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IDEMIA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atlassian
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IDEMIA in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Atlassian has 66.67% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — IDEMIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IDEMIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atlassian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlassian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idemiagroup.jpeg
IDEMIA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlassian.jpeg
Atlassian
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious JavaScript injection via Icon URL field in custom priority settings
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Authenticated access with elevated privileges
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Voice Phishing (Vishing), Phishing Kits, MFA Bypass (Push Notifications, OTPs)
Motivation: Data Theft, Financial Gain, Credential Harvesting
Blog: Blog

FAQ

IDEMIA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atlassian company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Atlassian company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas IDEMIA company has not reported any.

In the current year, Atlassian company has reported more cyber incidents than IDEMIA company.

Neither Atlassian company nor IDEMIA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Atlassian company nor IDEMIA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Atlassian company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while IDEMIA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Atlassian company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while IDEMIA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither IDEMIA nor Atlassian holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IDEMIA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Atlassian company.

Atlassian company employs more people globally than IDEMIA company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither IDEMIA nor Atlassian holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IDEMIA nor Atlassian holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IDEMIA nor Atlassian holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IDEMIA nor Atlassian holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IDEMIA nor Atlassian holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IDEMIA nor Atlassian holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References