Comparison Overview

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

VS

International Rescue Committee

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

19, avenue de la Paix, Geneva, Geneva, CH, 1202
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1863, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) works worldwide to provide humanitarian help for people affected by conflict and armed violence and to promote the laws that protect victims of war. An independent and neutral organization, its mandate stems essentially from the Geneva Conventions of 1949. It takes action in response to emergencies and promotes respect for international humanitarian law and its implementation in national law. We work closely with National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and with their International Federation to ensure a concerted, rational and rapid humanitarian response to the needs of the victims of armed conflict or any other situation of internal violence. Find out more about the ICRC by visiting the following links: Where we work http://www.icrc.org/en/where-we-work Working for the ICRC https://careers.icrc.org/ https://www.icrc.org/en/join-icrc-and-help-protect-lives-and-dignity Current Opportunities https://bit.ly/2GuHdZR

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13,847
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

International Rescue Committee

122 E 42st , New York, NY, US, 10168
Last Update: 2026-03-30
Between 800 and 849

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world’s worst humanitarian crises and help people to survive, recover, and gain control of their future. Founded in 1933 at the request of Albert Einstein, the IRC offers lifesaving care and life-changing assistance to refugees and displaced people forced to flee from war or disaster. At work today in over 50+ countries and in 28 U.S. cities, the IRC restores safety, dignity and hope to millions who are uprooted and struggling to endure.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13,311
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icrc.jpeg
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-rescue-committee.jpeg
International Rescue Committee
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
International Rescue Committee
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC in 2026.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Rescue Committee in 2026.

Incident History — International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — International Rescue Committee (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Rescue Committee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icrc.jpeg
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2022
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-rescue-committee.jpeg
International Rescue Committee
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

International Rescue Committee company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas International Rescue Committee company has not reported any.

In the current year, International Rescue Committee company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither International Rescue Committee company nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither International Rescue Committee company nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither International Rescue Committee company nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company nor International Rescue Committee company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor International Rescue Committee holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both International Rescue Committee company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company employs more people globally than International Rescue Committee company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor International Rescue Committee holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor International Rescue Committee holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor International Rescue Committee holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor International Rescue Committee holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor International Rescue Committee holds HIPAA certification.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor International Rescue Committee holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H