HYMC ISRAEL - Hillel Yaffe Medical Center Company Cyber Security Posture
hymc.org.ilHillel Yaffe Medical Center (HYMC) is a multi-disciplinary nonprofit public hospital, owned and operated by the government of Israel. It is located in the north-central city of Hadera, midway between Haifa and Tel-Aviv on the Mediterranean coast. At Hillel Yaffe our clinical excellence derives from a unique synergy of professional expertise, experience, state of the art equipment and facilliities, and the prioritization of academic collaboration, education and research. As the largest hospital and only regional trauma center for more than 100km between Haifa and Tel Aviv, Hillel Yaffe excells at the treatment of road accident injuries and other trauma cases. The hospital enjoys academic affilitations with Technion Israel Institute of Technology and Tel Aviv University. Our unique facility is a microcosm of our country and its diverse and colorful population. Doctors, nurses, administrative staff and patients all reflect the various ethnic and cultural groups living in this area of Israel. The hospital serves a population of about 550,000 people: including new immigrants from the former Soviet Union, Ethiopia, and other countries, as well as a wide range of ethnic and religious communities. Hillel Yaffe is a modern medical center committed to excellence and professionalism, and to the creation of safe, supportive work environments where our staff can reach their full potential while providing top level service, compassion and care to our patients and community.
HI-HYMC Company Details
hymc-israel-hillel-yaffe-medical-center
185 employees
749.0
62
Hospitals and Health Care
hymc.org.il
Scan still pending
HYM_3762403
In-progress
HI-HYMC Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
HI-HYMC Global Score.png)
HYMC ISRAEL - Hillel Yaffe Medical Center Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
HYMC ISRAEL - Hillel Yaffe Medical Center Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYMC ISRAEL - Hillel Yaffe Medical Center | Breach | 100 | 5 | 08/2023 | HYM6623823 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization’s existenceDescription: Hillel Yaffe Hospital suffered from the data breach incident on August 2023. Hillel Yaffe Hospital in Hadera and the Mor Institute, which has numerous outpatient clinics throughout the country, were forced to move to an emergency format after cyber attacks. | |||||||
| HYMC ISRAEL - Hillel Yaffe Medical Center | Ransomware | 100 | 7 | 10/2021 | HYM204526222 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack that could injure or kill peopleDescription: The Hillel Yaffe Medical Center in Israel was targeted in a ransomware attack. The hospital had to cancel non-urgent procedures as its systems were compromised by the attackers. The hospital was still handling the patients but by using alternative systems. | |||||||
HYMC ISRAEL - Hillel Yaffe Medical Center Company Subsidiaries
Hillel Yaffe Medical Center (HYMC) is a multi-disciplinary nonprofit public hospital, owned and operated by the government of Israel. It is located in the north-central city of Hadera, midway between Haifa and Tel-Aviv on the Mediterranean coast. At Hillel Yaffe our clinical excellence derives from a unique synergy of professional expertise, experience, state of the art equipment and facilliities, and the prioritization of academic collaboration, education and research. As the largest hospital and only regional trauma center for more than 100km between Haifa and Tel Aviv, Hillel Yaffe excells at the treatment of road accident injuries and other trauma cases. The hospital enjoys academic affilitations with Technion Israel Institute of Technology and Tel Aviv University. Our unique facility is a microcosm of our country and its diverse and colorful population. Doctors, nurses, administrative staff and patients all reflect the various ethnic and cultural groups living in this area of Israel. The hospital serves a population of about 550,000 people: including new immigrants from the former Soviet Union, Ethiopia, and other countries, as well as a wide range of ethnic and religious communities. Hillel Yaffe is a modern medical center committed to excellence and professionalism, and to the creation of safe, supportive work environments where our staff can reach their full potential while providing top level service, compassion and care to our patients and community.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
HI-HYMC Cyber Security News
When all computers shut down: the clinical impact of a major cyber-attack on a general hospital
This study aims to describe a major attack on an entire medical center that resulted in a complete shutdown of all computer systems.
HI-HYMC Similar Companies
Sentara Health
Sentara Health, an integrated, not-for-profit health care delivery system, celebrates more than 130 years in pursuit of its mission - "we improve health every day." Sentara is one of the largest health systems in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Southeast, and among the top 20 largest not-for-profit integr
Team Olivia AB
Team Olivia är ett ledande nordiskt omsorgsföretag med tjänster inom bland annat personlig assistans, individ- och familjeomsorg och hemomsorg. Vi finns nära våra kunder på över 200 platser i Sverige, Norge och Danmark. Våra 12 000 medarbetare arbetar för att göra varje enskilt liv rikare och mer vä
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Nationwide Children’s is one of America's largest pediatric hospitals, an international leader in research and is ranked in all 10 specialties on U.S. News & World Report’s 2024-25 “America’s Best Children’s Hospitals” list. Our staff, comprised of 1,600 medical professionals and over 15,000 employe
Ardent Health
Ardent Health is a leading provider of healthcare in communities across the country. With a focus on consumer-friendly processes and investments in innovative services and technologies, Ardent is passionate about making healthcare better and easier to access. Through its subsidiaries, Ardent owns an
United Medical Center
Jobs Welcome to the University of Maryland Medical System (UMMS) job opportunities. We're improving the world of medicine every day throughout Maryland and beyond. UMMS provides you with the training and support that promotes professional growth. Join us! Be part of a team that collaborates to off
Ardent Health
Ardent Health is a leading provider of healthcare in communities across the country. With a focus on consumer-friendly processes and investments in innovative services and technologies, Ardent is passionate about making healthcare better and easier to access. Through its subsidiaries, Ardent owns an
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
HI-HYMC CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, HI-HYMC has faced 2 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Ransomware', 'Breach'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Hillel Yaffe Medical Center (HYMC) is a multi-disciplinary nonprofit public hospital, owned and operated by the government of Israel. It is located in the north-central city of Hadera, midway between Haifa and Tel-Aviv on the Mediterranean coast. At Hillel Yaffe our clinical excellence derives from a unique synergy of professional expertise, experience, state of the art equipment and facilliities, and the prioritization of academic collaboration, education and research. As the largest hospital and only regional trauma center for more than 100km between Haifa and Tel Aviv, Hillel Yaffe excells at the treatment of road accident injuries and other trauma cases. The hospital enjoys academic affilitations with Technion Israel Institute of Technology and Tel Aviv University. Our unique facility is a microcosm of our country and its diverse and colorful population. Doctors, nurses, administrative staff and patients all reflect the various ethnic and cultural groups living in this area of Israel. The hospital serves a population of about 550,000 people: including new immigrants from the former Soviet Union, Ethiopia, and other countries, as well as a wide range of ethnic and religious communities. Hillel Yaffe is a modern medical center committed to excellence and professionalism, and to the creation of safe, supportive work environments where our staff can reach their full potential while providing top level service, compassion and care to our patients and community. .
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
