Comparison Overview

Holcim

VS

Hassan Allam Holding

Holcim

Grafenauweg 10, Zug, CH, 6300
Last Update: 2026-04-02
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.holcim.com/

Holcim is the leading partner for sustainable construction with net sales of CHF 15.7 billion in 2025, creating value across the built environment from infrastructure and industry to buildings. We have more than 45 000 employees in 43 attractive markets – across Europe, Latin America and Asia, Middle East & Africa – and have been recognized as a Global Top Employer by the Top Employers Institute. Holcim offers high-value end-to-end Building Materials and Building Solutions, from foundations and flooring to walling and roofing – powered by premium brands including ECOPact, ECOPlanet and ECOCycle.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 41,711
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Hassan Allam Holding

Yehia Zakaria Street, Industrial-Lot 5, Sheraton Helioplis Housing., Cairo, EG
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hassanallam.com

Hassan Allam Holding is a leading group with a focus on engineering and construction, and investment and development. The Group operates in diverse sectors including infrastructure, energy, water, industrial, logistics, petrochemical, and complex large-scale projects in Egypt and the MENA region. The founders of Hassan Allam Holding commenced operations in 1936, making the oldest construction franchise in the MENA region with a solid reputation, superior technical capabilities, and a diversified portfolio. With a legacy of identifying and investing in attractive infrastructure projects, in the past five years, it has delivered over 70 projects and has a current backlog exceeding USD 5 billion. The Group is named among the Engineering News-Record (ENR) list of the top 250 global contractors. Today, we continue to lead our industry with a large dynamic business, employing more than 50,000 employees in Egypt and the MENA Region.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 11,861
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holcim.jpeg
Holcim
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hassan-allam-holding.jpeg
Hassan Allam Holding
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Holcim
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hassan Allam Holding
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holcim in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hassan Allam Holding in 2026.

Incident History — Holcim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holcim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hassan Allam Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hassan Allam Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holcim.jpeg
Holcim
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hassan-allam-holding.jpeg
Hassan Allam Holding
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Holcim company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hassan Allam Holding company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hassan Allam Holding company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Holcim company.

In the current year, Hassan Allam Holding company and Holcim company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hassan Allam Holding company nor Holcim company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hassan Allam Holding company nor Holcim company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hassan Allam Holding company nor Holcim company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Holcim company nor Hassan Allam Holding company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Holcim nor Hassan Allam Holding holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Holcim company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hassan Allam Holding company.

Holcim company employs more people globally than Hassan Allam Holding company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither Holcim nor Hassan Allam Holding holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Holcim nor Hassan Allam Holding holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Holcim nor Hassan Allam Holding holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Holcim nor Hassan Allam Holding holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Holcim nor Hassan Allam Holding holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Holcim nor Hassan Allam Holding holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References