Comparison Overview

Hitachi Energy

VS

Exelon

Hitachi Energy

Brown-Boveri Strasse 5, Zurich, CH
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

Hitachi Energy is a global technology leader in electrification, powering a sustainable energy future with innovative power grid technologies with digital at the core. Over three billion people depend on our technologies to power their daily lives. With over a century in pioneering mission-critical technologies like high-voltage, transformers, automation, and power electronics, we are addressing the most urgent energy challenge of our time – balancing soaring electricity demand, while decarbonizing the power system. With an unparalleled installed base in over 140 countries, we co-create and build long-term partnerships across the utility, industry, transportation, data centers, and infrastructure sectors. Headquartered in Switzerland, we employ over 50,000 people in 60 countries and generate revenues of around $16 billion USD.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 35,103
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Exelon

10 S. Dearborn, Chicago, 60603, US
Last Update: 2026-03-27
Between 800 and 849

Exelon Corporation (Nasdaq: EXC) is one of the nation’s largest utility companies, serving more than 10 million customers through six fully regulated utilities. We believe that reliable and affordable energy is essential to a brighter, more sustainable future. We are a FORTUNE 250 company operating across a large urban footprint, serving major metro areas in Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Exelon is recognized as an industry leader with best-in-class operations, a firm commitment to maintaining energy affordability, a track record of top-quartile reliability performance, strong ESG leadership and principles, and a deep dedication to supporting and investing in the communities we serve.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 19,357
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hitachienergy.jpeg
Hitachi Energy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exelon.jpeg
Exelon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hitachi Energy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Exelon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hitachi Energy in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exelon in 2026.

Incident History — Hitachi Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hitachi Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Exelon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exelon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hitachienergy.jpeg
Hitachi Energy
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Zero-day vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exelon.jpeg
Exelon
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Exelon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hitachi Energy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hitachi Energy company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Exelon company has not reported any.

In the current year, Exelon company and Hitachi Energy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Exelon company nor Hitachi Energy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Exelon company nor Hitachi Energy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Exelon company nor Hitachi Energy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hitachi Energy company nor Exelon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hitachi Energy nor Exelon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Exelon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hitachi Energy company.

Hitachi Energy company employs more people globally than Exelon company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Hitachi Energy nor Exelon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hitachi Energy nor Exelon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hitachi Energy nor Exelon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hitachi Energy nor Exelon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hitachi Energy nor Exelon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hitachi Energy nor Exelon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H