Comparison Overview

Hilton Grand Vacations

VS

Aramark

Hilton Grand Vacations

5323 Millenia Lakes Boulevard, Orlando, 32839, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://careers.hgv.com/

Hilton Grand Vacations is a global leader in vacation ownership, developing, marketing and operating a portfolio of high-quality, shared-ownership properties in highly desired vacation destinations. Our company also manages and operates innovative club membership programs providing exclusive exchange, leisure travel, and reservation services for our Members. At Hilton Grand Vacations, our culture of hospitality extends to our more than 10,000 Team Members who collectively play an important role in delivering exceptional service, quality accommodations, and memorable travel experiences. That’s why we’ve created a workplace that supports growth, opportunity, work-life balance, and respect throughout our Club affiliated properties, sales centers, and corporate offices around the globe.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 14,410
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Aramark

2400 Market St, Philadelphia, 19103, US
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aramark.com

Aramark (NYSE: ARMK) proudly serves the world’s leading educational institutions, Fortune 500 companies, world champion sports teams, prominent healthcare providers, iconic destinations and cultural attractions, and numerous municipalities in 16 countries around the world with food and facilities management. Because of our hospitality culture, our employees strive to do great things for each other, our partners, our communities, and the planet.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 54,652
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hilton-grand-vacations.jpeg
Hilton Grand Vacations
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aramark.jpeg
Aramark
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hilton Grand Vacations
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aramark
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hilton Grand Vacations in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aramark in 2026.

Incident History — Hilton Grand Vacations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hilton Grand Vacations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aramark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aramark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hilton-grand-vacations.jpeg
Hilton Grand Vacations
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aramark.jpeg
Aramark
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Hilton Grand Vacations company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aramark company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Aramark company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Hilton Grand Vacations company has not reported any.

In the current year, Aramark company and Hilton Grand Vacations company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aramark company nor Hilton Grand Vacations company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Aramark company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Hilton Grand Vacations company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Aramark company nor Hilton Grand Vacations company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hilton Grand Vacations company nor Aramark company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hilton Grand Vacations nor Aramark holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hilton Grand Vacations company nor Aramark company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Aramark company employs more people globally than Hilton Grand Vacations company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Hilton Grand Vacations nor Aramark holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hilton Grand Vacations nor Aramark holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hilton Grand Vacations nor Aramark holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hilton Grand Vacations nor Aramark holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hilton Grand Vacations nor Aramark holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hilton Grand Vacations nor Aramark holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References