Heartland Mutual Insurance Company Cyber Security Posture

heartlandmutualinsurance.com

Heartland Farm Mutual Inc. became a legal entity, formed from the merger of North Waterloo Farmers Mutual and Oxford Mutual. These two parent companies brought together long-standing experience in serving Ontarioโ€™s insurance needs. In August 2021, Heartland Farm Mutual amalgamated with The Kings Mutual Insurance Company of Berwick, Nova Scotia. The Kings Mutual Insurance Company has been fulfilling the needs of residential, commercial, and agricultural policyholders in Nova Scotia since 1904. Heartland Farm Mutual is in your community. Whether you're in agriculture, a business owner or a homeowner, more than ever, people like you appreciate the value of the mutual insurance alternative. Our Vision To be the leading Mutual dedicated to fulfilling our promise with a personal approach. Our Mission Providing tailored insurance solutions through exemplary customer experience-building on our legacy of protecting agribusiness and communities. Our Values โ€ข Integrity โ€“ Our strong moral principles are demonstrated by our commitment to honesty and fairness in all our interactions. โ€ข Diversity and Inclusion โ€“ We recognize and appreciate diversity and value the contributions of all by fostering an inclusive environment. โ€ข Accountability โ€“ We deliver on our promises and assume ownership of our actions. โ€ข Community & Environment โ€“ We contribute positively to improve the quality of life and the sustainability of our communities. โ€ข Progressive โ€“ We seize value opportunities and embrace change. โ€ข Customer Focus โ€“ We focus on providing the best customer experience and create outcomes that deliver long term value.

HMI Company Details

Linkedin ID:

heartland-mutual-insurance

Employees number:

120 employees

Number of followers:

2225

NAICS:

524

Industry Type:

Insurance

Homepage:

heartlandmutualinsurance.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

HEA_1618605

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreHMI Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

Ailogo

Heartland Mutual Insurance Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

Heartland Mutual Insurance Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView
Heartland Mutual InsuranceBreach50207/2020HEA193713123Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Heartland Farm Mutual, which provides insurance for agricultural businesses across Canada, experienced a data breach. A small number of personal records had been accessed by an unknown party during the incident. An unauthorized actor accessed an employeeโ€™s email inbox, which contained the personal details of customers. The company quickly blocked the unauthorized access and employed an external cybersecurity team to investigate.

Heartland Mutual Insurance Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Heartland Farm Mutual Inc. became a legal entity, formed from the merger of North Waterloo Farmers Mutual and Oxford Mutual. These two parent companies brought together long-standing experience in serving Ontarioโ€™s insurance needs. In August 2021, Heartland Farm Mutual amalgamated with The Kings Mutual Insurance Company of Berwick, Nova Scotia. The Kings Mutual Insurance Company has been fulfilling the needs of residential, commercial, and agricultural policyholders in Nova Scotia since 1904. Heartland Farm Mutual is in your community. Whether you're in agriculture, a business owner or a homeowner, more than ever, people like you appreciate the value of the mutual insurance alternative. Our Vision To be the leading Mutual dedicated to fulfilling our promise with a personal approach. Our Mission Providing tailored insurance solutions through exemplary customer experience-building on our legacy of protecting agribusiness and communities. Our Values โ€ข Integrity โ€“ Our strong moral principles are demonstrated by our commitment to honesty and fairness in all our interactions. โ€ข Diversity and Inclusion โ€“ We recognize and appreciate diversity and value the contributions of all by fostering an inclusive environment. โ€ข Accountability โ€“ We deliver on our promises and assume ownership of our actions. โ€ข Community & Environment โ€“ We contribute positively to improve the quality of life and the sustainability of our communities. โ€ข Progressive โ€“ We seize value opportunities and embrace change. โ€ข Customer Focus โ€“ We focus on providing the best customer experience and create outcomes that deliver long term value.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=heartland-mutual-insurance' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

HMI Cyber Security News

2020-07-07T07:00:00.000Z
Data breach at Canadian insurance firm exposes personal information

Incident at Heartland Farm Mutual could have exposed sensitive data. Canadian insurance firm falls victim to data breach.

2017-08-17T13:53:54.000Z
Heartland Data Breach Update: Thousands of Institutions Impacted

Heartland, the sixth-largest payments processor in the U.S., announced on Jan. 20 that its processing systems were breached in 2008, exposing an undeterminedย ...

similarCompanies

HMI Similar Companies

American Family Insurance

For more than 90 years, American Family Insurance has built its reputation on sound principles. We strive to provide you industry-leading service, exceptional claims experience and products that build long-term relationships. This is accomplished by treating policyholders fairly in a helpful and car

Old Republic International

Old Republic International (ORI) is one of the nation's 50 largest shareholder-owned insurance businesses and traces its beginnings to 1923. We are a member of the Fortune 500 listing of Americaโ€™s largest companies. ORIโ€™s performance reflects an entrepreneurial spirit, a long-term focus, and a corpo

Bankers Lifeยฎ focuses on the insurance and investment needs of middle-income Americans who are near or in retirement. The Bankers Life brand is part of CNO Financial Group, Inc. (NYSE: CNO), whose companies provide insurance and wealth management solutions that help protect the health and retirement

China Pacific Insurance Company

China Pacific Life Insurance Co., Ltd (CPIC Life in short) was formed on the basis of life insurance business of China Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd., which was founded on May 13th 1991, and is held by CPIC Group. The company was incorporated in November 11, 2001, headquartered in Shanghai and register

Marsh

We help our clients and colleagues grow โ€” and our communities thrive โ€” by protecting and promoting Possibility. We seek better ways to manage risk and define more effective paths to the right outcome. We go beyond risk to rewards for our clients, our company, our colleagues, and the communities in w

MGEN

Cyril, Diane, Farah, Amir, Bโˆšยฉaโ€šร„ยถ Depuis 1946, MGEN sโ€šร„รดengage aux cโˆšยฅtโˆšยฉs de tous ceux qui sโ€šร„รดengagent dans lโ€šร„รดintโˆšยฉrโˆšโ„ขt des autres. Avec 4,2 millions de personnes protโˆšยฉgโˆšยฉes, 10 000 collaborateurs et 3 500 militants, MGEN est la premiโˆšยฎre mutuelle des agents du service public. Son modโˆšยฎle un

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

HMI CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, HMI has faced 1 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Breach'].

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Heartland Farm Mutual Inc. became a legal entity, formed from the merger of North Waterloo Farmers Mutual and Oxford Mutual. These two parent companies brought together long-standing experience in serving Ontarioโ€™s insurance needs. In August 2021, Heartland Farm Mutual amalgamated with The Kings Mutual Insurance Company of Berwick, Nova Scotia. The Kings Mutual Insurance Company has been fulfilling the needs of residential, commercial, and agricultural policyholders in Nova Scotia since 1904. Heartland Farm Mutual is in your community. Whether you're in agriculture, a business owner or a homeowner, more than ever, people like you appreciate the value of the mutual insurance alternative. Our Vision To be the leading Mutual dedicated to fulfilling our promise with a personal approach. Our Mission Providing tailored insurance solutions through exemplary customer experience-building on our legacy of protecting agribusiness and communities. Our Values โ€ข Integrity โ€“ Our strong moral principles are demonstrated by our commitment to honesty and fairness in all our interactions. โ€ข Diversity and Inclusion โ€“ We recognize and appreciate diversity and value the contributions of all by fostering an inclusive environment. โ€ข Accountability โ€“ We deliver on our promises and assume ownership of our actions. โ€ข Community & Environment โ€“ We contribute positively to improve the quality of life and the sustainability of our communities. โ€ข Progressive โ€“ We seize value opportunities and embrace change. โ€ข Customer Focus โ€“ We focus on providing the best customer experience and create outcomes that deliver long term value..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge