
HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley Company Cyber Security Posture
hahv.orgHealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley, a member of Westchester Medical Center Health Network (WMCHealth) is the alignment of HealthAlliance Hospital in Kingston, N.Y., and Margaretville Hospital and Mountainside Residential Care Center in Margaretville, N.Y. For further information about HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley, visit our web site or follow us on social media. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/healthalliancehv/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/HAllianceHudVal Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/healthalliancehv
HHV Company Details
healthalliance-of-the-hudson-valley
192 employees
1478.0
62
Hospitals and Health Care
hahv.org
Scan still pending
HEA_2290275
In-progress

Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

.png)

HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley Company Scoring based on AI Models
Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley Company Cyber Security News & History
Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HealthAlliance | Breach | 85 | 4 | 12/2024 | HEA000121424 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: New York Attorney General Letitia James secured $550,000 from HealthAlliance after it failed to protect the personal and medical data of over 240,000 New Yorkers due to a cyber-attack. The breach occurred after the healthcare facility did not address a known system vulnerability highlighted by a vendor, leading to compromised patient data. HealthAlliance faced penalties and was mandated to improve its data security practices. | |||||||
HealthAlliance | Breach | 85 | 4 | 12/2024 | HEA000033125 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: HealthAlliance, a Hudson Valley healthcare facility operator, was fined $550,000 by the New York State Attorney General for failing to secure the personal and medical information of over 240,000 New Yorkers. The healthcare facility's vulnerability led to a cyber-attack after it neglected to apply a critical patch notified by its vendor, resulting in a significant data breach compromising patient data. | |||||||
HealthAlliance | Vulnerability | 85 | 4 | 12/2024 | HEA000121324 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: HealthAlliance, a healthcare facility operator in Hudson Valley, has been penalized $550,000 by the New York State Attorney General for failing to secure the personal and medical data of over 240,000 patients. A vendor-notified vulnerability was left unpatched due to technical issues, resulting in a cyber-attack that compromised patient data. HealthAlliance is now required to fortify its data security measures to prevent future lapses. |
HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley Company Subsidiaries

HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley, a member of Westchester Medical Center Health Network (WMCHealth) is the alignment of HealthAlliance Hospital in Kingston, N.Y., and Margaretville Hospital and Mountainside Residential Care Center in Margaretville, N.Y. For further information about HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley, visit our web site or follow us on social media. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/healthalliancehv/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/HAllianceHudVal Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/healthalliancehv
Access Data Using Our API

Get company history
.png)
HHV Cyber Security News
HealthAlliance sends out settlement notices as part of cyberattack that might have affected 260,000 people
HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley has sent out notices to people affected by the cyberattack that included the Kingston hospital as part of a $1.29 millionย ...
Recent Cyber Attacks Threaten Hudson Valley, New York Infrastructure
The Hudson Valley has fallen victim to a slew of cyber attacks in recent months, compromising important information from both localย ...
HealthAlliance turns three pages in December
โHealthAlliance provides essential healthcare services to New Yorkers, but it also has a responsibility to protect private medical informationย ...
HealthAlliance to pay $550K penalty for failing to protect patient data before cyberattack
HealthAlliance has agreed to pay $550,000 in penalties for failing to protect sensitive patient information that was compromised during aย ...
Hudson Valley health care system settles lawsuit following cyberattack
A $1.29 million settlement has been reached between HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley and a plaintiff who filed a lawsuit against theย ...
Hackers had access to patient information for months in New York hospital cyberattack, officials say
Patients' private data, potentially including their Social Security numbers and financial information, may have been stolen in the hack.
New York AG secures $550K settlement with health care operator over massive data breach
New York AG secures $550K settlement with health care operator over massive data breach ยท HealthAlliance's data breach compromised personal andย ...
Cyber attacks hit NY state casino operation, two Hudson Valley hospitals
New York state's casino operation and two hospitals were hit with cyber attacks over the weekend, officials said.
HealthAlliance Hospital in Kingston emptied, systems to shut down in wake of cyber attack
HealthAlliance Hospital in Kingston emptied, systems to shut down in wake of cyber attack ยท Kingston and Margaretville hospitals remain open forย ...

HHV Similar Companies

Health Service Executive
Our purpose is to provide safe, high quality health and personal social services to the population of Ireland. Our vision is a healthier Ireland with a high quality health service valued by all. Our Workforce The health service is the largest employer in the state with over 110,000 whole time equ

OhioHealth
OhioHealth is a nationally recognized, not-for-profit, faith-based health system of more than 35,000 associates, providers and volunteers. We lead with our mission to improve the health of those we serve throughout our 15 hospitals and 200+ urgent, primary and specialty care sites spanning 50 Ohio c

Yeditepe University Hospital
ะฃะฝะธะฒะตััะธัะตั ะะดะธัะตะฟะต ะฑัะป ะพัะฝะพะฒะฐะฝ ัะพะฝะดะพะผ ISTEK ะฒ 1996 ะณะพะดั. 1. ะกัะพะผะฐัะพะปะพะณะธัะตัะบะฐั ะบะปะธะฝะธะบะฐ ะฃะฝะธะฒะตััะธัะตัะฐ ะะตะดะธัะตะฟะต, 1996 ะณ. 2. ะะพะปัะฝะธัะฐ ะะพะทัััะฐะณะธ ะฃะฝะธะฒะตััะธัะตัะฐ ะะดะธัะตะฟะต ะฒ 2005 ะณ. 3. ะะพะปะธะบะปะธะฝะธะบะฐ ะะฐะณะดะฐั ะะฐะดะดะตัะธ ะฃะฝะธะฒะตััะธัะตัะฐ ะะดะธัะตะฟะต, 2006 ะณ. 4. ะะปะฐะทะฝะพะน ัะตะฝัั ะฃะฝะธะฒะตััะธัะตัะฐ ะะตะดะธัะตะฟะต, 2007 ะณ. 5. ะฆะตะฝัั ะณะตะฝะตัะธัะตัะบะพ

Apollo Hospitals
Driven by the vision of its Chairman, Dr. Prathap C. Reddy, the Apollo Hospitals Group pioneered corporate healthcare in India. Apollo revolutionized healthcare when Dr Prathap Reddy opened the first hospital in Chennai in 1983. Today Apollo is the worldโs largest integrated healthcare platform wit

Medical University of South Carolina
The Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) is a public institution of higher learning the purpose of which is to preserve and optimize human life in South Carolina and beyond. The university provides an interprofessional environment for learning and discovery through education of health care p

Aurora Health Care
Aurora Health Care is proud to be a part of Advocate Health, the third-largest nonprofit integrated health system in the U.S. Advocate Health is the third-largest nonprofit, integrated health system in the United States, created from the combination of Advocate Aurora Health and Atrium Health. Prov

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
HHV CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, HHV has faced 3 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Vulnerability', 'Breach'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley, a member of Westchester Medical Center Health Network (WMCHealth) is the alignment of HealthAlliance Hospital in Kingston, N.Y., and Margaretville Hospital and Mountainside Residential Care Center in Margaretville, N.Y. For further information about HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley, visit our web site or follow us on social media. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/healthalliancehv/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/HAllianceHudVal Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/healthalliancehv.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Breach'].
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
