Comparison Overview

GRIND

VS

TentBox

GRIND

North, Houston, Texas, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.grindbasketball.com

GRIND is a consumer brand developing the world's first smart ecosystem of sports equipment products - & we started with portable basketball rebounding machine. We aim to revolutionize the world of sports equipment, much like Nest has transformed the connected home. By leveraging cutting-edge technology, we create seamless and intuitive product experiences that blur the lines between hardware and software. Our focus is on developing sports equipment that can seamlessly connect to software, enhancing athletic performance, and pushing athletes to achieve their peak potential. At our core, GRIND empowers athletes to become the best version of themselves. builds portable rebounding machines & interactive sports equipment for athletes, built around a software training hub for aspiring athletes.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

TentBox

39 Botley Road, North Baddesley, S052 9AE, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tentbox.com

TentBox was founded in 2016 and is now the UK’s #1 Roof Top Tent brand. We're a British based company on a mission to build an inclusive, fun and happy community of TentBoxers across the world. We are revolutionising adventure by making the outdoors accessible to all. Our aim is to connect like-minded people through our common love for the wild. We're actively looking to partner with like-minded brands and companies internationally so if your company fits our ethos, please get in touch!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grind-interactive.jpeg
GRIND
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tentbox.jpeg
TentBox
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GRIND
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TentBox
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GRIND in 2026.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TentBox in 2026.

Incident History — GRIND (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GRIND cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TentBox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TentBox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grind-interactive.jpeg
GRIND
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tentbox.jpeg
TentBox
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TentBox company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GRIND company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TentBox company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GRIND company.

In the current year, TentBox company and GRIND company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TentBox company nor GRIND company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TentBox company nor GRIND company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TentBox company nor GRIND company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GRIND company nor TentBox company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GRIND nor TentBox holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GRIND company nor TentBox company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TentBox company employs more people globally than GRIND company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither GRIND nor TentBox holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GRIND nor TentBox holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GRIND nor TentBox holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GRIND nor TentBox holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GRIND nor TentBox holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GRIND nor TentBox holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References