Comparison Overview

Government of the Netherlands

VS

Region Stockholm

Government of the Netherlands

None
Last Update: 2026-04-01

Government of the Netherlands

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Region Stockholm

Lindhagensgatan 98, Stockholm, 11218, SE
Last Update: 2026-04-01

Är du beredd att tänka nytt och hitta framtidens lösningar? För vårt framtida uppdrag behöver vi medarbetare med hög kompetens, stort engagemang och som strävar efter ständig förbättring. Vid din sida kan du få engagerade kollegor inom hundratals kvalificerade yrken – ekonomer, sjuksköterskor, jurister, radiologer, ingenjörer och kirurger. Stockholms läns landsting är en av landets största arbetsgivare med ett livsviktigt uppdrag. Vi ger två miljoner invånare en effektiv kollektivtrafik och en god hälso- och sjukvård i landets snabbast växande region. Varje dag, dygnet runt.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 26,157
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/government-of-the-netherlands.jpeg
Government of the Netherlands
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regionstockholm.jpeg
Region Stockholm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Government of the Netherlands
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Region Stockholm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Government of the Netherlands in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Region Stockholm in 2026.

Incident History — Government of the Netherlands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Government of the Netherlands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Region Stockholm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Region Stockholm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/government-of-the-netherlands.jpeg
Government of the Netherlands
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: DDoS
Motivation: Ideologically pro-Russian
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regionstockholm.jpeg
Region Stockholm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Government of the Netherlands company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Region Stockholm company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Government of the Netherlands company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Region Stockholm company has not reported any.

In the current year, Region Stockholm company and Government of the Netherlands company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Region Stockholm company nor Government of the Netherlands company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Region Stockholm company nor Government of the Netherlands company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Government of the Netherlands company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Region Stockholm company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Government of the Netherlands company nor Region Stockholm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Government of the Netherlands nor Region Stockholm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Region Stockholm company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Government of the Netherlands company.

Region Stockholm company employs more people globally than Government of the Netherlands company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Government of the Netherlands nor Region Stockholm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Government of the Netherlands nor Region Stockholm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Government of the Netherlands nor Region Stockholm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Government of the Netherlands nor Region Stockholm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Government of the Netherlands nor Region Stockholm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Government of the Netherlands nor Region Stockholm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H