Comparison Overview

Goldberg, Miller & Rubin

VS

King & Fisher

Goldberg, Miller & Rubin

121 S. Broad Street, Philadelphia, 19107, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://gmrlawfirm.com

Goldberg, Miller & Rubin has built a solid foundation in civil litigation with several hundred defense verdicts and hundreds more defense arbitration awards. With over 50 attorneys and offices in Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey, GMR has extensive expertise defending auto liability, premise liability, toxic tort, products liability, bad faith/coverage and healthcare fraud cases. The Firm is recognized for successfully prosecuting complex civil RICO claims with multi-million dollar verdicts and managing a large, multinational company’s asbestos litigation for more than three decades. Insurance claims professionals, hospitals, supermarkets, property management companies, commercial real estate owners and self-insured businesses rely on us for our strategic counsel in matters of defense. We have earned recognition for our litigation, representation and results delivered with expertise and efficiency.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

King & Fisher

Three Galleria Tower, Dallas, Texas, 75240, US
Last Update: 2026-03-12
Between 750 and 799
https://www.king-fisher.com/

King & Fisher is a unique law firm focused exclusively on outsourcing, technology transactions, and business contracts. Our partners each have more than 20 years of experience handling technology, outsourcing and other commercial transactions for many of the world’s leading technology companies and their customers, including Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Facebook, Quicken Loans, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Wal-Mart, Xerox, CNET, American Airlines, AT&T, Samsung, Verizon Wireless, Hewlett-Packard, Sprint, Salesforce.com, Match.com, eBay, Rackspace, and DuPont, just to name a few. We work with all types of clients, from start-ups, to established small and medium-sized companies, to Fortune 10 companies. We understand the need to balance the legal and business demands and risks to get a deal done. Representative types of transactions include Software Licenses, Software as a Service (SaaS) and other Cloud Contracts, Outsourcing Agreements (IT and BPO), Service Levels, Development Agreements, Implementation Agreements, Integration Agreements, Hardware Acquisition, Website Agreements, Manufacturing Agreements, Nondisclosure Agreements, Copyrights, Big Data, Advertising, Trademarks, Disaster Recovery / Business Continuity, Service Agreements, Privacy Issues, Mobile App Agreements, Open Source Issues, and Trade Secrets.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldberg-miller-&-rubin.jpeg
Goldberg, Miller & Rubin
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/king-fisher.jpeg
King & Fisher
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Goldberg, Miller & Rubin
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
King & Fisher
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goldberg, Miller & Rubin in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for King & Fisher in 2026.

Incident History — Goldberg, Miller & Rubin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goldberg, Miller & Rubin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — King & Fisher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

King & Fisher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldberg-miller-&-rubin.jpeg
Goldberg, Miller & Rubin
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/king-fisher.jpeg
King & Fisher
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Goldberg, Miller & Rubin company and King & Fisher company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, King & Fisher company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Goldberg, Miller & Rubin company.

In the current year, King & Fisher company and Goldberg, Miller & Rubin company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither King & Fisher company nor Goldberg, Miller & Rubin company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither King & Fisher company nor Goldberg, Miller & Rubin company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither King & Fisher company nor Goldberg, Miller & Rubin company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Goldberg, Miller & Rubin company nor King & Fisher company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Goldberg, Miller & Rubin nor King & Fisher holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Goldberg, Miller & Rubin company nor King & Fisher company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Goldberg, Miller & Rubin company employs more people globally than King & Fisher company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Goldberg, Miller & Rubin nor King & Fisher holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Goldberg, Miller & Rubin nor King & Fisher holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Goldberg, Miller & Rubin nor King & Fisher holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Goldberg, Miller & Rubin nor King & Fisher holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Goldberg, Miller & Rubin nor King & Fisher holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Goldberg, Miller & Rubin nor King & Fisher holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References