Comparison Overview

Gilead Sciences

VS

Agilent Technologies

Gilead Sciences

333 Lakeside Drive, Foster City, 94404, US
Last Update: 2026-04-02
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.gilead.com

At Gilead, we set – and achieve – bold ambitions to create a healthier world for all people. From our pioneering virology medicines to our growing impact in oncology, we're delivering innovations once thought impossible in medicine. Our focus goes beyond medicines, and we also strive to remedy health inequities and break down barriers to care. We empower our people to tackle these challenges, and we’re all united in our commitment to help millions of people live healthier lives. Social Media Guidelines: https://www.gilead.com/social-media-guidelines

NAICS: 541714
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees: 14,605
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Agilent Technologies

5301 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Santa Clara, 95051, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
http://www.agilent.com

Agilent customers are finding new ways to treat cancer, ensure food, water, air, and medicine quality and safety, discover new drug treatments, research infectious diseases, and create alternative energy solutions for a greener planet. From start to finish, we have them covered with our vast product solutions and services portfolio. Around the world, Agilent’s people bring innovations, technologies, and services to the forefront of science. Our teams design and manufacture a wide array of advanced analytical, research, and diagnostic solutions and tools for use inside and outside laboratories. Additionally, the unique expertise of Agilent’s CrossLab and technical teams provides valuable insight and support to our customers, helping them fully optimize their laboratories and resources to better focus on what's important: bringing great science to life. In fiscal 2022, Agilent Technologies generated revenue of (US) $6.85 billion.

NAICS: 541714
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees: 17,508
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gilead-sciences.jpeg
Gilead Sciences
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/agilent-technologies.jpeg
Agilent Technologies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gilead Sciences
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Agilent Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gilead Sciences in 2026.

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Agilent Technologies in 2026.

Incident History — Gilead Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gilead Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Agilent Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Agilent Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gilead-sciences.jpeg
Gilead Sciences
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error (Mailing Error)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing, Server Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/agilent-technologies.jpeg
Agilent Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gilead Sciences company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Agilent Technologies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Gilead Sciences company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Agilent Technologies company has not reported any.

In the current year, Agilent Technologies company and Gilead Sciences company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Agilent Technologies company nor Gilead Sciences company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Gilead Sciences company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Agilent Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Gilead Sciences company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Agilent Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Gilead Sciences company nor Agilent Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gilead Sciences nor Agilent Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Agilent Technologies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gilead Sciences company.

Agilent Technologies company employs more people globally than Gilead Sciences company, reflecting its scale as a Biotechnology Research.

Neither Gilead Sciences nor Agilent Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gilead Sciences nor Agilent Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gilead Sciences nor Agilent Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gilead Sciences nor Agilent Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gilead Sciences nor Agilent Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gilead Sciences nor Agilent Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References