Comparison Overview

GEA Group

VS

Parker Hannifin

GEA Group

Ulmenstraße 99, Düsseldorf, 40476, DE
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gea.com

GEA is one of the largest technology suppliers for food processing and a wide range of other industries. The global group specializes in machinery, plants, as well as process technology and components. GEA provides resource-efficient solutions for sophisticated production processes in diverse end-user markets and offers a comprehensive service portfolio.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 15,864
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Parker Hannifin

6035 Parkland Blvd, Cleveland, OH, US, 44124
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 550 and 599
https://www.parker.com/us/en/about-parker.html

Parker Hannifin is a Fortune 250 global leader in motion and control technologies. For more than a century the company has been enabling engineering breakthroughs that lead to a better tomorrow. Learn more at www.parker.com or on Twitter @parkerhannifin. Executive Officers: Jennifer A. Parmentier, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Andrew D. Ross, President and Chief Operating Officer Todd Leombruno, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Mark J. Hart, Executive Vice President, Human Resources and External Affairs See our complete Global Leadership Team - https://www.parker.com/us/en/about-parker/parker-leadership.html Visit our Parker Technology Blog at http://blog.parker.com Follow us: X at http://twitter.com/parkerhannifin Facebook at http://facebook.com/parkerhannifin YouTube channel http://youtube.com/parkervideo Youtube Product and support channel: https://www.youtube.com/@ParkerProductsSupport Instagram - http://instagram.com/parkerhannifin The company's products are vital to virtually everything that moves or requires control, including the manufacture and processing of raw materials, durable goods, infrastructure development and all forms of transport. Key technology areas are aerospace, climate control, electromechanical, filtration, fluid and gas handling, hydraulics, pneumatics, process control, sealing and shielding and human motion. Traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "PH,"​ Parker is strategically diversified, value-driven and well positioned for global growth as the industry consolidator and supplier of choice. Interested in a career at Parker Hannifin: Website at www.parker.com/careers

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 28,300
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geagroup.jpeg
GEA Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/parker-hannifin.jpeg
Parker Hannifin
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GEA Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Parker Hannifin
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GEA Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parker Hannifin in 2026.

Incident History — GEA Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GEA Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Parker Hannifin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parker Hannifin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geagroup.jpeg
GEA Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/parker-hannifin.jpeg
Parker Hannifin
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, malware deployment
Motivation: financial gain, cybercrime
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

GEA Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Parker Hannifin company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Parker Hannifin company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GEA Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Parker Hannifin company and GEA Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Parker Hannifin company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while GEA Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Parker Hannifin company has disclosed at least one data breach, while GEA Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Parker Hannifin company nor GEA Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GEA Group company nor Parker Hannifin company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GEA Group nor Parker Hannifin holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Parker Hannifin company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GEA Group company.

Parker Hannifin company employs more people globally than GEA Group company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither GEA Group nor Parker Hannifin holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GEA Group nor Parker Hannifin holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GEA Group nor Parker Hannifin holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GEA Group nor Parker Hannifin holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GEA Group nor Parker Hannifin holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GEA Group nor Parker Hannifin holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References