Comparison Overview

General Dynamics Information Technology

VS

Infosys BPM

General Dynamics Information Technology

Falls Church, Virginia, US, 22042
Last Update: 2026-03-27
Between 750 and 799

GDIT is a global technology and professional services company that delivers solutions, technology and mission services to every major agency across the U.S. government, defense and intelligence community. Our 30,000 experts extract the power of technology to create immediate value and deliver solutions at the edge of innovation. We operate across 50+ countries worldwide, offering leading capabilities in digital modernization, AI/ML, Cloud, Cyber and application development. GDIT is part of General Dynamics, a global aerospace and defense company. We have shared our clients’ sense of purpose for over half a century and have a unique understanding of their missions, complex environments, and a rapidly changing world. Together with our clients, we strive to create a safer, smarter world by harnessing the power of deep expertise and advanced technology.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 26,279
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Infosys BPM

Infosys BPM Limited, Plot no 26/3, 26/4, 26/6, Hosur Road, Electronics City, Bengaluru, 560100, IN
Last Update: 2026-03-25
Between 800 and 849

Infosys BPM Ltd., the business process management subsidiary of Infosys Ltd. (NYSE: INFY), was set up in April 2002. Infosys BPM focuses on integrated end-to-end outsourcing and delivers transformational benefits to its clients through reduced costs, ongoing productivity improvements, and process re-engineering. Infosys BPM operates in India, Poland, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, Ireland, South Africa, Brazil, Mexico, Costa Rica, the United States, Puerto Rico, China, the Philippines, Singapore, and Australia. Infosys BPM has been consistently ranked among the leading BPM companies and has received over 60 awards and recognitions in the last 5 years from key industry bodies and forums like the International Association of Outsourcing Professionals, Outsourcing Center, SSON, and NOA, among others. Infosys BPM also has very robust people practices, as substantiated by the various HR-specific awards it has won over the years. The company has consistently been ranked among the top employers of choice, on the basis of its industry-leading HR best practices. The company’s senior leaders contribute widely to industry forums as BPO strategists.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 43,598
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gdit.jpeg
General Dynamics Information Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infosys-bpm.jpeg
Infosys BPM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
General Dynamics Information Technology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Infosys BPM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Dynamics Information Technology in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Infosys BPM in 2026.

Incident History — General Dynamics Information Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Dynamics Information Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Infosys BPM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infosys BPM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gdit.jpeg
General Dynamics Information Technology
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infosys-bpm.jpeg
Infosys BPM
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Infosys BPM company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to General Dynamics Information Technology company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Infosys BPM company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to General Dynamics Information Technology company.

In the current year, Infosys BPM company and General Dynamics Information Technology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Infosys BPM company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while General Dynamics Information Technology company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Infosys BPM company nor General Dynamics Information Technology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Infosys BPM company nor General Dynamics Information Technology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

General Dynamics Information Technology company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Infosys BPM company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Infosys BPM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Infosys BPM company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to General Dynamics Information Technology company.

Infosys BPM company employs more people globally than General Dynamics Information Technology company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Infosys BPM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Infosys BPM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Infosys BPM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Infosys BPM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Infosys BPM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Infosys BPM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024. This affects the function setLanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94.

Description

Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A critical security vulnerability in parisneo/lollms versions up to 2.2.0 allows any authenticated user to accept or reject friend requests belonging to other users. The `respond_request()` function in `backend/routers/friends.py` does not implement proper authorization checks, enabling Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attacks. Specifically, the `/api/friends/requests/{friendship_id}` endpoint fails to verify whether the authenticated user is part of the friendship or the intended recipient of the request. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, privacy violations, and potential social engineering attacks. The issue has been addressed in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N