Galeries Lafayette Company Cyber Security Posture

groupegalerieslafayette.com

À la pointe des tendances, que le Groupe Galeries Lafayette a bien souvent initiées, il poursuit avec ses 15 000 collaborateurs cette success story avec ses marques emblématiques (Galeries Lafayette, BHV MARAIS, Louis Pion Royal Quartz, Didier Guérin et Citynove) et en se développant à l’international. En 2012, le chiffre d’affaires du groupe Galeries Lafayette s’élevait à 3,8 milliards d’euros sur l’ensemble de ses 250 points de vente et de son site e-commerce. Deux grandes marques référence L’une donne vie à des expériences de mode marquantes, l’autre inspire les urbains créatifs. Les deux sont innovantes et impertinentes. Les Galeries Lafayette et le BHV MARAIS confèrent à la Branche Grands Magasins un positionnement unique. 800 000 visiteurs se pressent chaque jour dans nos 69 magasins (65 Galeries Lafayette et 4 BHV MARAIS). Nos 13 000 collaborateurs contribuent au quotidien à écrire l’histoire, en étant les ambassadeurs de ces deux enseignes référentes. Le BHV nouveau style Le mythique Bazar de l’Hôtel de Ville est devenu le BHV MARAIS. Ce grand magasin multi-spécialiste (maison, bricolage, mode et loisirs) reste fidèle à son état d’esprit et à son histoire, avec plus de 150 000 références au sein de quatre adresses en France. Aujourd’hui, l’enseigne s’est réinventée pour faire du style « un style de vie ». Une marque de fabrique résolument audacieuse en connexion avec son époque. Un univers singulier qui inspire les urbains créatifs au cœur de la capitale. Un monument de la mode Symbole de l’art de vivre à la française depuis la fin du XIXe siècle, les Galeries Lafayette font rayonner la mode avec passion, générosité et audace. Grâce à une sélection de marques des plus accessibles aux plus luxueuses, les Galeries Lafayette offrent un univers où la « Mode vit plus fort » avec glamour et magie. Ses 11 000 collaborateurs font vivre une expérience unique à tous leurs clients, en France et dans le monde.

Galeries Lafayette Company Details

Linkedin ID:

galeries-lafayette

Employees number:

10,001+ employees

Number of followers:

217063

NAICS:

452

Industry Type:

Retail

Homepage:

groupegalerieslafayette.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

GAL_1110955

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreGaleries Lafayette Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 800 and 900

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

globalscoreGaleries Lafayette Global Score
blurone
Ailogo

Galeries Lafayette Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 800 and 900

Galeries Lafayette Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
0
Attack Types
0
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView

Galeries Lafayette Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

À la pointe des tendances, que le Groupe Galeries Lafayette a bien souvent initiées, il poursuit avec ses 15 000 collaborateurs cette success story avec ses marques emblématiques (Galeries Lafayette, BHV MARAIS, Louis Pion Royal Quartz, Didier Guérin et Citynove) et en se développant à l’international. En 2012, le chiffre d’affaires du groupe Galeries Lafayette s’élevait à 3,8 milliards d’euros sur l’ensemble de ses 250 points de vente et de son site e-commerce. Deux grandes marques référence L’une donne vie à des expériences de mode marquantes, l’autre inspire les urbains créatifs. Les deux sont innovantes et impertinentes. Les Galeries Lafayette et le BHV MARAIS confèrent à la Branche Grands Magasins un positionnement unique. 800 000 visiteurs se pressent chaque jour dans nos 69 magasins (65 Galeries Lafayette et 4 BHV MARAIS). Nos 13 000 collaborateurs contribuent au quotidien à écrire l’histoire, en étant les ambassadeurs de ces deux enseignes référentes. Le BHV nouveau style Le mythique Bazar de l’Hôtel de Ville est devenu le BHV MARAIS. Ce grand magasin multi-spécialiste (maison, bricolage, mode et loisirs) reste fidèle à son état d’esprit et à son histoire, avec plus de 150 000 références au sein de quatre adresses en France. Aujourd’hui, l’enseigne s’est réinventée pour faire du style « un style de vie ». Une marque de fabrique résolument audacieuse en connexion avec son époque. Un univers singulier qui inspire les urbains créatifs au cœur de la capitale. Un monument de la mode Symbole de l’art de vivre à la française depuis la fin du XIXe siècle, les Galeries Lafayette font rayonner la mode avec passion, générosité et audace. Grâce à une sélection de marques des plus accessibles aux plus luxueuses, les Galeries Lafayette offrent un univers où la « Mode vit plus fort » avec glamour et magie. Ses 11 000 collaborateurs font vivre une expérience unique à tous leurs clients, en France et dans le monde.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=galeries-lafayette' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

Galeries Lafayette Cyber Security News

2024-01-17T08:00:00.000Z
Galeries Lafayette UAE chooses Nuvei to enhance e-commerce payments

Galeries Lafayette UAE, a subsidiary of French Department Stores, has partnered with Canadian fintech company Nuvei.

similarCompanies

Galeries Lafayette Similar Companies

Ulta Beauty

At Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ: ULTA), the possibilities are beautiful. Ulta Beauty is the largest U.S. beauty retailer and the premier beauty destination for cosmetics, fragrance, skin care products, hair care products and salon services. In 1990, the Company reinvented the beauty retail experience by offe

Reliance Digital

Reliance Digital is a Consumer Electronics, Durables, IT & Telecom retail arm of Reliance Retail Group with more than 1300+ stores across India. Reliance Digital seeks to fulfill the dream of every Indian, be it through its nationwide network of conveniently located stores or through its presenc

Toys"R"Us

Toys“R”Us is a beloved brand known all around the world—and we know how to have fun! For over 70 years we've been the toy authority and ambassadors of all things play. Our new vision looks beyond traditional retail for a re-imagined, immersive experience for kids of all ages. We've got a whole new w

Best Buy

At Best Buy, our purpose is to enrich lives through technology. We do that by leveraging our unique combination of tech expertise and human touch to meet our customers’ everyday needs, whether they come to us online, visit our stores or invite us into their homes. With over 1,000 stores and more tha

Agrokor

The Agrokor Group is the largest company in Croatia and one of the leading regional companies with over 50,000 employees. Agrokor is currently in the process of Extraordinary Administration which is a special insolvency procedure in Croatia. At this stage of the Extraordinary Administration, the se

Ross Stores, Inc.

For the last 40+ years, Ross Stores, Inc. has grown from a six-store chain into an $20.4 billion, Fortune 500 Company. We operate our off-price businesses in a way that keeps costs low so we can pass the savings to our customers. We continue to open new stores and our sales growth has outpaced tradi

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

Galeries Lafayette CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Galeries Lafayette has faced 0 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Galeries Lafayette has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as À la pointe des tendances, que le Groupe Galeries Lafayette a bien souvent initiées, il poursuit avec ses 15 000 collaborateurs cette success story avec ses marques emblématiques (Galeries Lafayette, BHV MARAIS, Louis Pion Royal Quartz, Didier Guérin et Citynove) et en se développant à l’international. En 2012, le chiffre d’affaires du groupe Galeries Lafayette s’élevait à 3,8 milliards d’euros sur l’ensemble de ses 250 points de vente et de son site e-commerce. Deux grandes marques référence L’une donne vie à des expériences de mode marquantes, l’autre inspire les urbains créatifs. Les deux sont innovantes et impertinentes. Les Galeries Lafayette et le BHV MARAIS confèrent à la Branche Grands Magasins un positionnement unique. 800 000 visiteurs se pressent chaque jour dans nos 69 magasins (65 Galeries Lafayette et 4 BHV MARAIS). Nos 13 000 collaborateurs contribuent au quotidien à écrire l’histoire, en étant les ambassadeurs de ces deux enseignes référentes. Le BHV nouveau style Le mythique Bazar de l’Hôtel de Ville est devenu le BHV MARAIS. Ce grand magasin multi-spécialiste (maison, bricolage, mode et loisirs) reste fidèle à son état d’esprit et à son histoire, avec plus de 150 000 références au sein de quatre adresses en France. Aujourd’hui, l’enseigne s’est réinventée pour faire du style « un style de vie ». Une marque de fabrique résolument audacieuse en connexion avec son époque. Un univers singulier qui inspire les urbains créatifs au cœur de la capitale. Un monument de la mode Symbole de l’art de vivre à la française depuis la fin du XIXe siècle, les Galeries Lafayette font rayonner la mode avec passion, générosité et audace. Grâce à une sélection de marques des plus accessibles aux plus luxueuses, les Galeries Lafayette offrent un univers où la « Mode vit plus fort » avec glamour et magie. Ses 11 000 collaborateurs font vivre une expérience unique à tous leurs clients, en France et dans le monde..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge