Comparison Overview

Gainwell Technologies

VS

Diebold Nixdorf

Gainwell Technologies

United States, US
Last Update: 2026-03-21

For 50 years, our nation’s federal Medicaid program has worked to improve the health, safety and well-being of America’s most vulnerable populations: low-income families, women and children, seniors, and those with disabilities. With positive health and cost outcomes that pierce inequities and impact economies, the success of these programs is inextricably tied to the prosperity of communities, individual states and the nation as a whole. We think that demands respect and, more importantly, is deserving of a lifetime commitment from innovators who can help those who operate within and around health and human services evolve — in any market at any stage. At Gainwell Technologies, that’s our sole focus. Built across more than five decades, Gainwell has intentionally seized opportunities to advance its digitally enabled services to meet agencies, health plans and MCOs where they are on their modernization journeys and propel them into the future of public health. Our commitment to innovation, deep experience and ability to leverage insights from customers across 50 states has allowed us to expand on next-generation, cloud-enabled technologies. Today, Gainwell offers one of the most comprehensive suites of scalable services and solutions on the market — all proven to deliver cost savings, better patient outcomes and an improved provider experience. Equally important to our expanding technologies and results: We bring ideas that bring policies to life.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,397
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Diebold Nixdorf

350 Orchard Ave NE, North Canton, 44720, US
Last Update: 2026-03-21
Between 650 and 699

Diebold Nixdorf automates, digitizes and transforms the way people bank and shop. Its integrated solutions connect digital and physical channels conveniently, securely and efficiently for millions of consumers every day. As an innovation partner for nearly all of the world's top 100 financial institutions and a majority of the top 25 global retailers, Diebold Nixdorf delivers unparalleled services and technology that power the daily operations and consumer experience of financial institutions and retailers around the world.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 20,251
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gainwell-technologies.jpeg
Gainwell Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diebold.jpeg
Diebold Nixdorf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gainwell Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Diebold Nixdorf
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gainwell Technologies in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diebold Nixdorf in 2026.

Incident History — Gainwell Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gainwell Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Diebold Nixdorf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diebold Nixdorf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gainwell-technologies.jpeg
Gainwell Technologies
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering (Unauthorized Caller Access to Reimbursement Account)
Motivation: Unknown (Potential Financial or Data Theft)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diebold.jpeg
Diebold Nixdorf
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Hard Drive Encryption Bypass
Motivation: Financial Data Breach, Unauthorized Cash Withdrawals
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Gainwell Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Diebold Nixdorf company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Diebold Nixdorf company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Gainwell Technologies company.

In the current year, Diebold Nixdorf company and Gainwell Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Diebold Nixdorf company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Gainwell Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Gainwell Technologies company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Diebold Nixdorf company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Diebold Nixdorf company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Gainwell Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Diebold Nixdorf company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Gainwell Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Diebold Nixdorf holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gainwell Technologies company nor Diebold Nixdorf company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Diebold Nixdorf company employs more people globally than Gainwell Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Diebold Nixdorf holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Diebold Nixdorf holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Diebold Nixdorf holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Diebold Nixdorf holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Diebold Nixdorf holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Diebold Nixdorf holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A flaw has been found in wandb OpenUI up to 1.0. This affects the function create_share/get_share of the file backend/openui/server.py of the component HTMLAnnotator Component. Executing a manipulation of the argument ID can lead to HTML injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in QDOCS Smart School Management System up to 7.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /admin/enquiry of the component Admission Enquiry Module. Performing a manipulation of the argument Note results in cross site scripting. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The Ultimate Member plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.2. This is due to the '{usermeta:password_reset_link}' template tag being processed within post content via the '[um_loggedin]' shortcode, which generates a valid password reset token for the currently logged-in user viewing the page. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to craft a malicious pending post that, when previewed by an Administrator, generates a password reset token for the Administrator and exfiltrates it to an attacker-controlled server, leading to full account takeover.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

LibJWT is a C JSON Web Token Library. Starting in version 3.0.0 and prior to version 3.3.0, the JWK parsing for RSA-PSS did not protect against a NULL value when expecting to parse JSON string values. A specially crafted JWK file could exploit this behavior by using integers in places where the code expected a string. This was fixed in v3.3.0. A workaround is available. Users importing keys through a JWK file should not do so from untrusted sources. Use the `jwk2key` tool to check for validity of a JWK file. Likewise, if possible, do not use JWK files with RSA-PSS keys.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Locutus brings stdlibs of other programming languages to JavaScript for educational purposes. Starting in version 2.0.39 and prior to version 3.0.25, a prototype pollution vulnerability exists in the `parse_str` function of the npm package locutus. An attacker can pollute `Object.prototype` by overriding `RegExp.prototype.test` and then passing a crafted query string to `parse_str`, bypassing the prototype pollution guard. This vulnerability stems from an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-25521. The CVE-2026-25521 patch replaced the `String.prototype.includes()`-based guard with a `RegExp.prototype.test()`-based guard. However, `RegExp.prototype.test` is itself a writable prototype method that can be overridden, making the new guard bypassable in the same way as the original — trading one hijackable built-in for another. Version 3.0.25 contains an updated fix.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X