Freya Company Cyber Security Posture

freya.nl

Freya is the Dutch patient association for people experiencing fertility problems. Freya offers information, online support and is dealing with the common interests of these patients. Freya is de vereniging voor mensen met vruchtbaarheidsproblemen. Freya geeft informatie, voorziet in lotgenotencontact en behartigt de belangen van deze groep.

Freya Company Details

Linkedin ID:

freya

Employees number:

29 employees

Number of followers:

653

NAICS:

none

Industry Type:

Non-profit Organization Management

Homepage:

freya.nl

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

FRE_2920909

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreFreya Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 200 and 800

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

Ailogo

Freya Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 200 and 800

Freya Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView
freyaCyber Attack60209/2023FRE153224923Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: All of the websites for Wacoal, Fantasie, Freya, and Elomi are unavailable and show an error message indicating that maintenance is being done to them. One independent Wacoal stockist informed Drapers that a cyber attack had attacked the European division of the Japanese company, affecting the ordering systems, websites, and phone systems. They are unable to place new orders while we wait for the systems to restart. Their phone systems aren't all functional. Owner of the womenswear boutique Robinson's in Alnwick, Northumberland, Julie Robinson, acknowledged that she had also been made aware of the problem.

Freya Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Freya is the Dutch patient association for people experiencing fertility problems. Freya offers information, online support and is dealing with the common interests of these patients. Freya is de vereniging voor mensen met vruchtbaarheidsproblemen. Freya geeft informatie, voorziet in lotgenotencontact en behartigt de belangen van deze groep.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=freya' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

Freya Cyber Security News

2025-05-20T07:00:00.000Z
Marks & Spencers faces class action lawsuit over cyber attack

British department store chain Marks & Spencer is facing a multimillion pound lawsuit following its cyber attack. The complaint specificallyย ...

2025-04-09T07:00:00.000Z
A hatch manufacturer started using augmented reality and ditched VPNs โ€” it cut costs by thousands

Surespan, a UK manufacturer, has worked on some of the world's biggest construction projects, from SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles to the world'sย ...

2025-01-07T08:00:00.000Z
Estonian CybExer Technologies secures โ‚ฌ1.5M to expand its AI-based cybersecurity training solutions

The platform offers a range of advanced cybersecurity training modules designed to enhance the cyber capabilities of organizations. With itsย ...

2024-08-03T07:00:00.000Z
A medical drama unfolded, and IT staff were the heroes

At 12:09 a.m. on Friday, July 19, a software update pushed out by cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike shut down 8.5 million Windows machines.

2025-05-02T07:00:00.000Z
Editorโ€™s comment: How safe is your businessโ€™s cyber-security?

Editor's comment: How safe is your business's cyber-security? By Jill Geoghegan 2 May 2025. Share. Add to Bookmarks. As Marks & Spencer's cyber-ย ...

2025-05-08T01:19:49.000Z
British 'ringleader' of hacking group 'behind M&S cyber attack' fled his home

The hacking group is alleged to have targeted employees of companies across the US with phishing text messages and then used the harvested employee credentialsย ...

2025-04-30T07:00:00.000Z
QNu Labs raises Rs 60 Cr in Series A round led by NQM

QNu Labs is focused on securing data against future threats posed by quantum computing. As quantum computers advance, it may be able to breakย ...

2024-08-07T07:00:00.000Z
Connectivity issues 'holding farmers back', farming leader says

The National Farmers Union says farmers are "unable to do tasks like answer calls and read emails".

2018-06-11T07:00:00.000Z
Dragonfly: How Britainโ€™s energy sector was hacked

Last June, on the day the British public went to the polls in the 2017 general election, the country's energy system was hit by a majorย ...

similarCompanies

Freya Similar Companies

The Y (YMCA)

The Y: We're for youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. WHO WE ARE The Y is the nationโ€™s leading nonprofit strengthening communities through youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. Across the U.S., 2,700 Ys engage 22 million men, women and children โ€“ regar

HWPL

ํ‰ํ™” ์‹คํ˜„์˜ ํ™•์‹คํ•œ ๋‹ต์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋Š” HWPL (์‚ฌ)ํ•˜๋Š˜๋ฌธํ™”์„ธ๊ณ„ํ‰ํ™”๊ด‘๋ณต(HWPL)์€ ์ „์Ÿ์ข…์‹๊ณผ ์„ธ๊ณ„ํ‰ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๋ฆฝ๋œ ๊ตญ์ œํ‰ํ™”๋‹จ์ฒด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, UN ๊ฒฝ์ œ์‚ฌํšŒ์ด์‚ฌํšŒ(ECOSOC) ํŠน๋ณ„ ํ˜‘์˜ ์ง€์œ„, ๊ณต๋ณด๊ตญ(DGC) ๋ฐ ์„œ์šธํŠน๋ณ„์‹œ์— ๋“ฑ๋ก๋œ ํ‰ํ™” NGO ๋‹จ์ฒด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. HWPL์€ โ€˜ํ•˜๋Š˜์˜ ๋ฌธํ™”๋กœ ์„ธ๊ณ„ํ‰ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃจ๊ณ  ๋น›์œผ๋กœ ์ง€๊ตฌ์ดŒ์„ ํšŒ๋ณตํ•œ๋‹คโ€™๋Š” ์ •์‹ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „ ์„ธ๊ณ„์—์„œ ํ‰ํ™”ํ™œ๋™์„ ํŽผ์น˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ˜‘๋ ฅ๋‹จ์ฒด์ธ (์‚ฌ)์„ธ๊ณ„์—ฌ์„ฑํ‰ํ™”๊ทธ๋ฃน(IWPG)๊ณผ ์‚ฐํ•˜๋‹จ์ฒด์ธ ๊ตญ์ œ์ฒญ๋…„ํ‰ํ™”๊ทธ๋ฃน(IPYG), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ „์„ธ๊ณ„ ์ง€๋„์ž๋“ค๋กœ ์ด๋ค„์ง„ ์ž๋ฌธ์œ„์› ๋ฐ ๊ฐ ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๋“ค์ธ ํ™๋ณด

Anchor Trust

The Anchor Group was Englandโ€™s largest not-for-profit provider of housing, care and support to older people up until November 2018 when Anchor merged with Hanover Housing Association to form Anchor Hanover Group. With a reputation built on more than 50 years of experience, 34,000 customers in over 1

Corpo Nacional de Escutas

Official page of CNE - Corpo Nacional de Escutas - Escutismo Catโˆšโ‰ฅlico Portuguโˆšโ„ขs - the National Scout Organization for Portuguese Catholic Scouts. CNE is a non-profit, non-political and non-governmental youth association, aimed at the integral training of young people, based on the method created

International Brotherhood of Boilermakers

Labor Organization Show more Show less

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

Freya CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Freya has faced 1 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack'].

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Freya is the Dutch patient association for people experiencing fertility problems. Freya offers information, online support and is dealing with the common interests of these patients. Freya is de vereniging voor mensen met vruchtbaarheidsproblemen. Freya geeft informatie, voorziet in lotgenotencontact en behartigt de belangen van deze groep..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge