Comparison Overview

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

VS

CrowdStrike

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

Suwalska 19/1, Poznan, 60-461, PL
Last Update: 2026-03-30
Between 750 and 799

## Our core business We manage linux / unix server infrastructures and build the efficient and secure networking environments using hardware cutting edge technologies suited to the needs of the project and the client. We believe in quality, opposed to quantity. Our company consists of highly qualified, experienced people, who share a common passion of both server and network infrastructure management. ## Our principles We stated basic principles, that we see as crucial in successful delivery of a stable and secure network environment project: • we tend to give client what he needs, not what he wants • we believe in open communication with client • client is not our enemy • "strict" is for corporations, we believe in "flexible" • teamwork - share victory, share defeat ## What we do best We specialise in linux / unix server and large network environments management. We think, that every need deserves a custom solution, as in most of cases it is cheaper and easier, than a ready solution with after-integration pain. We deliver individual solutions, that best fulfill need of our clients. The impact is put always on high quality and technological innovation of the project. ## Technologies we use We use a set of technologies we think are best suitable for big projects and those we have experience with, although we do not limit ourselves to them only. We constantly seek for new horizons, new trends and test them, so when they become mature, we can make use of them in our work. Network Security Solutions is always in search of new possibilities. ## Our offer Linux / Unix servers and network Router / Switch management, from big complicated environments to smaller ones. We offer hosting on our servers as well as the ability to manage servers from our customers. We provide 24/7/365 monitoring for customers whose services we manage.

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,471
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CrowdStrike

Remote, US
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 550 and 599

CrowdStrike (Nasdaq: CRWD), a global cybersecurity leader, has redefined modern security with the world’s most advanced cloud-native platform for protecting critical areas of enterprise risk — endpoints and cloud workloads, identity and data. Powered by the CrowdStrike Security Cloud and world-class AI, the CrowdStrike Falcon® platform leverages real-time indicators of attack, threat intelligence, evolving adversary tradecraft and enriched telemetry from across the enterprise to deliver hyper-accurate detections, automated protection and remediation, elite threat hunting and prioritized observability of vulnerabilities. Purpose-built in the cloud with a single lightweight-agent architecture, the Falcon platform delivers rapid and scalable deployment, superior protection and performance, reduced complexity and immediate time-to-value. CrowdStrike: We stop breaches.

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,946
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/freelancer_115.jpeg
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crowdstrike.jpeg
CrowdStrike
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CrowdStrike
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS in 2026.

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

CrowdStrike has 55.04% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CrowdStrike (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CrowdStrike cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/freelancer_115.jpeg
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crowdstrike.jpeg
CrowdStrike
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Compromised machine identities, Service accounts, API tokens, Certificates, SMB network shares
Motivation: Financial gain, Data exfiltration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: BYOVD (Bring-Your-Own-Vulnerable-Driver) exploit embedded in ransomware payload
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat (Malicious Employee), Social Engineering (Voice-Phishing), Credential Theft (SSO Authentication Cookies), Dark Web/Telegram Leak
Motivation: Financial Gain, Extortion, Reputation Damage, Data Theft for Resale
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CrowdStrike company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CrowdStrike company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company has not reported any.

In the current year, CrowdStrike company has reported more cyber incidents than NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company.

CrowdStrike company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

CrowdStrike company has disclosed at least one data breach, while NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

CrowdStrike company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

CrowdStrike company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS nor CrowdStrike holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company nor CrowdStrike company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CrowdStrike company employs more people globally than NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, reflecting its scale as a Computer and Network Security.

Neither NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS nor CrowdStrike holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS nor CrowdStrike holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS nor CrowdStrike holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS nor CrowdStrike holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS nor CrowdStrike holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS nor CrowdStrike holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024. This affects the function setLanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94.

Description

Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A critical security vulnerability in parisneo/lollms versions up to 2.2.0 allows any authenticated user to accept or reject friend requests belonging to other users. The `respond_request()` function in `backend/routers/friends.py` does not implement proper authorization checks, enabling Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attacks. Specifically, the `/api/friends/requests/{friendship_id}` endpoint fails to verify whether the authenticated user is part of the friendship or the intended recipient of the request. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, privacy violations, and potential social engineering attacks. The issue has been addressed in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N