Comparison Overview

Framatome

VS

Neoenergia

Framatome

1 place Jean Millier, Courbevoie, FR, 92400
Last Update: 2026-04-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.framatome.com

Framatome is an international leader in nuclear energy recognized for its innovative, digital and value added solutions for the global nuclear fleet. With worldwide expertise and a proven track record for reliability and performance, the company designs, services and installs components, fuel, and instrumentation and control systems for nuclear power plants. Its more than 18,000 employees work every day to help Framatome’s customers supply ever cleaner, safer and more economical low-carbon energy.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 13,683
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Neoenergia

Praia do Flamengo, 78, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BR
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.neoenergia.com

Somos uma companhia de capital aberto com ações (NEOE3) negociadas na Bolsa de Valores de São Paulo. Parte do grupo espanhol Iberdrola, atuamos no Brasil desde 1997, e atualmente, somos uma das líderes do setor elétrico do país. Estamos presentes em 18 estados e no Distrito Federal, com negócios em toda cadeia do setor elétrico: geração, transmissão, distribuição e comercialização. Nossas distribuidoras de energia, Neoenergia Coelba (BA), Neoenergia Pernambuco (PE), Neoenergia Cosern (RN), Neoenergia Elektro (SP/MS) e Neoenergia Brasília (DF) atendem a 16,5 milhões de clientes, o equivalente a uma população superior a 37 milhões de pessoas. Atuamos na geração, transmissão, distribuição e comercialização de energia e nossa matriz energética é 90% renovável! Por meio do Instituto Neoenergia, fomentamos o desenvolvimento sustentável a partir de ações socioambientais e, assim, contribuimos para a melhoria da qualidade de vida das comunidades onde estamos presentes, sobretudo, pessoas mais vulneráveis, visando sempre pelo desenvolvimento sustentável.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 12,051
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/framatome.jpeg
Framatome
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neoenergia.jpeg
Neoenergia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Framatome
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Neoenergia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Framatome in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neoenergia in 2026.

Incident History — Framatome (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Framatome cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Neoenergia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neoenergia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/framatome.jpeg
Framatome
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neoenergia.jpeg
Neoenergia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Neoenergia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Framatome company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Neoenergia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Framatome company.

In the current year, Neoenergia company and Framatome company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Neoenergia company nor Framatome company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Neoenergia company nor Framatome company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Neoenergia company nor Framatome company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Framatome company nor Neoenergia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Framatome nor Neoenergia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neoenergia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Framatome company.

Framatome company employs more people globally than Neoenergia company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Framatome nor Neoenergia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Framatome nor Neoenergia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Framatome nor Neoenergia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Framatome nor Neoenergia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Framatome nor Neoenergia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Framatome nor Neoenergia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References