Forsvaret Company Cyber Security Posture
forsvaret.dkForsvaret er en af Danmarks største og mest komplekse offentlige institutioner med ansatte inden for mange forskellige faggrupper – både militære og civile. Forsvaret skal med militære midler kunne bidrage til løsning af konfliktforebyggende, fredsbevarende, fredsskabende, humanitære og andre lignende opgaver. Forsvaret råder over Hæren, Søværnet og Flyvevåbnet. Både militære og civile ansatte Hovedparten af de ansatte i Forsvaret udgøres af de ca. 14.700 medarbejdere, der bærer uniform i det daglige. Blandt de militære medarbejdere er der mange forskellige fagligheder og forskellige niveauer, fx officer, sergent og konstabel. Der er både ligheder og mange forskelle mellem de tre værn, som til sammen udgør Forsvarets kerne. Ud af Forsvarets i alt ca. 19.500 medarbejdere bærer de ca. 4.800 ikke uniform. Det er jurister, elektrikere, mekanikere, kokke, læger, socialrådgivere, ingeniører, journalister, it-folk m.v., der har valgt en lidt anderledes arbejdsplads i nogle usædvanlige omgivelser. Uden dem ville den militære maskine ikke kunne køre – både inden for og uden for Danmarks grænser. Faglig og personlig udvikling Som ansat i Forsvaret kan man forvente fokus på faglig og personlig udvikling samt på fællesskabets og den enkeltes trivsel. Forsvaret er en arbejdsplads, som er præget af en høj grad af professionalisme og engagement. Du vil som medarbejder i Forsvaret få mulighed for at udvikle dig og eventuelt avancere i organisationen. Du vil blive udfordret og få masser af muligheder for at afprøve dig selv, ikke mindst i forbindelse med eventuel udsendelse i internationale missioner.
Forsvaret Company Details
forsvaret
10,001+ employees
52420
928
Armed Forces
forsvaret.dk
Scan still pending
FOR_1996029
In-progress
Forsvaret Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Forsvaret Global Score.png)
Forsvaret Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
Forsvaret Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Forsvaret Company Subsidiaries
Forsvaret er en af Danmarks største og mest komplekse offentlige institutioner med ansatte inden for mange forskellige faggrupper – både militære og civile. Forsvaret skal med militære midler kunne bidrage til løsning af konfliktforebyggende, fredsbevarende, fredsskabende, humanitære og andre lignende opgaver. Forsvaret råder over Hæren, Søværnet og Flyvevåbnet. Både militære og civile ansatte Hovedparten af de ansatte i Forsvaret udgøres af de ca. 14.700 medarbejdere, der bærer uniform i det daglige. Blandt de militære medarbejdere er der mange forskellige fagligheder og forskellige niveauer, fx officer, sergent og konstabel. Der er både ligheder og mange forskelle mellem de tre værn, som til sammen udgør Forsvarets kerne. Ud af Forsvarets i alt ca. 19.500 medarbejdere bærer de ca. 4.800 ikke uniform. Det er jurister, elektrikere, mekanikere, kokke, læger, socialrådgivere, ingeniører, journalister, it-folk m.v., der har valgt en lidt anderledes arbejdsplads i nogle usædvanlige omgivelser. Uden dem ville den militære maskine ikke kunne køre – både inden for og uden for Danmarks grænser. Faglig og personlig udvikling Som ansat i Forsvaret kan man forvente fokus på faglig og personlig udvikling samt på fællesskabets og den enkeltes trivsel. Forsvaret er en arbejdsplads, som er præget af en høj grad af professionalisme og engagement. Du vil som medarbejder i Forsvaret få mulighed for at udvikle dig og eventuelt avancere i organisationen. Du vil blive udfordret og få masser af muligheder for at afprøve dig selv, ikke mindst i forbindelse med eventuel udsendelse i internationale missioner.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Forsvaret Cyber Security News
Støre soars on security issues
Their remarkable rise in political fortunes is widely linked to all the public attention on national security, foreign policy and defense issues ...
Iceland’s FM announces defence review, calls revamped security policy ‘urgent’ – Eye on the Arctic
Iceland's foreign minister is sounding the alarm on national security, announcing an accelerated review of the country's defence and ...
Police seek more support
Norwegian defense forces won't be alone in responding to any national emergency. · The threats include hacking, sabotage · The Vest Police ...
Alarm over Russian-directed sabotage operations growing across Europe
The uptick in arrests and warnings follows NATO and the European Union condemning “intensifying” Russian sabotage and hybrid operations earlier ...
Norwegian “Digital Border Defense” and Competence for the Unforeseen: A Grounded Theory Approach
A tool meant to ensure that the Norwegian Armed Forces Cyber Defence (NAFCD) has the necessary expertise to cope with current and future unforeseen events.
Svalbard and Geopolitics: A Need for Clarity
The new Svalbard white paper is clear on how national control is to be safeguarded and strengthened on the archipelago. However, it lacks transparency.
Norway issues new warnings about Russia and China, and a call to arms
The Norwegian prime minister's warnings come after his government also has proposed and won full support for an unprecedented military build-up, ...
Threat levels highest in decades
China and Norway's neighbouring Russia still pose the biggest threats, they claim, while the threat of terrorist attacks is “moderate.” Vice ...
Defense spending jumps amid crisis and criticism over national security
His armed forces stand to get the biggest budget increase (9.8 percent), in an effort to vastly improve national security. Defense Chief Eirik ...
Forsvaret Similar Companies
U.S. Coast Guard
The mission of the U.S. Coast Guard is to protect the public, the environment, and U.S. economic interests — in the nation's ports and waterways, along the coast, on international waters, or in any maritime region as required to support national security. As one of the five branches of the Armed
Swedish Armed Forces
The Swedish Armed Forces is one of the biggest authorities in Sweden and is headed by a Supreme Commander. The deputy leader of the authority is the Director General. As the only authority permitted to engage in armed combat, the Swedish Armed Forces are Sweden’s ultimate security policy resource
1st Reconnaissance Battalion, USMC
1st Reconnaissance Battalion (abbreviated as 1st Recon Bn) is a reconnaissance battalion in the United States Marine Corps, 1st Marine Division, I Marine Expeditionary Force (I MEF). The following are examples of missions outlined to 1st Reconnaissance Battalion: • Plan, coordinate, and conduct amp
Marine Corps Recruiting
This is the Official LinkedIn Page of Marine Corps Recruiting. We make Marines. We win our nation's battles. We develop quality citizens. These are the promises the Marine Corps makes to our nation and to our Marines. The core values that guide us, and the leadership skills that enable us, not on
Sri Lanka Army
The Army Act was enacted in parliament on the 10th of October 1949 which is recognized as the day, the Ceylon Army was raised. The Army was to be comprised of a Regular and a Volunteer force. In May 1972, when Ceylon became the Republic of Sri Lanka, all Army units were renamed accordingly Regime
Israel Defense Forces
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) is the military of the State of Israel, responsible for the nation's defense and security. Founded in 1948, the IDF ranks among the most battle-tested armed forces in the world, having had to defend the country in six major wars. At the age of 18, men and women are
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Forsvaret CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Forsvaret has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Forsvaret has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Forsvaret er en af Danmarks største og mest komplekse offentlige institutioner med ansatte inden for mange forskellige faggrupper – både militære og civile. Forsvaret skal med militære midler kunne bidrage til løsning af konfliktforebyggende, fredsbevarende, fredsskabende, humanitære og andre lignende opgaver. Forsvaret råder over Hæren, Søværnet og Flyvevåbnet. Både militære og civile ansatte Hovedparten af de ansatte i Forsvaret udgøres af de ca. 14.700 medarbejdere, der bærer uniform i det daglige. Blandt de militære medarbejdere er der mange forskellige fagligheder og forskellige niveauer, fx officer, sergent og konstabel. Der er både ligheder og mange forskelle mellem de tre værn, som til sammen udgør Forsvarets kerne. Ud af Forsvarets i alt ca. 19.500 medarbejdere bærer de ca. 4.800 ikke uniform. Det er jurister, elektrikere, mekanikere, kokke, læger, socialrådgivere, ingeniører, journalister, it-folk m.v., der har valgt en lidt anderledes arbejdsplads i nogle usædvanlige omgivelser. Uden dem ville den militære maskine ikke kunne køre – både inden for og uden for Danmarks grænser. Faglig og personlig udvikling Som ansat i Forsvaret kan man forvente fokus på faglig og personlig udvikling samt på fællesskabets og den enkeltes trivsel. Forsvaret er en arbejdsplads, som er præget af en høj grad af professionalisme og engagement. Du vil som medarbejder i Forsvaret få mulighed for at udvikle dig og eventuelt avancere i organisationen. Du vil blive udfordret og få masser af muligheder for at afprøve dig selv, ikke mindst i forbindelse med eventuel udsendelse i internationale missioner..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
